The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02029v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 13:36:37 GMT
• Title: The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook
• Abstract summary: Latent space is rapidly emerging as a native substrate for language-based models.<n>This survey aims to provide a unified and up-to-date landscape of latent space in language-based models.
• Score: 157.2023962273514
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Latent space is rapidly emerging as a native substrate for language-based models. While modern systems are still commonly understood through explicit token-level generation, an increasing body of work shows that many critical internal processes are more naturally carried out in continuous latent space than in human-readable verbal traces. This shift is driven by the structural limitations of explicit-space computation, including linguistic redundancy, discretization bottlenecks, sequential inefficiency, and semantic loss. This survey aims to provide a unified and up-to-date landscape of latent space in language-based models. We organize the survey into five sequential perspectives: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook. We begin by delineating the scope of latent space, distinguishing it from explicit or verbal space and from the latent spaces commonly studied in generative visual models. We then trace the field's evolution from early exploratory efforts to the current large-scale expansion. To organize the technical landscape, we examine existing work through the complementary lenses of mechanism and ability. From the perspective of Mechanism, we identify four major lines of development: Architecture, Representation, Computation, and Optimization. From the perspective of Ability, we show how latent space supports a broad capability spectrum spanning Reasoning, Planning, Modeling, Perception, Memory, Collaboration, and Embodiment. Beyond consolidation, we discuss the key open challenges, and outline promising directions for future research. We hope this survey serves not only as a reference for existing work, but also as a foundation for understanding latent space as a general computational and systems paradigm for next-generation intelligence.

Related papers

• SpatialImaginer: Towards Adaptive Visual Imagination for Spatial Reasoning [67.67774742200626]
  spatial intelligence, which refers to the ability to reason about geometric and physical structure from visual observations, is a core challenge for large language models.<n>We propose a unified multimodal generation framework that integrates textual reasoning with visual imagination.<n>Our framework adopts a divide-and-conquer strategy, using text chain-of-thought for high-level semantic planning and the visual imagination for geometry-sensitive state transformation and consistency preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-19T11:21:59Z)
• SpatialText: A Pure-Text Cognitive Benchmark for Spatial Understanding in Large Language Models [12.26174714418171]
  Genuine spatial reasoning relies on the capacity to construct and manipulate coherent internal spatial representations.<n>Existing benchmarks fail to isolate this intrinsic spatial cognition from statistical languages.<n>We introduce SpatialText, a theory-driven diagnostic framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T13:52:40Z)
• Theory of Space: Can Foundation Models Construct Spatial Beliefs through Active Exploration? [83.13508919229939]
  Theory of Space is defined as an agent's ability to actively acquire information through self-directed, active exploration.<n>A key innovation is spatial belief probing, which prompts models to reveal their internal spatial representations at each step.<n>Our findings suggest that current foundation models struggle to maintain coherent, revisable spatial beliefs during active exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T19:06:40Z)
• Thinking with Blueprints: Assisting Vision-Language Models in Spatial Reasoning via Structured Object Representation [52.605647992080485]
  spatial reasoning advances vision-language models from visual perception toward semantic understanding.<n>We integrate the cognitive concept of an object-centric blueprint into spatial reasoning.<n>Our method consistently outperforms existing vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T10:38:26Z)
• SpatialBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Spatial Cognition [19.526371771173064]
  spatial cognition is fundamental to real-world multimodal intelligence, allowing models to interact with the physical environment.<n>Existing benchmarks often oversimplify spatial cognition, reducing it to a single-dimensional metric.<n>We propose a hierarchical spatial cognition framework that decomposes spatial intelligence into five progressively complex levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T15:04:18Z)
• Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey of Tasks, Benchmarks and Methods [11.53401872925025]
  We argue that spatial ability is not solely determined by the input format.<n>Our survey introduces a taxonomy that organizes spatial intelligence from cognitive aspect.<n>We analyze methods for improving spatial ability, spanning both training-based and reasoning-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T02:43:17Z)
• Multimodal Spatial Reasoning in the Large Model Era: A Survey and Benchmarks [108.15756345836901]
  We provide a comprehensive review of multimodal spatial reasoning tasks with large models.<n>We review advances in embodied AI, including vision-language navigation and action models.<n>We consider emerging modalities such as audio and egocentric video, which contribute to novel spatial understanding through new sensors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T17:55:43Z)
• Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Interwoven Thinking and Visual Drawing [62.447497430479174]
  Drawing to reason in space is a novel paradigm that enables LVLMs to reason through elementary drawing operations in the visual space.<n>Our model, named VILASR, consistently outperforms existing methods across diverse spatial reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T17:41:50Z)
• SPHERE: Unveiling Spatial Blind Spots in Vision-Language Models Through Hierarchical Evaluation [7.659514491338669]
  Current vision-language models may grasp basic spatial cues but struggle with the multi-dimensional spatial reasoning necessary for human-like understanding and real-world applications.<n>We develop SPHERE, a hierarchical evaluation framework supported by a new human-annotated dataset.<n> Benchmark evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals significant deficiencies, especially in reasoning about distance and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T09:10:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.