A Logical-Rule Autoencoder for Interpretable Recommendations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04270v1
• Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2026 21:21:37 GMT
• Title: A Logical-Rule Autoencoder for Interpretable Recommendations
• Abstract summary: We propose a Logical-rule Interpretable Autoencoder (LIA) for collaborative filtering that is interpretable by design.<n>LIA introduces a learnable logical rule layer in which each rule neuron is equipped with a gate parameter.<n>LIA allows users to directly trace the decision process behind each recommendation.
• Score: 5.768273842489658
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Most deep learning recommendation models operate as black boxes, relying on latent representations that obscure their decision process. This lack of intrinsic interpretability raises concerns in applications that require transparency and accountability. In this work, we propose a Logical-rule Interpretable Autoencoder (LIA) for collaborative filtering that is interpretable by design. LIA introduces a learnable logical rule layer in which each rule neuron is equipped with a gate parameter that automatically selects between AND and OR operators during training, enabling the model to discover diverse logical patterns directly from data. To support functional completeness without doubling the input dimensionality, LIA encodes negation through the sign of connection weights, providing a parameter-efficient mechanism for expressing both positive and negated item conditions within each rule. By learning explicit, human-readable reconstruction rules, LIA allows users to directly trace the decision process behind each recommendation. Extensive experiments show that our method achieves improved recommendation performance over traditional baselines while remaining fully interpretable. Code and data are available at https://github.com/weibowen555/LIA.

Related papers

• From Prompting to Behavioral Alignment: Personalized LLM Judges for Recommendation Evaluation [0.0]
  This study identifies a critical failure mode termed bidirectional rationalization.<n>We develop and apply a sequential behavioral alignment framework pairing fine-tuning with preference optimization.<n>This approach achieves a 32.19% lift in Macro-F1 score over the zero-shot baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T23:06:39Z)
• Logic-Regularized Verifier Elicits Reasoning from LLMs [63.65875399266337]
  We propose LOVER, an unsupervised verifier regularized by logical rules.<n>Lover treats theverifier as a binary latent variable, utilizinginternal activations and enforcing three logical constraints.<n>Lover significantly outperforms unsupervised baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T09:03:49Z)
• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• Learning to Disentangle Latent Reasoning Rules with Language VAEs: A Systematic Study [37.52166353495979]
  This work investigates how reasoning rules can be explicitly embedded and memorised within language models.<n>We propose a complete pipeline for learning reasoning rules within Transformer-based language VAEs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T08:38:03Z)
• Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation [9.282278040339138]
  $textbfR2Rec$ is a reasoning-enhanced recommendation framework.<n>It samples interaction chains from the user-item graph and converts them into structured interaction-of-thoughts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T14:16:44Z)
• Reinforcing General Reasoning without Verifiers [47.72684162518086]
  We propose a verifier-free method (VeriFree) that bypasses answer verification and instead uses RL to directly maximize the probability of generating the reference answer.<n>VeriFree matches and even surpasses verifier-based methods on extensive evaluations across MMLU-Pro, GPQA, SuperGPQA, and math-related benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T17:56:27Z)
• LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural Language [72.87064562349742]
  We introduce LatentQA, the task of answering open-ended questions about model activations in natural language.<n>We propose Latent Interpretation Tuning (LIT), which finetunes a decoder LLM on a dataset of activations and associated question-answer pairs.<n>Our decoder also specifies a differentiable loss that we use to control models, such as debiasing models on stereotyped sentences and controlling the sentiment of generations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T18:59:33Z)
• Interpret the Internal States of Recommendation Model with Sparse Autoencoder [28.234859617081295]
  RecSAE is an automated and generalizable probing framework that interprets Recommenders with Sparse AutoEncoder.<n>It extracts interpretable latents from the internal states of recommendation models and links them to semantic concepts for interpretation.<n> RecSAE does not alter original models during interpretation and also enables targeted de-biasing to models based on interpreted results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T08:22:31Z)
• Relative Preference Optimization: Enhancing LLM Alignment through Contrasting Responses across Identical and Diverse Prompts [95.09994361995389]
  Relative Preference Optimization (RPO) is designed to discern between more and less preferred responses derived from both identical and related prompts. RPO has demonstrated a superior ability to align large language models with user preferences and to improve their adaptability during the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T22:47:57Z)
• RecExplainer: Aligning Large Language Models for Explaining Recommendation Models [50.74181089742969]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable intelligence in understanding, reasoning, and instruction following. This paper presents the initial exploration of using LLMs as surrogate models to explain black-box recommender models. To facilitate an effective alignment, we introduce three methods: behavior alignment, intention alignment, and hybrid alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T03:05:43Z)
• Certified Reinforcement Learning with Logic Guidance [78.2286146954051]
  We propose a model-free RL algorithm that enables the use of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) to formulate a goal for unknown continuous-state/action Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) The algorithm is guaranteed to synthesise a control policy whose traces satisfy the specification with maximal probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-02-02T20:09:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.