Sycophancy in Large Language Models: Causes and Mitigations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15287v1
• Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:56:49 GMT
• Title: Sycophancy in Large Language Models: Causes and Mitigations
• Authors: Lars Malmqvist,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of natural language processing tasks. Their tendency to exhibit sycophantic behavior poses significant risks to their reliability and ethical deployment. This paper provides a technical survey of sycophancy in LLMs, analyzing its causes, impacts, and potential mitigation strategies.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of natural language processing tasks. However, their tendency to exhibit sycophantic behavior - excessively agreeing with or flattering users - poses significant risks to their reliability and ethical deployment. This paper provides a technical survey of sycophancy in LLMs, analyzing its causes, impacts, and potential mitigation strategies. We review recent work on measuring and quantifying sycophantic tendencies, examine the relationship between sycophancy and other challenges like hallucination and bias, and evaluate promising techniques for reducing sycophancy while maintaining model performance. Key approaches explored include improved training data, novel fine-tuning methods, post-deployment control mechanisms, and decoding strategies. We also discuss the broader implications of sycophancy for AI alignment and propose directions for future research. Our analysis suggests that mitigating sycophancy is crucial for developing more robust, reliable, and ethically-aligned language models.

Related papers

• From Passive Metric to Active Signal: The Evolving Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models [77.04403907729738]
  This survey charts the evolution of uncertainty from a passive diagnostic metric to an active control signal guiding real-time model behavior.<n>We demonstrate how uncertainty is leveraged as an active control signal across three frontiers.<n>This survey argues that mastering the new trend of uncertainty is essential for building the next generation of scalable, reliable, and trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T06:21:31Z)
• Mechanistic Interpretability for Large Language Model Alignment: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions [16.821238326410324]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks, yet their internal decision-making processes remain largely opaque.<n>Mechanistic interpretability has emerged as a critical research direction for understanding and aligning these models.<n>We analyze how interpretability insights have informed alignment strategies including reinforcement learning from human feedback, constitutional AI, and scalable oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T11:43:57Z)
• Stable Language Guidance for Vision-Language-Action Models [62.80963701282789]
  Residual Semantic Steering is a probabilistic framework that disentangles physical affordance from semantic execution.<n> RSS achieves state-of-the-art robustness, maintaining performance even under adversarial linguistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T16:16:10Z)
• PENDULUM: A Benchmark for Assessing Sycophancy in Multimodal Large Language Models [43.767942065379366]
  Sycophancy is a tendency of AI models to agree with user input at the expense of factual accuracy or in contradiction of visual evidence.<n>We introduce a comprehensive evaluation benchmark, textitPENDULUM, comprising approximately 2,000 human-curated Visual Question Answering pairs.<n>We observe substantial variability in model robustness and a pronounced susceptibility to sycophantic and hallucinatory behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T12:49:12Z)
• DeceptionBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for AI Deception Behaviors in Real-world Scenarios [57.327907850766785]
  characterization of deception across realistic real-world scenarios remains underexplored.<n>We establish DeceptionBench, the first benchmark that systematically evaluates how deceptive tendencies manifest across different domains.<n>On the intrinsic dimension, we explore whether models exhibit self-interested egoistic tendencies or sycophantic behaviors that prioritize user appeasement.<n>We incorporate sustained multi-turn interaction loops to construct a more realistic simulation of real-world feedback dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T10:14:26Z)
• Sycophancy Mitigation Through Reinforcement Learning with Uncertainty-Aware Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories [58.988535279557546]
  We introduce textbf sycophancy Mitigation through Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories.<n>We show that SMART significantly reduces sycophantic behavior while preserving strong performance on out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T17:09:14Z)
• Anomaly Detection and Generation with Diffusion Models: A Survey [51.61574868316922]
  Anomaly detection (AD) plays a pivotal role across diverse domains, including cybersecurity, finance, healthcare, and industrial manufacturing.<n>Recent advancements in deep learning, specifically diffusion models (DMs), have sparked significant interest.<n>This survey aims to guide researchers and practitioners in leveraging DMs for innovative AD solutions across diverse applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T03:29:18Z)
• Flattery in Motion: Benchmarking and Analyzing Sycophancy in Video-LLMs [18.07249962240035]
  Video large language models (Video-LLMs) are increasingly integrated into real-world applications that demand grounded multimodal reasoning.<n>Sycophancy, the tendency of these models to align with user input even when it contradicts the visual evidence, undermines their trustworthiness in such contexts.<n>We propose VISE (Video-LLM Sycophancy Benchmarking and Evaluation), the first benchmark designed to evaluate sycophantic behavior in state-of-the-art Video-LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T15:00:21Z)
• Benchmarking Adversarial Robustness to Bias Elicitation in Large Language Models: Scalable Automated Assessment with LLM-as-a-Judge [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized artificial intelligence, driving advancements in machine translation, summarization, and conversational agents. Recent studies indicate that LLMs remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks designed to elicit biased responses. This work proposes a scalable benchmarking framework to evaluate LLM robustness against adversarial bias elicitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:00:59Z)
• Model Hemorrhage and the Robustness Limits of Large Language Models [119.46442117681147]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong performance across natural language processing tasks, yet undergo significant performance degradation when modified for deployment. We define this phenomenon as model hemorrhage - performance decline caused by parameter alterations and architectural changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T10:16:03Z)
• Causality can systematically address the monsters under the bench(marks) [64.36592889550431]
  Benchmarks are plagued by various biases, artifacts, or leakage. Models may behave unreliably due to poorly explored failure modes. causality offers an ideal framework to systematically address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T17:01:37Z)
• Breaking Focus: Contextual Distraction Curse in Large Language Models [68.4534308805202]
  We investigate a critical vulnerability in Large Language Models (LLMs) This phenomenon arises when models fail to maintain consistent performance on questions modified with semantically coherent but irrelevant context. We propose an efficient tree-based search methodology to automatically generate CDV examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:43:36Z)
• HarmLevelBench: Evaluating Harm-Level Compliance and the Impact of Quantization on Model Alignment [1.8843687952462742]
  This paper aims to address gaps in the current literature on jailbreaking techniques and the evaluation of LLM vulnerabilities. Our contributions include the creation of a novel dataset designed to assess the harmfulness of model outputs across multiple harm levels. We provide a comprehensive benchmark of state-of-the-art jailbreaking attacks, specifically targeting the Vicuna 13B v1.5 model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:02:49Z)
• Towards Analyzing and Mitigating Sycophancy in Large Vision-Language Models [22.658792167014624]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown significant capability in vision-language understanding. Sycophancy is unduly influenced by leading or deceptive prompts, resulting in biased outputs and hallucinations. We propose a text contrastive decoding method for mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T01:03:21Z)
• Machine Learning Robustness: A Primer [12.426425119438846]
  The discussion begins with a detailed definition of robustness, portraying it as the ability of ML models to maintain stable performance across varied and unexpected environmental conditions. The chapter delves into the factors that impede robustness, such as data bias, model complexity, and the pitfalls of underspecified ML pipelines. The discussion progresses to explore amelioration strategies for bolstering robustness, starting with data-centric approaches like debiasing and augmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T03:49:42Z)
• The Common Stability Mechanism behind most Self-Supervised Learning Approaches [64.40701218561921]
  We provide a framework to explain the stability mechanism of different self-supervised learning techniques. We discuss the working mechanism of contrastive techniques like SimCLR, non-contrastive techniques like BYOL, SWAV, SimSiam, Barlow Twins, and DINO. We formulate different hypotheses and test them using the Imagenet100 dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T20:36:24Z)
• Analyzing Adversarial Inputs in Deep Reinforcement Learning [53.3760591018817]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of the characterization of adversarial inputs, through the lens of formal verification. We introduce a novel metric, the Adversarial Rate, to classify models based on their susceptibility to such perturbations. Our analysis empirically demonstrates how adversarial inputs can affect the safety of a given DRL system with respect to such perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T21:58:40Z)
• SA-Attack: Improving Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Pre-training Models via Self-Augmentation [56.622250514119294]
  In contrast to white-box adversarial attacks, transfer attacks are more reflective of real-world scenarios. We propose a self-augment-based transfer attack method, termed SA-Attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T09:08:50Z)
• Robustness and Generalization Performance of Deep Learning Models on Cyber-Physical Systems: A Comparative Study [71.84852429039881]
  Investigation focuses on the models' ability to handle a range of perturbations, such as sensor faults and noise. We test the generalization and transfer learning capabilities of these models by exposing them to out-of-distribution (OOD) samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T12:43:59Z)
• Exploring the Vulnerabilities of Machine Learning and Quantum Machine Learning to Adversarial Attacks using a Malware Dataset: A Comparative Analysis [0.0]
  Machine learning (ML) and quantum machine learning (QML) have shown remarkable potential in tackling complex problems. Their susceptibility to adversarial attacks raises concerns when deploying these systems in security sensitive applications. We present a comparative analysis of the vulnerability of ML and QNN models to adversarial attacks using a malware dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T06:31:42Z)
• On the Robustness of Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis: Rethinking Model, Data, and Training [109.9218185711916]
  Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) aims at automatically inferring the specific sentiment polarities toward certain aspects of products or services behind social media texts or reviews. We propose to enhance the ABSA robustness by systematically rethinking the bottlenecks from all possible angles, including model, data, and training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T11:07:43Z)
• Survey on Deep Fuzzy Systems in regression applications: a view on interpretability [1.2158275183241178]
  Regression problems have been more and more embraced by deep learning (DL) techniques. Accessing the interpretability of these models is an essential factor for addressing problems in sensitive areas. This paper aims to investigate the state-of-the-art on existing methodologies that combine DL and FLS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-09T10:40:31Z)
• ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models [64.03398193325572]
  Inference attacks against Machine Learning (ML) models allow adversaries to learn about training data, model parameters, etc. We concentrate on four attacks - namely, membership inference, model inversion, attribute inference, and model stealing. Our analysis relies on a modular re-usable software, ML-Doctor, which enables ML model owners to assess the risks of deploying their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-04T11:35:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.