PDA: Text-Augmented Defense Framework for Robust Vision-Language Models against Adversarial Image Attacks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01010v1
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 15:16:07 GMT
- Title: PDA: Text-Augmented Defense Framework for Robust Vision-Language Models against Adversarial Image Attacks
- Abstract summary: Paraphrase-Decomposition-Aggregation (PDA) is a training-free defense framework for vision-language models (VLMs)<n>PDA performs prompt paraphrasing, question decomposition, and consistency aggregation entirely at test time.<n>PDA achieves consistent robustness gains against various adversarial perturbations while maintaining competitive clean accuracy.
- Score: 5.397723452516847
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial image perturbations. Existing works based on adversarial training against task-specific adversarial examples are computationally expensive and often fail to generalize to unseen attack types. To address these limitations, we introduce Paraphrase-Decomposition-Aggregation (PDA), a training-free defense framework that leverages text augmentation to enhance VLM robustness under diverse adversarial image attacks. PDA performs prompt paraphrasing, question decomposition, and consistency aggregation entirely at test time, thus requiring no modification on the underlying models. To balance robustness and efficiency, we instantiate PDA as invariants that reduce the inference cost while retaining most of its robustness gains. Experiments on multiple VLM architectures and benchmarks for visual question answering, classification, and captioning show that PDA achieves consistent robustness gains against various adversarial perturbations while maintaining competitive clean accuracy, establishing a generic, strong and practical defense framework for VLMs during inference.
Related papers
- Dual Adversarial Fine-tuning for Enhancing Robustness of Large Vision Language Model [73.59026525350808]
We propose a dual adversarial fine-tuning framework that jointly optimize visual and semantic supervision signals from two modalities.<n>Our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method in adversarial robustness evaluation across zero-shot classification, image captioning, and visual question answering tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-21T10:49:29Z) - Towards Highly Transferable Vision-Language Attack via Semantic-Augmented Dynamic Contrastive Interaction [67.45032003041399]
We propose a Semantic-Augmented Dynamic Contrastive Attack (SADCA) that enhances adversarial transferability through progressive and semantically guided perturbations.<n>SADCA establishes a contrastive learning mechanism involving adversarial, positive and negative samples, to reinforce the semantic inconsistency of the obtained perturbations.<n>Experiments on multiple datasets and models demonstrate that SADCA significantly improves adversarial transferability and consistently surpasses state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-05T05:46:16Z) - Adversarial Defense in Vision-Language Models: An Overview [7.668103158377842]
The widespread use of Vision Language Models (VLMs) has raised concerns about their vulnerability to sophisticated adversarial attacks.<n>To address this challenge, three main defense paradigms have been proposed: Training-time Defense, Test-time Adaptation Defense, and Training-free Defense.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-18T14:57:51Z) - Diversifying Counterattacks: Orthogonal Exploration for Robust CLIP Inference [45.723695657400576]
We argue that enhancing the diversity and coverage of counterattacks is crucial to improving adversarial robustness in test-time defense.<n>We propose Directional Orthogonal Counterattack (DOC), which augments counterattack optimization by incorporating gradient directions and momentum-based updates.<n>We present a directional sensitivity score based on averaged cosine similarity to boost DOC by improving example discrimination and adaptively modulating the counterattack strength.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-12T07:40:16Z) - Self-Calibrated Consistency can Fight Back for Adversarial Robustness in Vision-Language Models [31.920092341939593]
Self-Calibrated Consistency is an effective test-time defense against adversarial attacks.<n> SCC consistently improves the zero-shot robustness of CLIP while maintaining accuracy.<n>These findings highlight the great potential of establishing an adversarially robust paradigm from CLIP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-26T18:37:12Z) - Quality Text, Robust Vision: The Role of Language in Enhancing Visual Robustness of Vision-Language Models [17.259725776748482]
Existing adversarial training methods for robust fine-tuning largely overlook the role of language in enhancing visual robustness.<n>We propose Quality Text-guided Adversarial Fine-Tuning (QT-AFT), which leverages high-quality captions during training to guide adversarial examples away from diverse semantics present in images.<n> QT-AFT achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot adversarial robustness and clean accuracy, evaluated across 16 zero-shot datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-22T06:13:30Z) - CeTAD: Towards Certified Toxicity-Aware Distance in Vision Language Models [16.5022773312661]
We propose a universal certified defence framework to safeguard large vision-language models against jailbreak attacks.<n>First, we proposed a novel distance metric to quantify semantic discrepancies between malicious and intended responses.<n>Then, we devise a regressed certification approach that employs randomized smoothing to provide formal robustness guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T17:33:55Z) - MirrorCheck: Efficient Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models [55.73581212134293]
We propose a novel, yet elegantly simple approach for detecting adversarial samples in Vision-Language Models.
Our method leverages Text-to-Image (T2I) models to generate images based on captions produced by target VLMs.
Empirical evaluations conducted on different datasets validate the efficacy of our approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T15:55:04Z) - Meta Invariance Defense Towards Generalizable Robustness to Unknown Adversarial Attacks [62.036798488144306]
Current defense mainly focuses on the known attacks, but the adversarial robustness to the unknown attacks is seriously overlooked.
We propose an attack-agnostic defense method named Meta Invariance Defense (MID)
We show that MID simultaneously achieves robustness to the imperceptible adversarial perturbations in high-level image classification and attack-suppression in low-level robust image regeneration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T10:10:38Z) - Few-Shot Adversarial Prompt Learning on Vision-Language Models [62.50622628004134]
The vulnerability of deep neural networks to imperceptible adversarial perturbations has attracted widespread attention.
Previous efforts achieved zero-shot adversarial robustness by aligning adversarial visual features with text supervision.
We propose a few-shot adversarial prompt framework where adapting input sequences with limited data makes significant adversarial robustness improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T18:28:43Z) - Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models [86.5543597406173]
Adversarial Prompt Tuning (AdvPT) is a technique to enhance the adversarial robustness of image encoders in Vision-Language Models (VLMs)
We demonstrate that AdvPT improves resistance against white-box and black-box adversarial attacks and exhibits a synergistic effect when combined with existing image-processing-based defense techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-19T07:47:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.