One Model to Translate Them All? A Journey to Mount Doom for Multilingual Model Merging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02881v1
• Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:45:26 GMT
• Title: One Model to Translate Them All? A Journey to Mount Doom for Multilingual Model Merging
• Abstract summary: We study weight-space merging for multilingual machine translation by fully fine-tuning language model.<n>Our experiments reveal that merging degrades performance, especially when target languages differ.<n>These findings suggest that multilingual fine-tuning may reshape geometry in ways that reduce compatibility with standard weight-space merging assumptions.
• Score: 30.967619128236777
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Weight-space model merging combines independently fine-tuned models without accessing original training data, offering a practical alternative to joint training. While merging succeeds in multitask settings, its behavior in multilingual contexts remains poorly understood. We systematically study weight-space merging for multilingual machine translation by fully fine-tuning language model on large-scale bilingual corpora and evaluating standard merging strategies. Our experiments reveal that merging degrades performance, especially when target languages differ. To explain this failure, we analyze internal representations using span-conditioned neuron selectivity and layer-wise centered kernel alignment. We find that language-specific neurons concentrate in embedding layers and upper transformer blocks, while intermediate layers remain largely shared across languages. Critically, fine-tuning redistributes rather than sharpens language selectivity: neurons for supervised and related languages become less exclusive, while those for unsupervised languages grow more isolated. This redistribution increases representational divergence in higher layers that govern generation. These findings suggest that multilingual fine-tuning may reshape geometry in ways that reduce compatibility with standard weight-space merging assumptions. Our work thus provides an explanation for why merging fails in multilingual translation scenarios.

Related papers

• Cross-Lingual Alignment Without Joint Training: Do Monolingual Language Models Converge on Universal Representations? [25.211096690334355]
  Cross-lingual alignment in multilingual language models is typically attributed to joint training.<n>We ask whether monolingual models trained on non-parallel data learn alignable representations without joint training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T13:27:18Z)
• When Meanings Meet: Investigating the Emergence and Quality of Shared Concept Spaces during Multilingual Language Model Training [57.230355403478995]
  We investigate the development of language-agnostic concept spaces during pretraining of EuroLLM.<n>We find that shared concept spaces emerge early and continue to refine, but that alignment with them is language-dependent.<n>In contrast to prior work, our fine-grained manual analysis reveals that some apparent gains in translation quality reflect shifts in behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T11:23:01Z)
• Tracing Multilingual Representations in LLMs with Cross-Layer Transcoders [51.380449540006985]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can process many languages, yet how they internally represent this diversity remains unclear.<n>Do they form shared multilingual representations with language-specific decoding, and if so, why does performance still favor the dominant training language?<n>We analyze their internal mechanisms using cross-layer transcoders (CLT) and attribution graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T22:51:06Z)
• False Friends Are Not Foes: Investigating Vocabulary Overlap in Multilingual Language Models [53.01170039144264]
  Subword tokenizers trained on multilingual corpora naturally produce overlapping tokens across languages.<n>Does token overlap facilitate cross-lingual transfer or instead introduce interference between languages?<n>We find that models with overlap outperform models with disjoint vocabularies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T07:47:54Z)
• Group then Scale: Dynamic Mixture-of-Experts Multilingual Language Model [38.0723521889505]
  Experimental results on 18 to 128 languages show that our method reduces the negative transfer between languages and significantly boosts multilingual performance with fewer parameters.<n>Such language group specialization on experts benefits the new language adaptation and reduces the inference on the previous multilingual knowledge learned.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T07:56:18Z)
• Mechanistic Understanding and Mitigation of Language Confusion in English-Centric Large Language Models [56.61984030508691]
  We present the first mechanistic interpretability study of language confusion.<n>We show that confusion points (CPs) are central to this phenomenon.<n>We show that editing a small set of critical neurons, identified via comparative analysis with a multilingual-tuned counterpart, substantially mitigates confusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T11:29:17Z)
• Extending Multilingual Machine Translation through Imitation Learning [60.15671816513614]
  Imit-MNMT treats the task as an imitation learning process, which mimicks the behavior of an expert. We show that our approach significantly improves the translation performance between the new and the original languages. We also demonstrate that our approach is capable of solving copy and off-target problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T21:04:03Z)
• XCOPA: A Multilingual Dataset for Causal Commonsense Reasoning [68.57658225995966]
  Cross-lingual Choice of Plausible Alternatives (XCOPA) is a typologically diverse multilingual dataset for causal commonsense reasoning in 11 languages. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art models on this novel dataset, revealing that the performance of current methods falls short compared to translation-based transfer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T12:22:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.