High-dimensional reliability-based design optimization using stochastic emulators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05759v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:01:50 GMT
• Title: High-dimensional reliability-based design optimization using stochastic emulators
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a novel RBDO framework based on a simulator viewpoint.<n>Under this formulation, the system response conditioned on a given design is modeled directly through its output distribution.<n>The proposed method yields substantial computational gains, particularly in high-dimensional settings.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is traditionally formulated as a nested optimization and reliability problem. Although surrogate models are generally employed to improve efficiency, the approach remains computationally prohibitive in high-dimensional settings. This paper proposes a novel RBDO framework based on a stochastic simulator viewpoint, in which the deterministic limit-state function and the uncertainty in the model inputs are combined into a unified stochastic representation. Under this formulation, the system response conditioned on a given design is modeled directly through its output distribution, rather than through an explicit limit-state function. Stochastic emulators are constructed in the design space to approximate the conditional response distribution, enabling the semi-analytical evaluation of failure probabilities or associated quantiles without resorting to Monte Carlo simulation. Two classes of stochastic emulators are investigated, namely generalized lambda models and stochastic polynomial chaos expansions. Both approaches provide a deterministic mapping between design variables and reliability constraints, which breaks the classical double-loop structure of RBDO and allows the use of standard deterministic optimization algorithms. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated on a set of benchmark problems with dimensionality ranging from low to very high, including a case with stochastic excitation. The results are compared against a Kriging-based approach formulated in the full input space. The proposed method yields substantial computational gains, particularly in high-dimensional settings. While its efficiency is comparable to Kriging for low-dimensional problems, it significantly outperforms Kriging as the dimensionality increases.

Related papers

• Constraint-Aware Discrete Black-Box Optimization Using Tensor Decomposition [3.423332499970556]
  We propose a surrogate modeling approach based on logical decomposition that captures the structure of discrete search spaces.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed method improves sample efficiency by effectively guiding the search away from infeasible regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-08T19:05:24Z)
• Support-Proximity Augmented Diffusion Estimation for Offline Black-Box Optimization [17.43522044331905]
  We propose SPADE (Support-Proximity Augmented Diffusion Estimation), a novel framework that reimagines forward surrogate modeling through the lens of conditional generative modeling.<n>We show that SPADE achieves state-of-the-art performance across Design-Bench tasks and an LLM data mixture optimization benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T21:09:28Z)
• Variational Entropic Optimal Transport [67.76725267984578]
  We propose Variational Entropic Optimal Transport (VarEOT) for domain translation problems.<n>VarEOT is based on an exact variational reformulation of the log-partition $log mathbbE[exp(cdot)$ as a tractable generalization over an auxiliary positive normalizer.<n> Experiments on synthetic data and unpaired image-to-image translation demonstrate competitive or improved translation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T15:48:44Z)
• On the Optimal Construction of Unbiased Gradient Estimators for Zeroth-Order Optimization [57.179679246370114]
  A potential limitation of existing methods is the bias inherent in most perturbation estimators unless a stepsize is proposed.<n>We propose a novel family of unbiased gradient scaling estimators that eliminate bias while maintaining favorable construction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T18:25:43Z)
• A surrogate model for topology optimisation of elastic structures via parametric autoencoders [0.0]
  Instead of learning the parametric solution of the state (and adjoint) problems, the proposed approach devises a surrogate version of the entire optimisation pipeline.<n>The method predicts a quasi-optimal topology for a given problem configuration as a surrogate model of high-fidelity topologies optimised with the homogenisation method.<n>Different architectures are proposed and the approximation and generalisation capabilities of the resulting models are numerically evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T10:07:42Z)
• Stochastic Optimization with Optimal Importance Sampling [49.484190237840714]
  We propose an iterative-based algorithm that jointly updates the decision and the IS distribution without requiring time-scale separation between the two.<n>Our method achieves the lowest possible variable variance and guarantees global convergence under convexity of the objective and mild assumptions on the IS distribution family.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T16:10:18Z)
• Simultaneous and Meshfree Topology Optimization with Physics-informed Gaussian Processes [0.0]
  Topology optimization (TO) provides a principled mathematical approach for optimizing the performance of a structure by designing its material spatial distribution in a pre-defined domain and subject to a set of constraints. We develop a new class of TO methods based on the framework of Gaussian processes (GPs) whose mean functions are parameterized via deep neural networks. To test our method against conventional TO approaches implemented in commercial software, we evaluate it on four problems involving the minimization of dissipated power in Stokes flow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T01:01:35Z)
• Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization [7.556071491014536]
  We study an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence.<n>We show how using simple local regression, and a suitable "randomized prior" construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-15T07:55:28Z)
• Learning Unnormalized Statistical Models via Compositional Optimization [73.30514599338407]
  Noise-contrastive estimation(NCE) has been proposed by formulating the objective as the logistic loss of the real data and the artificial noise. In this paper, we study it a direct approach for optimizing the negative log-likelihood of unnormalized models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T01:18:16Z)
• A Deep Unrolling Model with Hybrid Optimization Structure for Hyperspectral Image Deconvolution [50.13564338607482]
  We propose a novel optimization framework for the hyperspectral deconvolution problem, called DeepMix.<n>It consists of three distinct modules, namely, a data consistency module, a module that enforces the effect of the handcrafted regularizers, and a denoising module.<n>This work proposes a context aware denoising module designed to sustain the advancements achieved by the cooperative efforts of the other modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-10T08:25:16Z)
• High Probability Complexity Bounds for Non-Smooth Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise [51.31435087414348]
  It is essential to theoretically guarantee that algorithms provide small objective residual with high probability. Existing methods for non-smooth convex optimization have complexity bounds with dependence on confidence level. We propose novel stepsize rules for two methods with gradient clipping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T17:54:21Z)
• Robust, Accurate Stochastic Optimization for Variational Inference [68.83746081733464]
  We show that common optimization methods lead to poor variational approximations if the problem is moderately large. Motivated by these findings, we develop a more robust and accurate optimization framework by viewing the underlying algorithm as producing a Markov chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T19:12:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.