Reshaping Reasoning in LLMs: A Theoretical Analysis of RL Training Dynamics through Pattern Selection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04695v2
• Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:07:28 GMT
• Title: Reshaping Reasoning in LLMs: A Theoretical Analysis of RL Training Dynamics through Pattern Selection
• Authors: Xingwu Chen, Tianle Li, Difan Zou,
• Abstract summary: We provide an explanation of the RL training process through empirical analysis and rigorous theoretical modeling.<n>We develop a theoretical framework to understand the training dynamics of RL with two typical rewards: reward (RLVR) and model's internal feedback (RLIF)
• Score: 35.268183415853976
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While reinforcement learning (RL) demonstrated remarkable success in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of language models, the training dynamics of RL in LLMs remain unclear. In this work, we provide an explanation of the RL training process through empirical analysis and rigorous theoretical modeling. First, through systematic reasoning-pattern-level and token-level analysis across the RL training process, we show that while different reasoning patterns exhibit relatively stable success rates during training, RL primarily optimizes a sparse subset of critical tokens, thereby reshaping reasoning pattern distributions to affect model performance. Building on these empirical insights, we develop a theoretical framework to understand the training dynamics of RL with two typical rewards: verifiable reward (RLVR) and model's internal feedback (RLIF). For RLVR, we analyze the training dynamics under two special cases: one where models readily converge to optimal reasoning strategies, and another where optimization becomes challenging, revealing that the base model's reasoning quality is crucial for determining convergence behavior. For RLIF, we examine how internal rewards initially improve model performance but can potentially lead to degradation with continued training. Extensive experiments validate our findings, advancing both theoretical understanding and practical applications of RL in language model enhancement.

Related papers

• Learning Dynamics in RL Post-Training for Language Models [2.538209532048867]
  We analyze the learning dynamics of RL post-training from a perspective that has been studied in supervised learning but remains underexplored in RL.<n>We show that limited variability in feature representations can cause RL updates to systematically increase model confidence.<n>Motivated by these insights, we propose classifier-first reinforcement learning (CF-RL), a simple two-stage training strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T07:32:15Z)
• How and Why LLMs Generalize: A Fine-Grained Analysis of LLM Reasoning from Cognitive Behaviors to Low-Level Patterns [51.02752099869218]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) display strikingly different generalization behaviors.<n>We introduce a novel benchmark that decomposes reasoning into atomic core skills.<n>We show that RL-tuned models maintain more stable behavioral profiles and resist collapse in reasoning skills, whereas SFT models exhibit sharper drift and overfit to surface patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T08:16:20Z)
• On the Interplay of Pre-Training, Mid-Training, and RL on Reasoning Language Models [73.10315509190623]
  Recent reinforcement learning techniques have yielded impressive reasoning improvements in language models.<n>It remains unclear whether post-training truly extends a model's reasoning ability beyond what it acquires during pre-training.<n>We develop a fully controlled experimental framework that isolates the causal contributions of pre-training, mid-training, and RL-based post-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T18:12:10Z)
• No Free Lunch: Rethinking Internal Feedback for LLM Reasoning [12.881043910316787]
  Reinforcement learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for post-training large language models (LLMs) to improve reasoning.<n>We investigate an alternative class of methods, Reinforcement Learning from Internal Feedback (RLIF), which relies solely on intrinsic model-derived signals instead of external rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T17:59:52Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning [82.43575191712726]
  We introduce a fine-grained analytic framework to dissect the impact ofReinforcement learning on reasoning.<n>Our framework specifically investigates key elements that have been hypothesized to benefit from RL training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:53:59Z)
• RAST: Reasoning Activation in LLMs via Small-model Transfer [33.32587030836428]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a powerful approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>Applying RL at scale remains intimidatingly resource-intensive, requiring multiple model copies and extensive GPU workloads.<n>We propose RAST, a simple yet effective method that transfers reasoning behaviors by injecting RL-induced probability adjustments from a small RL-trained model into larger models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T17:57:08Z)
• The Hallucination Dilemma: Factuality-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models [63.98194996746229]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced in reasoning tasks through reinforcement learning (RL) optimization.<n>However, reasoning-oriented RL fine-tuning significantly increases the prevalence of hallucinations.<n>We propose Factuality-aware Step-wise Policy Optimization (FSPO), an innovative RL fine-tuning algorithm incorporating explicit factuality verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T14:23:32Z)
• Behavior Injection: Preparing Language Models for Reinforcement Learning [24.46625106928253]
  Reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) has emerged as a powerful post-training technique to incentivize the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs)<n>LLMs can respond very inconsistently to RFT: some show substantial performance gains, while others plateau or even degrade.<n>We propose behavior injection, a task-agnostic data-augmentation scheme applied prior to RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T00:54:50Z)
• LARES: Latent Reasoning for Sequential Recommendation [96.26996622771593]
  We present LARES, a novel and scalable LAtent REasoning framework for Sequential recommendation.<n>Our proposed approach employs a recurrent architecture that allows flexible expansion of reasoning depth without increasing parameter complexity.<n>Our framework exhibits seamless compatibility with existing advanced models, further improving their recommendation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T16:22:54Z)
• Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model? [67.30809748319486]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has recently demonstrated notable success in enhancing the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs)<n>This study critically examines the current state of RLVR.<n>We find that the current training setup does not elicit fundamentally new reasoning patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-18T17:59:56Z)
• Echo Chamber: RL Post-training Amplifies Behaviors Learned in Pretraining [74.83412846804977]
  Reinforcement learning (RL)-based fine-tuning has become a crucial step in post-training language models.<n>We present a systematic end-to-end study of RL fine-tuning for mathematical reasoning by training models entirely from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T17:15:53Z)
• SFT or RL? An Early Investigation into Training R1-Like Reasoning Large Vision-Language Models [39.551767637896404]
  This work revisits the dominant supervised fine-tuning (SFT) then reinforcement learning (RL) paradigm for training Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>We show that SFT can significantly undermine subsequent RL by inducing pseudo reasoning paths'' imitated from expert models.<n>We introduce VLAA-Thinking, a new multimodal dataset designed to support reasoning in LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:54:05Z)
• Exploring the Effect of Reinforcement Learning on Video Understanding: Insights from SEED-Bench-R1 [53.894789613838654]
  We introduce SEED-Bench-R1, a benchmark designed to evaluate post-training methods for MLLMs in video understanding.<n>It includes intricate real-world videos and complex everyday planning tasks in the format of multiple-choice questions.<n>Using Qwen2-VL-Instruct-7B as a base model, we compare RL with supervised fine-tuning (SFT)<n>Our detailed analysis reveals that RL enhances visual perception but often produces less coherent reasoning chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T17:55:23Z)
• OpenVLThinker: An Early Exploration to Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative Self-Improvement [91.88062410741833]
  This study investigates whether similar reasoning capabilities can be successfully integrated into large vision-language models (LVLMs)<n>We consider an approach that iteratively leverages supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on lightweight training data and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to further improve model generalization.<n>OpenVLThinker, a LVLM exhibiting consistently improved reasoning performance on challenging benchmarks such as MathVista, MathVerse, and MathVision, demonstrates the potential of our strategy for robust vision-language reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:52:43Z)
• Latent Variable Representation for Reinforcement Learning [131.03944557979725]
  It remains unclear theoretically and empirically how latent variable models may facilitate learning, planning, and exploration to improve the sample efficiency of model-based reinforcement learning. We provide a representation view of the latent variable models for state-action value functions, which allows both tractable variational learning algorithm and effective implementation of the optimism/pessimism principle. In particular, we propose a computationally efficient planning algorithm with UCB exploration by incorporating kernel embeddings of latent variable models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-17T00:26:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.