AI in Insurance: Adaptive Questionnaires for Improved Risk Profiling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02034v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 13:39:53 GMT
• Title: AI in Insurance: Adaptive Questionnaires for Improved Risk Profiling
• Abstract summary: Insurance application processes often rely on lengthy and standardized questionnaires that struggle to capture individual differences.<n>The ARQuest framework introduces a new approach to underwriting by using Large Language Models (LLMs) and alternative data sources.<n>Social media image analysis, geographic data categorization, and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) are used to extract meaningful user insights.
• Score: 1.6622913397327312
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Insurance application processes often rely on lengthy and standardized questionnaires that struggle to capture individual differences. Moreover, insurers must blindly trust users' responses, increasing the chances of fraud. The ARQuest framework introduces a new approach to underwriting by using Large Language Models (LLMs) and alternative data sources to create personalized and adaptive questionnaires. Techniques such as social media image analysis, geographic data categorization, and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) are used to extract meaningful user insights and guide targeted follow-up questions. A life insurance system integrated into an industry partner mobile app was tested in two experiments. While traditional questionnaires yielded slightly higher accuracy in risk assessment, adaptive versions powered by GPT models required fewer questions and were preferred by users for their more fluid and engaging experience. ARQuest shows great potential to improve user satisfaction and streamline insurance processes. With further development, this approach may exceed traditional methods regarding risk accuracy and help drive innovation in the insurance industry.

Related papers

• SoK: Privacy Risks and Mitigations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [53.51921540246166]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques have become widely popular.<n>RAG involves the coupling of Large Language Models (LLMs) with domain-specific knowledge bases.<n>The proliferation of RAG has sparked concerns about data privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T14:50:41Z)
• Risk-adaptive Activation Steering for Safe Multimodal Large Language Models [25.347491265330863]
  One of the key challenges of modern AI models is ensuring they provide helpful responses to benign queries while refusing malicious ones.<n>We propose to reformulate queries to strengthen cross-modal attention to safety-critical image regions.<n>Using the assessed risk, it adaptively steers activations to generate responses that are safe and helpful without overhead from iterative output adjustments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T15:57:17Z)
• Beyond Reactive Safety: Risk-Aware LLM Alignment via Long-Horizon Simulation [69.63626052852153]
  We propose a proof-of-concept framework that projects how model-generated advice could propagate through societal systems.<n>We also introduce a dataset of 100 indirect harm scenarios, testing models' ability to foresee adverse, non-obvious outcomes from seemingly harmless user prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T02:28:58Z)
• Towards Automated Safety Requirements Derivation Using Agent-based RAG [0.25128687379089687]
  We study the automated derivation of safety requirements in a self-driving vehicle use case, leveraging LLMs in combination with agent-based retrieval-augmented generation.<n>Existing RAG approaches address this issue, yet their performance deteriorates when handling complex queries.<n>In this paper, we propose the use of agent-based RAG to derive safety requirements and show that the retrieved information is more relevant to the queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T14:43:19Z)
• AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons [62.374792825813394]
  This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehensive industry-standard benchmark for assessing AI-product risk and reliability.<n>The benchmark evaluates an AI system's resistance to prompts designed to elicit dangerous, illegal, or undesirable behavior in 12 hazard categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T05:58:52Z)
• Modeling Churn in Recommender Systems with Aggregated Preferences [6.261444979025644]
  We propose a model that addresses the dual challenges of leveraging aggregated user information and mitigating churn risk.<n>Our model assumes that the RS operates with a probabilistic prior over user types and aggregated satisfaction levels for various content types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T13:12:11Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Retrieval Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey [92.36487127683053]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an advanced technique designed to address the challenges of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC)<n>RAG provides reliable and up-to-date external knowledge, reduces hallucinations, and ensures relevant context across a wide range of tasks.<n>Despite RAG's success and potential, recent studies have shown that the RAG paradigm also introduces new risks, including privacy concerns, adversarial attacks, and accountability issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T06:50:47Z)
• Risks and NLP Design: A Case Study on Procedural Document QA [52.557503571760215]
  We argue that clearer assessments of risks and harms to users will be possible when we specialize the analysis to more concrete applications and their plausible users. We conduct a risk-oriented error analysis that could then inform the design of a future system to be deployed with lower risk of harm and better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T17:23:43Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• Post-Contextual-Bandit Inference [57.88785630755165]
  Contextual bandit algorithms are increasingly replacing non-adaptive A/B tests in e-commerce, healthcare, and policymaking. They can both improve outcomes for study participants and increase the chance of identifying good or even best policies. To support credible inference on novel interventions at the end of the study, we still want to construct valid confidence intervals on average treatment effects, subgroup effects, or value of new policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T12:01:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.