Entropy, Disagreement, and the Limits of Foundation Models in Genomics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04287v1
• Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2026 22:04:01 GMT
• Title: Entropy, Disagreement, and the Limits of Foundation Models in Genomics
• Abstract summary: We train ensembles of models on text and DNA sequences and analyze their predictions, static embeddings, and empirical Fisher information flow.<n>We show that the high entropy of genomic sequences leads to near-uniform output distributions, disagreement across models, and unstable static embeddings.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Foundation models in genomics have shown mixed success compared to their counterparts in natural language processing. Yet, the reasons for their limited effectiveness remain poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the role of entropy as a fundamental factor limiting the capacities of such models to learn from their training data and develop foundational capabilities. We train ensembles of models on text and DNA sequences and analyze their predictions, static embeddings, and empirical Fisher information flow. We show that the high entropy of genomic sequences -- from the point of view of unseen token prediction -- leads to near-uniform output distributions, disagreement across models, and unstable static embeddings, even for models that are matched in architecture, training and data. We then demonstrate that models trained on DNA concentrate Fisher information in embedding layers, seemingly failing to exploit inter-token relationships. Our results suggest that self-supervised training from sequences alone may not be applicable to genomic data, calling into question the assumptions underlying current methodologies for training genomic foundation models.

Related papers

• When Does Model Collapse Occur in Structured Interactive Learning? [9.385946237424612]
  We investigate the performance of generative models in an interactive learning environment with general interaction patterns.<n>We show that the occurrence of model collapse depends critically on the topology of the interaction graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T17:41:09Z)
• Investigating the Impact of Histopathological Foundation Models on Regressive Prediction of Homologous Recombination Deficiency [52.50039435394964]
  We systematically evaluate foundation models for regression-based tasks.<n>We extract patch-level features from whole slide images (WSI) using five state-of-the-art foundation models.<n>Models are trained to predict continuous HRD scores based on these extracted features across breast, endometrial, and lung cancer cohorts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T14:06:50Z)
• Nonparametric Data Attribution for Diffusion Models [57.820618036556084]
  Data attribution for generative models seeks to quantify the influence of individual training examples on model outputs.<n>We propose a nonparametric attribution method that operates entirely on data, measuring influence via patch-level similarity between generated and training images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T03:37:16Z)
• On conditional diffusion models for PDE simulations [53.01911265639582]
  We study score-based diffusion models for forecasting and assimilation of sparse observations. We propose an autoregressive sampling approach that significantly improves performance in forecasting. We also propose a new training strategy for conditional score-based models that achieves stable performance over a range of history lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T18:31:04Z)
• Likelihood Based Inference in Fully and Partially Observed Exponential Family Graphical Models with Intractable Normalizing Constants [4.532043501030714]
  Probabilistic graphical models that encode an underlying Markov random field are fundamental building blocks of generative modeling.<n>This paper is to demonstrate that full likelihood based analysis of these models is feasible in a computationally efficient manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-27T02:58:22Z)
• Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models [56.84592466204185]
  This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop. We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models. We present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T02:08:09Z)
• From Identifiable Causal Representations to Controllable Counterfactual Generation: A Survey on Causal Generative Modeling [17.074858228123706]
  We focus on fundamental theory, methodology, drawbacks, datasets, and metrics. We cover applications of causal generative models in fairness, privacy, out-of-distribution generalization, precision medicine, and biological sciences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T05:45:32Z)
• Causal Analysis for Robust Interpretability of Neural Networks [0.2519906683279152]
  We develop a robust interventional-based method to capture cause-effect mechanisms in pre-trained neural networks. We apply our method to vision models trained on classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T18:37:24Z)
• Measuring Causal Effects of Data Statistics on Language Model's `Factual' Predictions [59.284907093349425]
  Large amounts of training data are one of the major reasons for the high performance of state-of-the-art NLP models. We provide a language for describing how training data influences predictions, through a causal framework. Our framework bypasses the need to retrain expensive models and allows us to estimate causal effects based on observational data alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-28T17:36:24Z)
• EINNs: Epidemiologically-Informed Neural Networks [75.34199997857341]
  We introduce a new class of physics-informed neural networks-EINN-crafted for epidemic forecasting. We investigate how to leverage both the theoretical flexibility provided by mechanistic models as well as the data-driven expressability afforded by AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T18:59:03Z)
• Causality and Generalizability: Identifiability and Learning Methods [0.0]
  This thesis contributes to the research areas concerning the estimation of causal effects, causal structure learning, and distributionally robust prediction methods. We present novel and consistent linear and non-linear causal effects estimators in instrumental variable settings that employ data-dependent mean squared prediction error regularization. We propose a general framework for distributional robustness with respect to intervention-induced distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T13:12:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.