Disrupting Cognitive Passivity: Rethinking AI-Assisted Data Literacy through Cognitive Alignment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02783v1
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 06:47:55 GMT
- Title: Disrupting Cognitive Passivity: Rethinking AI-Assisted Data Literacy through Cognitive Alignment
- Abstract summary: We argue that disrupting cognitive passivity requires more dynamic and adaptive strategy through cognitive alignment.<n>In the framework, we provide the mapping between AI's interaction mode (transmissive or deliberative) and users' cognitive demand (receptive or deliberative)
- Score: 17.265229093607676
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: AI chatbots are increasingly stepping into roles as collaborators or teachers in analyzing, visualizing, and reasoning through data and domain problem. Yet, AI's default assistant mode with its comprehensive and one-off responses may undermine opportunities for practitioners to develop literacy through their own thinking, inducing cognitive passivity. Drawing on evidence from empirical studies and theories, we argue that disrupting cognitive passivity necessitates a nuanced approach: rather than simply making AI promote deliberative thinking, there is a need for more dynamic and adaptive strategy through cognitive alignment -- a framework that characterizes effective human-AI interaction as a function of alignment between users' cognitive demand and AI's interaction mode. In the framework, we provide the mapping between AI's interaction mode (transmissive or deliberative) and users' cognitive demand (receptive or deliberative), otherwise leading to either cognitive passivity or friction. We further discuss implications and offer open questions for future research on data literacy.
Related papers
- Critical Thinking in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Survey-Based Study with Machine Learning Insights [1.5223740593989443]
This paper investigates the relationship between AI-use behavior and critical-thinking performance.<n>It shows that reduced patience and stronger dependence-related tendencies are more closely associated with lower reasoning performance than background characteristics alone.<n>It argues that effective human-AI collaboration should support reflection, verification, and sustained cognitive effort rather than substitute for them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-18T03:22:44Z) - Who Is Doing the Thinking? AI as a Dynamic Cognitive Partner: A Learner-Informed Framework [0.0]
This study proposes a framework positioning AI as a dynamic cognitive partner whose function shifts across learning situations.<n>We identified nine interrelated dimensions through which learners described AI as partnering with their cognition.<n>Students distinguished between productive support that extends understanding and unproductive reliance that replaces cognitive effort, indicating situational awareness of when AI should and should not be used.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-17T15:07:06Z) - AI as Teammate or Tool? A Review of Human-AI Interaction in Decision Support [0.514825619161626]
Current AI systems remain largely passive due to an overreliance on explainability-centric designs.<n> transitioning AI to an active teammate requires adaptive, context-aware interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-26T19:18:50Z) - Bridging Minds and Machines: Toward an Integration of AI and Cognitive Science [48.38628297686686]
Cognitive Science has profoundly shaped disciplines such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience, Linguistics, and Culture.<n>Many breakthroughs in AI trace their roots to cognitive theories, while AI itself has become an indispensable tool for advancing cognitive research.<n>We argue that the future of AI within Cognitive Science lies not only in improving performance but also in constructing systems that deepen our understanding of the human mind.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-28T11:26:17Z) - When Models Know More Than They Can Explain: Quantifying Knowledge Transfer in Human-AI Collaboration [79.69935257008467]
We introduce Knowledge Integration and Transfer Evaluation (KITE), a conceptual and experimental framework for Human-AI knowledge transfer capabilities.<n>We conduct the first large-scale human study (N=118) explicitly designed to measure it.<n>In our two-phase setup, humans first ideate with an AI on problem-solving strategies, then independently implement solutions, isolating model explanations' influence on human understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T20:48:16Z) - Exploring Societal Concerns and Perceptions of AI: A Thematic Analysis through the Lens of Problem-Seeking [0.0]
This study introduces a novel conceptual framework distinguishing problem-seeking from problem-solving to clarify the unique features of human intelligence in contrast to AI.<n>The framework emphasizes that while AI excels at efficiency and optimization, it lacks the orientation derived from grounding and the embodiment flexibility intrinsic to human cognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T18:24:34Z) - Navigating the State of Cognitive Flow: Context-Aware AI Interventions for Effective Reasoning Support [6.758533259752144]
Flow theory describes an optimal cognitive state where individuals experience deep focus and intrinsic motivation.<n>In AI-augmented reasoning, interventions that disrupt the state of cognitive flow can hinder rather than enhance decision-making.<n>This paper proposes a context-aware cognitive augmentation framework that adapts interventions based on type, timing, and scale.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-22T16:35:39Z) - Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z) - Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
We examine what is known about human wisdom and sketch a vision of its AI counterpart.<n>We argue that AI systems particularly struggle with metacognition.<n>We discuss how wise AI might be benchmarked, trained, and implemented.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z) - Towards Human-AI Deliberation: Design and Evaluation of LLM-Empowered Deliberative AI for AI-Assisted Decision-Making [47.33241893184721]
In AI-assisted decision-making, humans often passively review AI's suggestion and decide whether to accept or reject it as a whole.<n>We propose Human-AI Deliberation, a novel framework to promote human reflection and discussion on conflicting human-AI opinions in decision-making.<n>Based on theories in human deliberation, this framework engages humans and AI in dimension-level opinion elicitation, deliberative discussion, and decision updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-25T14:34:06Z) - Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic
Systems [67.01132165581667]
We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components.
We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z) - Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: A taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review [6.013543974938446]
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in decision support systems has disproportionately focused on technological advancements.
A human-centered perspective attempts to alleviate this concern by designing AI solutions for seamless integration with existing processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T17:46:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.