Understanding the Role of Hallucination in Reinforcement Post-Training of Multimodal Reasoning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03179v1
• Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 16:56:34 GMT
• Title: Understanding the Role of Hallucination in Reinforcement Post-Training of Multimodal Reasoning Models
• Abstract summary: reinforcement learning (RL) has inspired the growing adoption of RL for post-training Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to enhance their visual reasoning capabilities.<n>We propose the Hallucination-as-Cue Framework to investigate the effects of RL-based post-training on multimodal reasoning models from the perspective of model hallucination.
• Score: 54.50728814348712
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The recent success of reinforcement learning (RL) in large reasoning models has inspired the growing adoption of RL for post-training Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to enhance their visual reasoning capabilities. Although many studies have reported improved performance, it remains unclear whether RL training truly enables models to learn from visual information. In this work, we propose the Hallucination-as-Cue Framework, an analytical framework designed to investigate the effects of RL-based post-training on multimodal reasoning models from the perspective of model hallucination. Specifically, we introduce hallucination-inductive, modality-specific corruptions that remove or replace essential information required to derive correct answers, thereby forcing the model to reason by hallucination. By applying these corruptions during both training and evaluation, our framework provides a unique perspective for diagnosing RL training dynamics and understanding the intrinsic properties of datasets. Through extensive experiments and analyses across multiple multimodal reasoning benchmarks, we reveal that the role of model hallucination for RL-training is more significant than previously recognized. For instance, we find that RL post-training under purely hallucination-inductive settings can still significantly improve models' reasoning performance, and in some cases even outperform standard training. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about MLLM reasoning training and motivate the development of more modality-aware RL-based training designs.

Related papers

• Learning Dynamics in RL Post-Training for Language Models [2.538209532048867]
  We analyze the learning dynamics of RL post-training from a perspective that has been studied in supervised learning but remains underexplored in RL.<n>We show that limited variability in feature representations can cause RL updates to systematically increase model confidence.<n>Motivated by these insights, we propose classifier-first reinforcement learning (CF-RL), a simple two-stage training strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T07:32:15Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning [93.00629872970364]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the dominant paradigm for improving the performance of language models on complex reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce SPARKLE, a fine-grained analytic framework to dissect the effects of RL across three key dimensions.<n>We study whether difficult problems -- those yielding no RL signals and mixed-quality reasoning traces -- can still be effectively used for training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:53:59Z)
• Reshaping Reasoning in LLMs: A Theoretical Analysis of RL Training Dynamics through Pattern Selection [35.268183415853976]
  We provide an explanation of the RL training process through empirical analysis and rigorous theoretical modeling.<n>We develop a theoretical framework to understand the training dynamics of RL with two typical rewards: reward (RLVR) and model's internal feedback (RLIF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:17:04Z)
• ProRL: Prolonged Reinforcement Learning Expands Reasoning Boundaries in Large Language Models [89.37819814048288]
  We introduce ProRL, a novel training methodology that incorporates KL divergence control, reference policy, and a diverse suite of tasks.<n>Our empirical analysis reveals that RL-trained models consistently outperform base resetting models across a wide range of pass@k evaluations.<n>These findings offer new insights into the conditions under which RL meaningfully expands reasoning boundaries in language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T17:59:01Z)
• Reasoning Models Hallucinate More: Factuality-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models [83.24079543652253]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced in reasoning tasks through reinforcement learning (RL) optimization.<n>However, reasoning-oriented RL fine-tuning significantly increases the prevalence of hallucinations.<n>We propose Factuality-aware Step-wise Policy Optimization (FSPO), an innovative RL fine-tuning algorithm incorporating explicit factuality verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T14:23:32Z)
• Behavior Injection: Preparing Language Models for Reinforcement Learning [45.744838898763554]
  We analyze the per-step influence of the RL objective and identify two key conditions for effective post-training.<n>We propose behavior injection, a task-agnostic data augmentation scheme applied prior to RL.<n>We evaluate our method across two reasoning benchmarks with multiple base models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T00:54:50Z)
• Echo Chamber: RL Post-training Amplifies Behaviors Learned in Pretraining [74.83412846804977]
  Reinforcement learning (RL)-based fine-tuning has become a crucial step in post-training language models.<n>We present a systematic end-to-end study of RL fine-tuning for mathematical reasoning by training models entirely from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T17:15:53Z)
• Unfamiliar Finetuning Examples Control How Language Models Hallucinate [75.03210107477157]
  Large language models are known to hallucinate when faced with unfamiliar queries. We find that unfamiliar examples in the models' finetuning data are crucial in shaping these errors. Our work further investigates RL finetuning strategies for improving the factuality of long-form model generations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T18:28:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.