All LCA models are wrong. Are some of them useful? Towards open computational LCA in ICT
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06290v1
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 14:36:56 GMT
- Title: All LCA models are wrong. Are some of them useful? Towards open computational LCA in ICT
- Abstract summary: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is increasingly used to quantify and regulate the environmental impacts of Information and Communication Technology systems.<n>Since direct biosphere measurements are complicated to perform, we claim that the environmental impact assessment of ICT relies heavily on models.<n>We argue that such systems require an extra-high level of carefulness in construction, calibration, integration, and interpretation.
- Score: 4.020492359480635
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is increasingly used to quantify and regulate the environmental impacts of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) systems. Since direct biosphere measurements are complicated to perform, we claim that the environmental impact assessment of ICT relies heavily on models. In this paper, we first revisit the fundamentals of LCA: we emphasize that ICT LCAs effectively form systems of models, and we argue that such systems require an extra-high level of carefulness in construction, calibration, integration, and interpretation. We then document how this level of rigor is challenging to achieve with current practices. This is illustrated with emblematic examples of model misuse and an analysis of structural challenges related to database choice, scope mismatches, opaque aggregation, and model integration. From this analysis, we derive four key requirements for credible ICT LCA: explicit model lineage, clearly defined model scope, end-to-end traceability, and managed non-obsolescence. Finally, we propose a framework that operationalizes these requirements using explicit dependency graphs, an open and versioned LCA-oriented model repository, automatic enforcement of integrity constraints, and a well-defined model taxonomy.
Related papers
- A Multi-Viewpoint Modeling Framework for Digital Twin Integration and Reuse with LLM-Assisted Compatibility Analysis [3.9988117849258056]
This paper introduces a multi-viewpoint integration modeling framework grounded in the Reference Model of Open Distributed Processing (RM-ODP)<n>The framework structures integration-relevant knowledge across domain, information, computational, engineering, and technology viewpoints.<n>It comprises (i) a viewpoint-structured Model Metamodel for systematic model description and discovery, and (ii) a pattern-aware Mismatch Detector that operationalizes cross-view compatibility constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-24T11:25:41Z) - Position: Weight Space Should Be a First-Class Generative AI Modality [67.10702320971893]
This paper argues that model checkpoints should be treated as a first-class data modality.<n>It argues that generative modeling in weight space should be standardized as a core machine learning primitive.<n>Our goal is to shift the community's default mindset from optimizing models per task to sampling models from learned weight distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-18T16:38:26Z) - A Survey on Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models [153.11669266922993]
Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) represent a significant frontier in embodied intelligence, aiming to bridge digital knowledge with physical-world interaction.<n>Motivated by the urgent need to address these challenges, this survey presents the first comprehensive review of Efficient Vision-Language-Action models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-27T17:57:33Z) - Human-aligned AI Model Cards with Weighted Hierarchy Architecture [5.774549987076668]
The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to a burgeoning ecosystem of specialized, domain-specific models.<n>Existing documentation frameworks, such as Model Cards and FactSheets, attempt to standardize reporting but are often static, predominantly qualitative.<n>We introduce the Comprehensive Responsible AI Model Card Framework (CRAI-MCF), a novel approach that transitions from static disclosures to actionable, human-aligned documentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-08T13:13:18Z) - Explicit modelling of subject dependency in BCI decoding [12.17288254938554]
Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) suffer from high inter-subject variability and limited labeled data.<n>We present an end-to-end approach that explicitly models the subject dependency using lightweight convolutional neural networks (CNNs) conditioned on the subject's identity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-27T10:51:42Z) - From Physics to Machine Learning and Back: Part II - Learning and Observational Bias in PHM [52.64097278841485]
Review examines how incorporating learning and observational biases through physics-informed modeling and data strategies can guide models toward physically consistent and reliable predictions.<n>Fast adaptation methods including meta-learning and few-shot learning are reviewed alongside domain generalization techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T14:15:43Z) - A Systematic Literature Review of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Code Models [2.171120568435925]
Large Language Models (LLMs) for code require significant computational resources for training and fine-tuning.<n>To address this, the research community has increasingly turned to Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT)<n>PEFT enables the adaptation of large models by updating only a small subset of parameters, rather than the entire model.<n>Our study synthesizes findings from 28 peer-reviewed papers, identifying patterns in configuration strategies and adaptation trade-offs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-29T16:19:25Z) - Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Models [79.2162092822111]
We systematically evaluate reinforcement learning (RL) and control-based methods on a suite of navigation tasks.<n>We employ a latent dynamics model using the Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) and employ it for planning.<n>Our results show that model-free RL benefits most from large amounts of high-quality data, whereas model-based planning generalizes better to unseen layouts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T18:39:41Z) - QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement.
QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights.
We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z) - GLUECons: A Generic Benchmark for Learning Under Constraints [102.78051169725455]
In this work, we create a benchmark that is a collection of nine tasks in the domains of natural language processing and computer vision.
We model external knowledge as constraints, specify the sources of the constraints for each task, and implement various models that use these constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-16T16:45:36Z) - Large Language Models with Controllable Working Memory [64.71038763708161]
Large language models (LLMs) have led to a series of breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP)
What further sets these models apart is the massive amounts of world knowledge they internalize during pretraining.
How the model's world knowledge interacts with the factual information presented in the context remains under explored.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-09T18:58:29Z) - Bottlenecks CLUB: Unifying Information-Theoretic Trade-offs Among
Complexity, Leakage, and Utility [8.782250973555026]
Bottleneck problems are an important class of optimization problems that have recently gained increasing attention in the domain of machine learning and information theory.
We propose a general family of optimization problems, termed as complexity-leakage-utility bottleneck (CLUB) model.
We show that the CLUB model generalizes all these problems as well as most other information-theoretic privacy models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-11T14:07:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.