Rubrics to Tokens: Bridging Response-level Rubrics and Token-level Rewards in Instruction Following Tasks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02795v1
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 07:02:57 GMT
- Title: Rubrics to Tokens: Bridging Response-level Rubrics and Token-level Rewards in Instruction Following Tasks
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a promising approach for aligning Large Language Models with complex, open-domain instruction following tasks.<n>Existing methods predominantly rely on response-level rewards, introducing severe reward sparsity and reward ambiguity problems.<n>We propose a novel rubric-based RL framework that bridges coarse response-level scores and fine-grained token-level credit assignment.
- Score: 30.108876878365496
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Rubric-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a promising approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with complex, open-domain instruction following tasks. However, existing methods predominantly rely on response-level rewards, introducing severe reward sparsity and reward ambiguity problems. To address these issues, we propose Rubrics to Tokens (RTT), a novel rubric-based RL framework that bridges coarse response-level scores and fine-grained token-level credit assignment. RTT introduces a Token-Level Relevance Discriminator to predict which tokens in the response are responsible for a specific constraint, and optimizes the policy model via RTT-GRPO, which integrates response-level and token-level advantages within a unified framework. Furthermore, when transitioning from one-dimensional, outcome-level reward to three-dimensional reward space in the token-level rubric-based RL, we propose a novel group normalization method, called Intra-sample Token Group Normalization, to accommodate this shift. Extensive experiments and benchmarks demonstrate that RTT consistently outperforms other baselines in both instruction- and rubric-level accuracy across different models.
Related papers
- CoRT: Counterfactual Replay for Token-Level Rubric-Guided Policy Optimization [21.755134237801443]
CoRT is a token-level credit weighting method for rubric-conditioned GRPO.<n>We show that CoRT improves over matched response-level GRPO in the vast majority of comparisons.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-28T12:45:19Z) - Token-Level Off-Policy Learning for Faithful Generation Under Distribution Shift [26.752668789722765]
Token-Level Off-Policy Labeling (TOPL) is an off-policy training paradigm that reframes post-training as a token-level correctness prediction task.<n>We show TOPL achieves strong out-of-distribution generalization across 11 datasets against a diverse set of sequence-level and token-level baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-20T03:57:22Z) - ExTra: Exploratory Trajectory Optimization for Language Model Reinforcement Learning [75.26064451955199]
ExTra is a framework that extracts exploration signals from the model's own rollouts.<n>It improves Qwen3-1.7B over GRPO by about +5 points on pass@1 and +7 points on pass@16.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-23T15:51:39Z) - TRACE: A Unified Rollout Budget Allocation Framework for Efficient Agentic Reinforcement Learning [52.67756371231985]
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a promising approach for enhancing reasoning and agentic behavior in large language models.<n>We introduce Tree Rollout Allocation for Contrastive Exploration (TRACE), a unified rollout allocation framework.<n>Technically, TRACE allocates rollout budget to both prompt roots and intermediate prefixes that are most likely to yield mixed terminal rewards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-09T17:16:03Z) - N-GRPO: Embedding-Level Neighbor Mixing for Enhanced Policy Optimization [55.14402862283128]
We introduce N-GRPO, a novel exploration strategy integrated into the Group Relative Policy Optimization framework.<n>Rather than relying on token-level sampling or native embedding-level noise, our approach leverages Semantic Neighbor Mixing.<n>N-GRPO achieves consistent improvements over strong baselines on math reasoning benchmarks and also exhibits robust generalization capabilities on out-of-distribution tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-09T12:21:27Z) - From Failure to Feedback: Group Revision Unlocks Hard Cases in Object-Level Grounding [35.008790179255136]
We propose a group-revision optimisation paradigm that enhances learning on hard cases.<n>Inspired by reward shaping, we introduce a consolidation process that quantifies each candidate's improvement over the initial attempt.<n>Our method achieves consistent gains across referring and reasoning segmentation, REC, and counting benchmarks compared with prior GRPO-based models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-15T13:41:41Z) - Token-Level Policy Optimization: Linking Group-Level Rewards to Token-Level Aggregation via Sequence-Level Likelihood [9.53011880338711]
We propose TEPO, a novel token-level framework that leverages sequence-level likelihood to link group-level rewards with individual tokens.<n>Experiments demonstrate that TEPO achieves state-of-the-art performance on mathematical reasoning benchmarks.<n>It also markedly enhances training stability, reducing convergence time by 50% compared with GRPO/DAPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T13:50:31Z) - From Absolute to Relative: Rethinking Reward Shaping in Group-Based Reinforcement Learning [7.6602542594279335]
We propose Reinforcement Learning with Relative Rewards to shift reward shaping from absolute scoring to relative ranking.<n>We show that RLRR yields consistent performance improvements over standard group-based baselines across reasoning benchmarks and open-ended generation tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T15:07:06Z) - Owen-Shapley Policy Optimization (OSPO): A Principled RL Algorithm for Generative Search LLMs [12.75200353208858]
Owen-Shapley Policy Optimization (OSPO) is a framework that redistributes sequence-level advantages based on tokens' marginal contributions to outcomes.<n>Unlike value-model-based methods requiring additional computation, OSPO employs potential-based reward shaping via Shapley-Owen attributions to assign segment-level credit.<n> Experiments on Amazon ESCI and H&M Fashion datasets show consistent gains over baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-13T10:17:46Z) - KBQA-R1: Reinforcing Large Language Models for Knowledge Base Question Answering [64.62317305868264]
We present textbfKBQA-R1, a framework that shifts the paradigm from text imitation to interaction optimization via Reinforcement Learning.<n>Treating KBQA as a multi-turn decision process, our model learns to navigate the knowledge base using a list of actions.<n>Experiments on WebQSP, GrailQA, and GraphQuestions demonstrate that KBQA-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-10T17:45:42Z) - GroupRank: A Groupwise Reranking Paradigm Driven by Reinforcement Learning [26.616849067985967]
Groupwise is a novel reranking paradigm for large language models.<n>We propose an innovative pipeline for high quality retrieval and ranking data.<n>The resulting data can be leveraged not only for training the reranker but also for training the retriever.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-10T15:25:31Z) - Token-Level Policy Optimization: Linking Group-Level Rewards to Token-Level Aggregation via Markov Likelihood [9.335167757513046]
We propose TEPO, a novel token-level framework that incorporates Markov Likelihood (sequence likelihood) links group-level rewards with tokens via token-level aggregation.<n>Experiments show that TEPO consistently outperforms existing baselines across key metrics.<n>It not only sets a new state of the art on mathematical reasoning tasks but also significantly enhances training stability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T13:25:28Z) - Intra-Trajectory Consistency for Reward Modeling [67.84522106537274]
We develop an intra-trajectory consistency regularization to enforce that adjacent processes with higher next-token generation probability maintain more consistent rewards.<n>We show that the reward model trained with the proposed regularization induces better DPO-aligned policies and achieves better best-of-N (BON) inference-time verification results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-10T12:59:14Z) - Response-Level Rewards Are All You Need for Online Reinforcement Learning in LLMs: A Mathematical Perspective [6.069069082518759]
We study the Zero-Reward Assumption in reinforcement learning for large language models (LLMs)<n>We show that the policy gradient based on true, unknown token-level rewards can be unbiasedly estimated using only a response-level reward model.<n>We propose a new algorithm: Token-Reinforced Policy Optimization (TRePO)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T07:44:31Z) - Entropy-Regularized Token-Level Policy Optimization for Language Agent Reinforcement [67.1393112206885]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise as intelligent agents in interactive decision-making tasks.
We introduce Entropy-Regularized Token-level Policy Optimization (ETPO), an entropy-augmented RL method tailored for optimizing LLMs at the token level.
We assess the effectiveness of ETPO within a simulated environment that models data science code generation as a series of multi-step interactive tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-09T07:45:26Z) - Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without
Forgetting [112.66832145320434]
We introduce a self-regularization framework for prompting called PromptSRC.
PromptSRC guides the prompts to optimize for both task-specific and task-agnostic general representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-13T17:59:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.