Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17298v2
• Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:55:54 GMT
• Title: Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoning
• Authors: Fucai Ke, Joy Hsu, Zhixi Cai, Zixian Ma, Xin Zheng, Xindi Wu, Sukai Huang, Weiqing Wang, Pari Delir Haghighi, Gholamreza Haffari, Ranjay Krishna, Jiajun Wu, Hamid Rezatofighi,
• Abstract summary: Compositional visual reasoning has emerged as a key research frontier in multimodal AI.<n>This survey systematically reviews 260+ papers from top venues (CVPR, ICCV, NeurIPS, ICML, ACL, etc.)<n>We then catalog 60+ benchmarks and corresponding metrics that probe compositional visual reasoning along dimensions such as grounding accuracy, chain-of-thought faithfulness, and high-resolution perception.
• Score: 74.27548620675748
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Compositional visual reasoning has emerged as a key research frontier in multimodal AI, aiming to endow machines with the human-like ability to decompose visual scenes, ground intermediate concepts, and perform multi-step logical inference. While early surveys focus on monolithic vision-language models or general multimodal reasoning, a dedicated synthesis of the rapidly expanding compositional visual reasoning literature is still missing. We fill this gap with a comprehensive survey spanning 2023 to 2025 that systematically reviews 260+ papers from top venues (CVPR, ICCV, NeurIPS, ICML, ACL, etc.). We first formalize core definitions and describe why compositional approaches offer advantages in cognitive alignment, semantic fidelity, robustness, interpretability, and data efficiency. Next, we trace a five-stage paradigm shift: from prompt-enhanced language-centric pipelines, through tool-enhanced LLMs and tool-enhanced VLMs, to recently minted chain-of-thought reasoning and unified agentic VLMs, highlighting their architectural designs, strengths, and limitations. We then catalog 60+ benchmarks and corresponding metrics that probe compositional visual reasoning along dimensions such as grounding accuracy, chain-of-thought faithfulness, and high-resolution perception. Drawing on these analyses, we distill key insights, identify open challenges (e.g., limitations of LLM-based reasoning, hallucination, a bias toward deductive reasoning, scalable supervision, tool integration, and benchmark limitations), and outline future directions, including world-model integration, human-AI collaborative reasoning, and richer evaluation protocols. By offering a unified taxonomy, historical roadmap, and critical outlook, this survey aims to serve as a foundational reference and inspire the next generation of compositional visual reasoning research.

Related papers

• Monet: Reasoning in Latent Visual Space Beyond Images and Language [55.424507246294326]
  "Thinking with images" has emerged as an effective paradigm for advancing visual reasoning.<n>Existing methods fall short of human-like abstract visual thinking.<n>We introduce Monet, a training framework that enables multimodal large language models to reason directly within the latent visual space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T13:46:39Z)
• From Perception to Cognition: A Survey of Vision-Language Interactive Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models [66.36007274540113]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) strive to achieve a profound, human-like understanding of and interaction with the physical world.<n>They often exhibit a shallow and incoherent integration when acquiring information (Perception) and conducting reasoning (Cognition)<n>This survey introduces a novel and unified analytical framework: From Perception to Cognition"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T18:25:40Z)
• Reasoning in Computer Vision: Taxonomy, Models, Tasks, and Methodologies [0.0]
  This survey aims to categorizing visual reasoning into five major types (relational, symbolic, temporal, causal, and commonsense)<n>We review evaluation protocols designed to assess functional correctness, structural consistency, and causal validity, and critically analyze their limitations in terms of generalizability, explanatory power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T10:53:35Z)
• VisuLogic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language Models [121.03333569013148]
  We introduce VisuLogic: a benchmark of 1,000 human-verified problems across six categories.<n>These types of questions can be evaluated to assess the visual reasoning capabilities of MLLMs from multiple perspectives.<n>Most models score below 30% accuracy-only slightly above the 25% random baseline and far below the 51.4% achieved by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T17:59:53Z)
• Envisioning Beyond the Pixels: Benchmarking Reasoning-Informed Visual Editing [84.16442052968615]
  We introduce RISEBench, the first benchmark for evaluating Reasoning-Informed viSual Editing (RISE)<n>RISEBench focuses on four key reasoning categories: Temporal, Causal, Spatial, and Logical Reasoning.<n>We conduct experiments evaluating nine prominent visual editing models, comprising both open-source and proprietary models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T17:59:56Z)
• Visualizing Thought: Conceptual Diagrams Enable Robust Planning in LMMs [59.66595230543127]
  Conceptual diagrams externalize mental models, abstracting irrelevant details to efficiently capture how entities interact.<n>Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large MultiModal Models (LMMs) predominantly reason through text.<n>We propose Visual Thinking, a generalizable framework that enables LMMs to reason through multiple chains of self-generated conceptual diagrams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T18:27:02Z)
• VERIFY: A Benchmark of Visual Explanation and Reasoning for Investigating Multimodal Reasoning Fidelity [34.29409506366145]
  VERIFY is a benchmark designed to isolate and rigorously evaluate the visual reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art MLLMs.<n>Each problem is accompanied by a human-annotated reasoning path, making it the first to provide in-depth evaluation of model decision-making processes.<n>We propose novel metrics that assess visual reasoning fidelity beyond mere accuracy, highlighting critical imbalances in current model reasoning patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T16:26:11Z)
• A Cognitive Paradigm Approach to Probe the Perception-Reasoning Interface in VLMs [3.2228025627337864]
  This paper introduces a structured evaluation framework to dissect the perception-reasoning interface in Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>We propose three distinct evaluation paradigms, mirroring human problem-solving strategies.<n>Applying this framework, we demonstrate that CA, leveraging powerful language models for reasoning over rich, independently generated descriptions, achieves new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T12:42:42Z)
• Retrieval-Based Interleaved Visual Chain-of-Thought in Real-World Driving Scenarios [69.00444996464662]
  We propose RIV-CoT, a Retrieval-Based Interleaved Visual Chain-of-Thought method that enables vision-language models to reason using visual crops corresponding to relevant entities.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that RIV-CoT improves answer accuracy by 3.1% and reasoning accuracy by 4.6% over vanilla CoT prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T18:31:16Z)
• Exploring the Effectiveness of Object-Centric Representations in Visual Question Answering: Comparative Insights with Foundation Models [24.579822095003685]
  We conduct an empirical study on representation learning for downstream Visual Question Answering (VQA)<n>We thoroughly investigate the benefits and trade-offs of OC models and alternative approaches.<n>We identify a promising path to leverage the strengths of both paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T12:26:08Z)
• Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
  We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks. We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.