The Infinite-Dimensional Nature of Spectroscopy and Why Models Succeed, Fail, and Mislead

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04717v1
• Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 14:35:37 GMT
• Title: The Infinite-Dimensional Nature of Spectroscopy and Why Models Succeed, Fail, and Mislead
• Abstract summary: Machine learning models have achieved strikingly high accuracies in spectroscopic classification tasks.<n>Existing studies have linked these results to data preprocessing choices, noise sensitivity, and model complexity.<n>We show that these phenomena arise naturally from the intrinsic high dimensionality of spectral data.
• Score: 3.093890460224435
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning (ML) models have achieved strikingly high accuracies in spectroscopic classification tasks, often without a clear proof that those models used chemically meaningful features. Existing studies have linked these results to data preprocessing choices, noise sensitivity, and model complexity, but no unifying explanation is available so far. In this work, we show that these phenomena arise naturally from the intrinsic high dimensionality of spectral data. Using a theoretical analysis grounded in the Feldman-Hajek theorem and the concentration of measure, we show that even infinitesimal distributional differences, caused by noise, normalisation, or instrumental artefacts, may become perfectly separable in high-dimensional spaces. Through a series of specific experiments on synthetic and real fluorescence spectra, we illustrate how models can achieve near-perfect accuracy even when chemical distinctions are absent, and why feature-importance maps may highlight spectrally irrelevant regions. We provide a rigorous theoretical framework, confirm the effect experimentally, and conclude with practical recommendations for building and interpreting ML models in spectroscopy.

Related papers

• Revisiting Spectral Representations in Generative Diffusion Models [98.43552218868837]
  Diffusion models have shown remarkable performance on diverse generation tasks.<n>Recent work finds that imposing representation alignment on the hidden states of diffusion networks can both facilitate training convergence and enhance sampling quality.<n>We investigate the connection between self-supervised spectral representation learning and diffusion generative models through a shared perspective on perturbation kernels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-08T04:54:02Z)
• Provably Learning Diffusion Models under the Manifold Hypothesis: Collapse and Refine [60.669081685261965]
  Diffusion models generate high-dimensional data with remarkable quality.<n>How their training efficiently learns the score function remains theoretically unexplained.<n>We instantiate this principle as Score-induced Latent Diffusion (SiLD)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-16T16:51:10Z)
• Generative Inversion of Spectroscopic Data for Amorphous Structure Elucidation [4.908054254196327]
  We introduce GLASS, a generative framework that inverts multi-modal spectroscopic measurements into realistic atomistic structures.<n>A score-based model learns a structural prior from low-fidelity data and samples out-of-distribution structures conditioned on differentiable spectral targets.<n>We use GLASS to rationalize three contested experimental problems: paracrystallinity in amorphous silicon, a liquid-liquid phase transition in sulfur, and ball-milled amorphous ice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T13:53:40Z)
• How well can off-the-shelf LLMs elucidate molecular structures from mass spectra using chain-of-thought reasoning? [51.286853421822705]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for reasoning-intensive scientific tasks, but their capability for chemical interpretation is still unclear.<n>We introduce a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting framework and benchmark that evaluate how LLMs reason about mass spectral data to predict molecular structures.<n>Our evaluation across metrics of SMILES validity, formula consistency, and structural similarity reveals that while LLMs can produce syntactically valid and partially plausible structures, they fail to achieve chemical accuracy or link reasoning to correct molecular predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T20:08:42Z)
• Foundation Models for Discovery and Exploration in Chemical Space [57.97784111110166]
  MIST is a family of molecular foundation models trained on large unlabeled datasets.<n>We demonstrate the ability of these models to solve real-world problems across chemical space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T17:56:01Z)
• Interpretability and Generalization Bounds for Learning Spatial Physics [47.664155239439644]
  This work applies the rigor of numerical analysis for differential equations to machine learning by specifically quantifying the accuracy of applying different ML techniques.<n>We prove generalization bounds and convergence rates under finite data discretizations and restricted training data subspaces.<n>Similar lack of generalization is empirically demonstrated for deep linear models, shallow neural networks, and physics-specific DeepONets and Neural Operators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T07:25:09Z)
• Can Diffusion Models Disentangle? A Theoretical Perspective [37.21661224725838]
  This paper presents a novel theoretical framework for understanding how diffusion models can learn disentangled representations.<n>We establish identifiability conditions for general disentangled latent variable models, analyze training dynamics, and derive sample complexity bounds for disentangled latent subspace models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T20:46:18Z)
• Spectral Analysis of Diffusion Models with Application to Schedule Design [23.105365495914644]
  Diffusion models (DMs) have emerged as powerful tools for modeling complex data distributions.<n>We offer a novel analysis of the DM's inference process, introducing a comprehensive frequency response perspective.<n>We demonstrate how the proposed analysis can be leveraged to design a noise schedule that aligns effectively with the characteristics of the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T21:50:31Z)
• Smoke and Mirrors in Causal Downstream Tasks [59.90654397037007]
  This paper looks at the causal inference task of treatment effect estimation, where the outcome of interest is recorded in high-dimensional observations.<n>We compare 6 480 models fine-tuned from state-of-the-art visual backbones, and find that the sampling and modeling choices significantly affect the accuracy of the causal estimate.<n>Our results suggest that future benchmarks should carefully consider real downstream scientific questions, especially causal ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T13:26:34Z)
• Generative structured normalizing flow Gaussian processes applied to spectroscopic data [4.0773490083614075]
  In the physical sciences, limited training data may not adequately characterize future observed data. It is critical that models adequately indicate uncertainty, particularly when they may be asked to extrapolate. We demonstrate the methodology on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy data from the ChemCam instrument onboard the Mars rover Curiosity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T23:57:46Z)
• Neural density estimation and uncertainty quantification for laser induced breakdown spectroscopy spectra [4.698576003197588]
  We use normalizing flows on structured spectral latent spaces to estimate probability densities. We evaluate a method for uncertainty quantification when predicting unobserved state vectors. We demonstrate the capability of this approach on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy data collected by the Mars rover Curiosity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-17T01:10:29Z)
• Cycle-StarNet: Bridging the gap between theory and data by leveraging large datasets [0.0]
  Current automated methods for analyzing spectra are either (a) data-driven, which requires prior knowledge of stellar parameters and elemental abundances, or (b) based on theoretical synthetic models that are susceptible to the gap between theory and practice. We present a hybrid generative domain adaptation method that turns simulated stellar spectra into realistic spectra by applying unsupervised learning to large spectroscopic surveys.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-06T23:06:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.