Proof of Concept as a First-Class Architectural Decision Instrument

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05835v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 13:04:18 GMT
• Title: Proof of Concept as a First-Class Architectural Decision Instrument
• Abstract summary: Proofs of Concept (PoCs) are widely adopted practices in software engineering.<n>Despite their relevance, PoCs remain conceptually underdefined and methodologically ad hoc in both research and industry.<n>This paper provides a refined definition and astructured framework for PoC development grounded in a systematic review of academic and grey literature.<n>We argue that elevating PoCs to first-class status improves decision quality, enhances traceability, and supports more systematic learning in architectural practice.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Proofs of Concept (PoCs) are widely adopted practices in software engineering. Despite their relevance, PoCs remain conceptually underdefined and methodologically ad hoc in both research and industry, with definitions and implementation approaches that often lack clarity and consistency. This paper investigates the concept of PoCs with two complementary goals: (1) to provide a refined definition and astructured framework for PoC development grounded in a systematic review of academic and grey literature; and (2) to position PoCs as first-class architectural decision instruments rather than informal experiments or disposable artifacts. Through a systematic review of academic and grey literature we identify the key characteristics, processes, associated with PoCs and expose a significant gap the academic literature describes PoC outcomes but rarely its process. By synthesizing insights from diverse sources we propose a refined definition and a lightweight, three-phase framework (planning, execution, decision-making) that encompasses technical validation and explicit decision traceability. We also introduce the Undocumented Architectural Experiment anti-pattern, arising when PoCs influence high-impact architectural decisions without leaving durable architectural knowledge. We argue that elevating PoCs to first-class status improves decision quality, enhances traceability, and supports more systematic learning in architectural practice.

Related papers

• Beyond the Academic Monoculture: A Unified Framework and Industrial Perspective for Attributed Graph Clustering [75.50670592447219]
  Attributed Graph Clustering (AGC) is a fundamental unsupervised task that partitions nodes into cohesive groups by jointly modeling structural topology and node attributes.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive, industrially grounded review of AGC from three complementary perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-21T14:15:34Z)
• From Understanding to Creation: A Prerequisite-Free AI Literacy Course with Technical Depth Across Majors [2.1212179660694104]
  UNIV 182 is a prerequisite-free course that teaches undergraduates across majors to understand, use, evaluate, and build AI systems.<n>The paper situates this design within a comparative taxonomy of cross-major AI literacy courses and pedagogical traditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T23:18:43Z)
• Improving Scientific Document Retrieval with Academic Concept Index [47.95234352955763]
  Adapting general-domain retrievers to scientific domains is challenging due to the scarcity of large-scale domain-specific relevance annotations.<n>Recent approaches address these issues through two independent directions.<n>We introduce an academic concept index, which extracts key concepts from papers and organizes them guided by an academic taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-02T04:47:49Z)
• CLLMRec: LLM-powered Cognitive-Aware Concept Recommendation via Semantic Alignment and Prerequisite Knowledge Distillation [3.200298153814017]
  The growth of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) presents significant challenges for personalized learning, where concept is crucial.<n>Existing approaches typically rely on heterogeneous information networks or knowledge graphs to capture conceptual relationships, combined with knowledge tracing models to assess learners' cognitive states.<n>This paper proposes CLLMRec, a novel framework that leverages Large Language Models to generate personalized concept recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T08:37:39Z)
• Beyond Community Notes: A Framework for Understanding and Building Crowdsourced Context Systems [15.899619653241812]
  Social media platforms are increasingly developing features that display crowdsourced context alongside posts.<n>These systems have the potential to reshape our information ecosystem as major platforms embrace them as alternatives to top-down fact-checking.<n>Our framework integrates theoretical, design, and ethical perspectives to establish a foundation for future human-centered research on Crowdsourced Context Systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T21:17:18Z)
• Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoning [74.27548620675748]
  Compositional visual reasoning has emerged as a key research frontier in multimodal AI.<n>This survey systematically reviews 260+ papers from top venues (CVPR, ICCV, NeurIPS, ICML, ACL, etc.)<n>We then catalog 60+ benchmarks and corresponding metrics that probe compositional visual reasoning along dimensions such as grounding accuracy, chain-of-thought faithfulness, and high-resolution perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-24T11:01:51Z)
• Towards a unified framework for programming paradigms: A systematic review of classification formalisms and methodological foundations [0.0]
  This systematic literature review maps the formal foundations of programming paradigms.<n>We find that existing lack conceptual granularity, a unified formal basis, and struggle with hybrid languages.<n>We conclude that the literature reflects a significant intellectual shift away from classification towards promising formal, reconstructive frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T11:19:40Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• Coding for Intelligence from the Perspective of Category [66.14012258680992]
  Coding targets compressing and reconstructing data, and intelligence. Recent trends demonstrate the potential homogeneity of these two fields. We propose a novel problem of Coding for Intelligence from the category theory view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T07:05:44Z)
• Human as Points: Explicit Point-based 3D Human Reconstruction from Single-view RGB Images [71.91424164693422]
  We introduce an explicit point-based human reconstruction framework called HaP.<n>Our approach is featured by fully-explicit point cloud estimation, manipulation, generation, and refinement in the 3D geometric space.<n>Our results may indicate a paradigm rollback to the fully-explicit and geometry-centric algorithm design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T05:52:29Z)
• Expressiveness and machine processability of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS): An analysis of concepts and relations [0.0]
  The potential of both the expressiveness and machine processability of each Knowledge Organization System is extensively regulated by its structural rules. Ontologies explicitly define diverse types of relations, and are by their nature machine-processable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-11T12:35:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.