Governance-Aware Agent Telemetry for Closed-Loop Enforcement in Multi-Agent AI Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05119v1
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 19:30:37 GMT
- Title: Governance-Aware Agent Telemetry for Closed-Loop Enforcement in Multi-Agent AI Systems
- Abstract summary: OpenTelemetry and Langfuse collect telemetry but treat governance as a downstream analytics concern, not a real-time enforcement target.<n>We present Governance-Aware Agent Telemetry (ATGA), a reference architecture that closes the loop between telemetry collection and automated policy enforcement.
- Score: 9.74681037042927
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Enterprise multi-agent AI systems produce thousands of inter-agent interactions per hour, yet existing observability tools capture these dependencies without enforcing anything. OpenTelemetry and Langfuse collect telemetry but treat governance as a downstream analytics concern, not a real-time enforcement target. The result is an "observe-but-do-not-act" gap where policy violations are detected only after damage is done. We present Governance-Aware Agent Telemetry (GAAT), a reference architecture that closes the loop between telemetry collection and automated policy enforcement for multi-agent systems. GAAT introduces (1) a Governance Telemetry Schema (GTS) extending OpenTelemetry with governance attributes; (2) a real-time policy violation detection engine using OPA-compatible declarative rules under sub-200 ms latency; (3) a Governance Enforcement Bus (GEB) with graduated interventions; and (4) a Trusted Telemetry Plane with cryptographic provenance.
Related papers
- ROPE: Routed Origin Policy Enforcement against Indirect Prompt Injection [61.4148196085256]
We present ROPE (Routed Origin Policy Enforcement), which is anchored in a structural notion of trust.<n>Our approach admits two provable guarantees: 1) at every step of a trajectory, no value whose only origin is attacker-writable content reaches an origin-guarded parameter, and 2) no rewording of an injection changes an admission decision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-27T01:22:14Z) - MA-HEAD-Net: Adaptive Rule-Guided Multi-Agent DRL for AoI Minimization in UAV-Assisted Emergency Networks [71.01350912967922]
In post-disaster scenarios, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are critical for establishing emergency communication networks.<n>This paper investigates age of information (AoI) minimization for UAV-assisted emergency communications with heterogeneous emergency services.<n>We develop MA-HEAD-Net, an adaptive rule-guided multi-agent deep reinforcement learning framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-02T10:05:50Z) - Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems [0.7919969809015938]
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Artificial Intelligent (AI) powered autonomous agents has fundamentally changed the existing forms of software governance.<n>Current solutions fail to protect unbound state space agentic architecture from serious threats such as alignment, security concerns, and unauthorized deployment of shadow AI systems.<n>A solution is proposed for overcoming the discussed challenges in form of a coherent multi-level AI governance stack Traccia built on the top of OpenTelemetry infrastructure platform.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-15T19:14:21Z) - A hardware-safety-gated system for LLM-written native ARTIQ control code on a trapped-ion platform [18.226528651110133]
Large-language-model (LLM) agents can write and run experimental control code.<n>Unchecked code can damage the apparatus, and there is no formal, per-operation boundary between human authorization/supervision, and agent decisions.<n>We present a control system that places an LLM agent in the loop of a trapped-ion experiment while enforcing such a boundary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-25T16:19:23Z) - Securing LLM Agents Need Intent-to-Execution Integrity [49.490963596514185]
We argue that securing LLM agents requires defining an end-to-end correctness property that specifies when an agent's execution faithfully reflects the user's intent.<n>We observe that LLM agents are structurally analogous to compilers, where security violations correspond to mis-executions that do not preserve user intent.<n>We derive four integrity properties that must hold simultaneously: emphTool Integrity, emphInstruction Integrity, emphJudgment Integrity, and emphData Flow Integrity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-16T12:53:31Z) - AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environments [4.3073750462661256]
This paper proposes AI Trust OS, a governance architecture for continuous, autonomous AI observability and zero-trust compliance.<n>The framework operates through a zero-trust telemetry boundary in which ephemeral read-only probes validate structural metadata.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-06T15:14:10Z) - Willful Disobedience: Automatically Detecting Failures in Agentic Traces [2.2365938060262356]
AgentPex is an AI-powered tool designed to systematically evaluate agentic traces.<n>It extracts behavioral rules from agent prompts and system instructions, then uses these specifications to automatically evaluate traces for compliance.<n>We evaluate AgentPex on 424 traces from 2-bench across models in telecom, retail, and airline customer service.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-25T00:33:39Z) - REGAL: A Registry-Driven Architecture for Deterministic Grounding of Agentic AI in Enterprise Telemetry [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) enable new forms of agentic automation.<n>We present REGAL, a registry-driven architecture for deterministic grounding of agentic AI systems in enterprise telemetry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-03T14:13:39Z) - Evaluating Large Language Models for Time Series Anomaly Detection in Aerospace Software [46.75681367373185]
Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) is essential for ensuring the safety and reliability of aerospace software systems.<n>Large language models (LLMs) provide a promising training-free alternative to unsupervised approaches.<n>We introduce ATSADBench, the first benchmark for aerospace TSAD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-18T15:07:16Z) - DeepAgent: A General Reasoning Agent with Scalable Toolsets [111.6384541877723]
DeepAgent is an end-to-end deep reasoning agent that performs autonomous thinking, tool discovery, and action execution.<n>To address the challenges of long-horizon interactions, we introduce an autonomous memory folding mechanism that compresses past interactions into structured episodic, working, and tool memories.<n>We develop an end-to-end reinforcement learning strategy, namely ToolPO, that leverages LLM-simulated APIs and applies tool-call advantage attribution to assign fine-grained credit to the tool invocation tokens.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T16:24:01Z) - AgentSight: System-Level Observability for AI Agents Using eBPF [10.37440633887049]
Existing tools observe either an agent's high-level intent (via LLM prompts) or its low-level actions (e.g., system calls) but cannot correlate these two views.<n>We introduce AgentSight, an AgentOps observability framework that bridges this semantic gap using a hybrid approach.<n>AgentSight intercepts TLS-encrypted LLM traffic to extract semantic intent, monitors kernel events to observe system-wide effects, and causally correlates these two streams across process boundaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-02T01:43:39Z) - DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM Agents [52.92354372596197]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly central to agentic systems due to their strong reasoning and planning capabilities.<n>This interaction also introduces the risk of prompt injection attacks, where malicious inputs from external sources can mislead the agent's behavior.<n>We propose a Dynamic Rule-based Isolation Framework for Trustworthy agentic systems, which enforces both control and data-level constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-13T05:01:09Z) - ThinkGeo: Evaluating Tool-Augmented Agents for Remote Sensing Tasks [64.86209459039313]
ThinkGeo is an agentic benchmark designed to evaluate tool-augmented agents on remote sensing tasks via structured tool use and multi-step planning.<n>We implement a ReAct-style interaction loop and evaluate both open and closed-source LLMs on 486 structured agentic tasks with 1,773 expert-verified reasoning steps.<n>Our analysis reveals notable disparities in tool accuracy and planning consistency across models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T17:59:38Z) - SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z) - Monitoring ROS2: from Requirements to Autonomous Robots [58.720142291102135]
This paper provides an overview of a formal approach to generating runtime monitors for autonomous robots from requirements written in a structured natural language.
Our approach integrates the Formal Requirement Elicitation Tool (FRET) with Copilot, a runtime verification framework, through the Ogma integration tool.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-28T12:19:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.