SWAY: A Counterfactual Computational Linguistic Approach to Measuring and Mitigating Sycophancy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02423v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 18:00:14 GMT
• Title: SWAY: A Counterfactual Computational Linguistic Approach to Measuring and Mitigating Sycophancy
• Abstract summary: SWAY is an unsupervised computational linguistic measure of sycophancy.<n>We develop a counterfactual prompting mechanism to identify how much a model's agreement shifts under positive or negative linguistic pressure.<n>We introduce a counterfactual mitigation strategy teaching models to consider what the answer would be if opposite assumptions were suggested.
• Score: 1.4732811715354452
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models exhibit sycophancy: the tendency to shift outputs toward user-expressed stances, regardless of correctness or consistency. While prior work has studied this issue and its impacts, rigorous computational linguistic metrics are needed to identify when models are being sycophantic. Here, we introduce SWAY, an unsupervised computational linguistic measure of sycophancy. We develop a counterfactual prompting mechanism to identify how much a model's agreement shifts under positive versus negative linguistic pressure, isolating framing effects from content. Applying this metric to benchmark 6 models, we find that sycophancy increases with epistemic commitment. Leveraging our metric, we introduce a counterfactual mitigation strategy teaching models to consider what the answer would be if opposite assumptions were suggested. While baseline mitigation instructing to be explicitly anti-sycophantic yields moderate reductions, and can backfire, our counterfactual CoT mitigation drives sycophancy to near zero across models, commitment levels, and clause types, while not suppressing responsiveness to genuine evidence. Overall, we contribute a metric for benchmarking sycophancy and a mitigation informed by it.

Related papers

• THESIS-MoE: Trainable Hierarchical Extraction and SteerIng of Sycophancy in Mixture-of-Experts [0.300988853836121]
  Sycophancy, the tendency of a language model to change its answer to match a user's stated belief, is a common alignment failure.<n>We introduce a shared contrastive signal, built from matched prompts with and without a stated belief, that identifies where sycophancy lives.<n>Our results demonstrate that sycophancy resides in identifiable computational subcircuits and can be selectively steered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-16T11:30:26Z)
• Hacking Generative Perplexity: Why Unconditional Text Evaluation Needs Distributional Metrics [49.443264461057645]
  Diffusion and continuous flow-based language models have emerged as the leading non-autoregressive alternatives to language modeling.<n>Progress in both paradigms is overwhelmingly tracked by generative perplexity (gen-PPL): the per-token negative log-likelihood of samples under a frozen autoregressive (AR) scorer.<n>We argue that this metric is unsound. By construction, gen-PPL measures only predictability under the scoring AR, not grammaticality or semantic coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-07T02:35:56Z)
• Ask don't tell: Reducing sycophancy in large language models [1.5701458173528275]
  We show that sycophancy is substantially higher in response to non-questions compared to questions.<n>We find that asking a model to convert non-questions into questions before answering significantly reduces sycophancy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T12:27:04Z)
• CORE: Context-Robust Remasking for Diffusion Language Models [51.59514489363897]
  We propose Context-Robust Remasking (CORE), a training-free framework for inference-time revision.<n>Rather than trusting static token probabilities, CORE identifies context-brittle tokens by probing their sensitivity to targeted masked-context perturbations.<n>On LLaDA-8B-Base, CORE delivers consistent improvements across reasoning and code benchmarks, outperforming compute-matched baselines and improving MBPP by up to 9.2 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T00:12:30Z)
• The Compliance Paradox: Semantic-Instruction Decoupling in Automated Academic Code Evaluation [11.984098021215878]
  We introduce the Semantic-Preserving Adrial Code Injection (SPACI) Framework and the Abstract Syntax Tree-Aware Semantic Injection Protocol (AST-ASIP)<n>These methods exploit the Syntax-Semantics Gap by embedding adversarial directives into syntactically inert regions (trivia nodes) of the Abstract Syntax Tree.<n>Through a large-scale evaluation of 9 SOTA models across 25,000 submissions in Python, C, C++, and Java, we reveal catastrophic failure rates (>95%) in high-capacity open-weights models like DeepSeek-V3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T07:40:58Z)
• Sycophancy under Pressure: Evaluating and Mitigating Sycophantic Bias via Adversarial Dialogues in Scientific QA [36.21980066799023]
  sycophancy is the tendency to align with user beliefs regardless of correctness.<n>Despite its importance, sycophancy remains underexamined in factual question answering contexts.<n>We introduce a unified evaluation framework to quantify the impact of sycophantic context on model behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T11:30:52Z)
• Counterfactual reasoning: an analysis of in-context emergence [57.118735341305786]
  We show that language models are capable of counterfactual reasoning.<n>We find that self-attention, model depth and pre-training data diversity drive performance.<n>Our findings extend to counterfactual reasoning under SDE dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T16:02:07Z)
• Sycophancy in Large Language Models: Causes and Mitigations [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of natural language processing tasks. Their tendency to exhibit sycophantic behavior poses significant risks to their reliability and ethical deployment. This paper provides a technical survey of sycophancy in LLMs, analyzing its causes, impacts, and potential mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T16:56:49Z)
• Sycophancy in Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Analysis and an Inference-Time Mitigation Framework [18.54098084470481]
  We analyze sycophancy across vision-language benchmarks and propose an inference-time mitigation framework.<n>Our framework effectively mitigates sycophancy across all evaluated models, while maintaining performance on neutral prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T01:03:21Z)
• Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models [88.4435858554904]
  We study the prevalence of sycophancy in language models. Sycophancy is where models tailor their responses to follow a human user's view even when that view is not objectively correct.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T23:48:36Z)
• Logical Satisfiability of Counterfactuals for Faithful Explanations in NLI [60.142926537264714]
  We introduce the methodology of Faithfulness-through-Counterfactuals. It generates a counterfactual hypothesis based on the logical predicates expressed in the explanation. It then evaluates if the model's prediction on the counterfactual is consistent with that expressed logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T03:40:59Z)
• SLUA: A Super Lightweight Unsupervised Word Alignment Model via Cross-Lingual Contrastive Learning [79.91678610678885]
  We propose a super lightweight unsupervised word alignment model (SLUA) Experimental results on several public benchmarks demonstrate that our model achieves competitive, if not better, performance. Notably, we recognize our model as a pioneer attempt to unify bilingual word embedding and word alignments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T05:54:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.