Debiased Machine Learning for Conformal Prediction of Counterfactual Outcomes Under Runtime Confounding
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03772v1
- Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2026 15:49:41 GMT
- Title: Debiased Machine Learning for Conformal Prediction of Counterfactual Outcomes Under Runtime Confounding
- Abstract summary: We introduce a machine learning framework that allows for valid prediction intervals when only a subset of confounders is measured in the target population.<n>We show the resulting prediction intervals achieve desired coverage rates with faster convergence compared to standard methods.
- Score: 0.9099663022952496
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Data-driven decision making frequently relies on predicting counterfactual outcomes. In practice, researchers commonly train counterfactual prediction models on a source dataset to inform decisions on a possibly separate target population. Conformal prediction has arisen as a popular method for producing assumption-lean prediction intervals for counterfactual outcomes that would arise under different treatment decisions in the target population of interest. However, existing methods require that every confounding factor of the treatment-outcome relationship used for training on the source data is additionally measured in the target population, risking miscoverage if important confounders are unmeasured in the target population. In this paper, we introduce a computationally efficient debiased machine learning framework that allows for valid prediction intervals when only a subset of confounders is measured in the target population, a common challenge referred to as runtime confounding. Grounded in semiparametric efficiency theory, we show the resulting prediction intervals achieve desired coverage rates with faster convergence compared to standard methods. Through numerous synthetic and semi-synthetic experiments, we demonstrate the utility of our proposed method.
Related papers
- Multiply Robust Conformal Risk Control with Coarsened Data [0.0]
Conformal Prediction (CP) has recently received a tremendous amount of interest.<n>In this paper, we consider the general problem of obtaining distribution-free valid prediction regions for an outcome given coarsened data.<n>Our principled use of semiparametric theory has the key advantage of facilitating flexible machine learning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-21T12:14:44Z) - Joint Prediction Regions for time-series models [0.0]
It is an easy task to compute Joint Prediction regions (JPR) when the data is IID.
This project aims to implement Wolf and Wunderli's method for constructing JPRs and compare it with other methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T02:38:49Z) - UTOPIA: Universally Trainable Optimal Prediction Intervals Aggregation [9.387706860375461]
We introduce a novel strategy called Universally Trainable Optimal Predictive Intervals Aggregation (UTOPIA)
This technique excels in efficiently aggregating multiple prediction intervals while maintaining a small average width of the prediction band and ensuring coverage.
It is validated through its application to synthetic data and two real-world datasets in finance and macroeconomics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-28T20:38:37Z) - Prediction-Powered Inference [68.97619568620709]
Prediction-powered inference is a framework for performing valid statistical inference when an experimental dataset is supplemented with predictions from a machine-learning system.
The framework yields simple algorithms for computing provably valid confidence intervals for quantities such as means, quantiles, and linear and logistic regression coefficients.
Prediction-powered inference could enable researchers to draw valid and more data-efficient conclusions using machine learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-23T18:59:28Z) - Test-time Collective Prediction [73.74982509510961]
Multiple parties in machine learning want to jointly make predictions on future test points.
Agents wish to benefit from the collective expertise of the full set of agents, but may not be willing to release their data or model parameters.
We explore a decentralized mechanism to make collective predictions at test time, leveraging each agent's pre-trained model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-22T18:29:58Z) - Double Robust Representation Learning for Counterfactual Prediction [68.78210173955001]
We propose a novel scalable method to learn double-robust representations for counterfactual predictions.
We make robust and efficient counterfactual predictions for both individual and average treatment effects.
The algorithm shows competitive performance with the state-of-the-art on real world and synthetic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-15T16:39:26Z) - Counterfactual Predictions under Runtime Confounding [74.90756694584839]
We study the counterfactual prediction task in the setting where all relevant factors are captured in the historical data.
We propose a doubly-robust procedure for learning counterfactual prediction models in this setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-30T15:49:05Z) - Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials.
We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z) - Performance metrics for intervention-triggering prediction models do not
reflect an expected reduction in outcomes from using the model [71.9860741092209]
Clinical researchers often select among and evaluate risk prediction models.
Standard metrics calculated from retrospective data are only related to model utility under certain assumptions.
When predictions are delivered repeatedly throughout time, the relationship between standard metrics and utility is further complicated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-02T16:26:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.