Which English Do LLMs Prefer? Triangulating Structural Bias Towards American English in Foundation Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04204v1
• Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2026 17:59:34 GMT
• Title: Which English Do LLMs Prefer? Triangulating Structural Bias Towards American English in Foundation Models
• Abstract summary: We investigate how geopolitical histories of data curation, digital dominance, and linguistic standardization shape the large language models (LLMs) development pipeline.<n>We construct a curated corpus of 1,813 AmE--BrE variants and introduce DiAlign, a training-free method for estimating dialectal alignment.<n>We find that contemporary LLMs privilege AmE as the de facto norm, raising concerns about linguistic homogenization, epistemic injustice, and inequity in global AI deployment.
• Score: 12.338320566839483
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, yet they expose only limited language settings, most notably "English (US)," despite the global diversity and colonial history of English. Through a postcolonial framing to explain the broader significance, we investigate how geopolitical histories of data curation, digital dominance, and linguistic standardization shape the LLM development pipeline. Focusing on two dominant standard varieties, American English (AmE) and British English (BrE), we construct a curated corpus of 1,813 AmE--BrE variants and introduce DiAlign, a dynamic, training-free method for estimating dialectal alignment using distributional evidence. We operationalize structural bias by triangulating evidence across three stages: (i) audits of six major pretraining corpora reveal systematic skew toward AmE, (ii) tokenizer analyses show that BrE forms incur higher segmentation costs, and (iii) generative evaluations show a persistent AmE preference in model outputs. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic and multi-faceted examination of dialectal asymmetries in standard English varieties across the phases of LLM development. We find that contemporary LLMs privilege AmE as the de facto norm, raising concerns about linguistic homogenization, epistemic injustice, and inequity in global AI deployment, while motivating practical steps toward more dialectally inclusive language technologies.

Related papers

• DiaLLM: An Investigation into the Robustness-Generation Gap in English Dialect Adaptation [20.845447775728545]
  Large language models increasingly emphunderstand dialectal English, yet still emphproduce only standard, US-leaning English.<n>We introduce textbfDiaLLM, which continually pretrains three open-weight language model families on the International Corpus of English.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T17:24:27Z)
• Multilinguality of Large Language Models From a Structural Perspective [55.097821802807566]
  Large language models (LLMs) have excelled in processing multiple languages through pre- and post-training on multilingual data.<n>Our findings reveal that low-resource languages are structurally more different from English than high- and mid-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T07:18:09Z)
• Leveraging Routing Dynamics in Mixture-of-Experts Models for Efficient Language Adaptation [50.731838216268706]
  We study multilingual routing dynamics during continual pre-training of an English-centric MoE model on a multilingual corpus.<n>We find that continual multilingual pre-training leads to diffused, language-agnostic routing in early and middle layers.<n>We propose a parameter-efficient adaptation strategy that updates language-specific and shared experts in the final MoE layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T10:12:41Z)
• Shaping Schema via Language Representation as the Next Frontier for LLM Intelligence Expanding [88.11781604392606]
  This paper defines language representation as the linguistic and symbolic constructs used to map and model the real world.<n>We argue that shaping schemas through advanced language representation is the next frontier for expanding Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T02:42:29Z)
• Beyond the Final Layer: Intermediate Representations for Better Multilingual Calibration in Large Language Models [50.34755385896279]
  Confidence calibration is crucial for the reliable deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We conduct the first large-scale, systematic studies of multilingual calibration across six model families and over 100 languages.<n>We find that non-English languages suffer from systematically worse calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T16:07:15Z)
• Disparities in LLM Reasoning Accuracy and Explanations: A Case Study on African American English [66.97110551643722]
  We investigate dialectal disparities in Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning tasks.<n>We find that LLMs produce less accurate responses and simpler reasoning chains and explanations for AAE inputs.<n>These findings highlight systematic differences in how LLMs process and reason about different language varieties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T05:15:34Z)
• Enhancing Non-English Capabilities of English-Centric Large Language Models through Deep Supervision Fine-Tuning [42.166438218926274]
  We introduce a deep supervision fine-tuning method (DFT) that incorporates additional supervision in the internal layers of the model to guide its workflow.<n>Our method guides the model to not only consider the final generated result when processing non-English inputs but also ensure the accuracy of internal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T07:59:32Z)
• Do Large Language Models Have an English Accent? Evaluating and Improving the Naturalness of Multilingual LLMs [13.558778781305998]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are predominantly designed with English as the primary language.<n>Even the few that are multilingual tend to exhibit strong English-centric biases.<n>This paper introduces novel automatic corpus-level metrics to assess the lexical and syntactic naturalness of multilingual outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T12:34:17Z)
• Assessing Dialect Fairness and Robustness of Large Language Models in Reasoning Tasks [68.33068005789116]
  We introduce ReDial, a benchmark containing 1.2K+ parallel query pairs in Standardized English and AAVE.<n>We evaluate widely used models, including GPT, Claude, Llama, Mistral, and the Phi model families.<n>Our work establishes a systematic and objective framework for analyzing LLM bias in dialectal queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T18:44:23Z)
• Analyzing and Adapting Large Language Models for Few-Shot Multilingual NLU: Are We There Yet? [82.02076369811402]
  Supervised fine-tuning (SFT), supervised instruction tuning (SIT) and in-context learning (ICL) are three alternative, de facto standard approaches to few-shot learning. We present an extensive and systematic comparison of the three approaches, testing them on 6 high- and low-resource languages, three different NLU tasks, and a myriad of language and domain setups. Our observations show that supervised instruction tuning has the best trade-off between performance and resource requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T10:48:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.