Context-Aware Dialectal Arabic Machine Translation with Interactive Region and Register Selection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06456v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 20:54:19 GMT
• Title: Context-Aware Dialectal Arabic Machine Translation with Interactive Region and Register Selection
• Abstract summary: Current Machine Translation (MT) systems for Arabic often struggle to account for dialectal diversity.<n>We propose a context-aware framework for dialectal Arabic MT that explicitly models regional andlinguistic variation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Current Machine Translation (MT) systems for Arabic often struggle to account for dialectal diversity, frequently homogenizing dialectal inputs into Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and offering limited user control over the target vernacular. In this work, we propose a context-aware and steerable framework for dialectal Arabic MT that explicitly models regional and sociolinguistic variation. Our primary technical contribution is a Rule-Based Data Augmentation (RBDA) pipeline that expands a 3,000-sentence seed corpus into a balanced 57,000-sentence parallel dataset, covering eight regional varieties eg., Egyptian, Levantine, Gulf, etc. By fine-tuning an mT5-base model conditioned on lightweight metadata tags, our approach enables controllable generation across dialects and social registers in the translation output. Through a combination of automatic evaluation and qualitative analysis, we observe an apparent accuracy-fidelity trade-off: high-resource baselines such as NLLB (No Language Left Behind) achieve higher aggregate BLEU scores (13.75) by defaulting toward the MSA mean, while exhibiting limited dialectal specificity. In contrast, our model achieves lower BLEU scores (8.19) but produces outputs that align more closely with the intended regional varieties. Supporting qualitative evaluation, including an LLM-assisted cultural authenticity analysis, suggests improved dialectal alignment compared to baseline systems (4.80/5 vs. 1.0/5). These findings highlight the limitations of standard MT metrics for dialect-sensitive tasks and motivate the need for evaluation practices that better reflect linguistic diversity in Arabic MT.

Related papers

• Generating Adversarial Texts for Machine Translation via GRPO [9.016860740260679]
  We propose a scalable reinforcement-learning-based approach for rewriting existing source texts.<n>On WMT25, our approach substantially reduces average COMET translation quality from 0.63 to 0.48, while preserving grammaticality and readability.<n> Evaluations on the unseen WMT19-WMT24 benchmarks confirm that this behavior generalizes beyond the training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-05T12:06:59Z)
• State-of-the-Art Arabic Language Modeling with Sparse MoE Fine-Tuning and Chain-of-Thought Distillation [0.030957264235843676]
  Arabic-DeepSeek-R1 is an application-driven open-source Arabic LLM that leverages a sparse MoE backbone to address the digital equity gap for under-represented languages.<n>Our four-phase CoT distillation scheme integrates Arabic-specific linguistic verification and regional ethical norms into a 372M-token, contamination-controlled Arabic-English training mixture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T19:58:26Z)
• Benchmarking Bengali Dialectal Bias: A Multi-Stage Framework Integrating RAG-Based Translation and Human-Augmented RLAIF [0.3227658251731014]
  Large language models (LLMs) frequently exhibit performance biases against regional dialects of low-resource languages.<n>We propose a two-phase framework to evaluate dialectal bias in LLM question-answering across nine Bengali dialects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-22T18:44:57Z)
• Evaluating Extremely Low-Resource Machine Translation: A Comparative Study of ChrF++ and BLEU Metrics [69.2321983942375]
  This work presents a comparative analysis of BLEU, an n-gram-based metric, and ChrF++, a character-based metric, for MT evaluation in ELRL settings.<n>We examine how each metric responds to translation artifacts, including hallucinations, repetition, source-text copying, and diacritic (textitmatra) variations across three ELRLs: Magahi, Bhojpuri, and Chhattisgarhi.<n>While recent work often relies solely on ChrF++, our findings show that BLEU, despite its lower absolute scores, provides complementary lexical-precision insights that improve interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T14:56:42Z)
• Beyond Many-Shot Translation: Scaling In-Context Demonstrations For Low-Resource Machine Translation [49.82863380286994]
  In-context learning may offer novel ways to adapt Large Language Models for low-resource machine translation.<n>In this study, we explore scaling low-resource machine translation ICL beyond the few-shot setting to thousands of examples with long-context models.<n>Our experiments on Javanese and Sundanese show that gains from additional context saturate quickly and can degrade near the maximum context window.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T17:02:22Z)
• Beyond Literal Mapping: Benchmarking and Improving Non-Literal Translation Evaluation [57.11989521509119]
  We propose a novel agentic translation evaluation framework, centered by a reflective Core Agent that invokes specialized sub-agents.<n> Experimental results indicate the efficacy of RATE, achieving an improvement of at least 3.2 meta score compared with current metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T09:03:42Z)
• Advancing Dialectal Arabic to Modern Standard Arabic Machine Translation [22.369277951685234]
  This paper presents two core contributions to advancing DA-MSA translation for the Levantine, Egyptian, and Gulf dialects.<n>Few-shot prompting consistently outperformed zero-shot, chain-of-thought, and our proposed Ara-TEaR method.<n>For fine-tuning LLMs, a quantized Gemma2-9B model achieved a chrF++ score of 49.88, outperforming zero-shot GPT-4o (44.58)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-27T14:37:53Z)
• LLM-Based Evaluation of Low-Resource Machine Translation: A Reference-less Dialect Guided Approach with a Refined Sylheti-English Benchmark [1.3927943269211591]
  We propose a comprehensive framework that enhances Large Language Models (LLMs)-based machine translation evaluation.<n>We extend the ONUBAD dataset by incorporating Sylheti-English sentence pairs, corresponding machine translations, and Direct Assessment (DA) scores annotated by native speakers.<n>Our evaluation shows that the proposed pipeline consistently outperforms existing methods, achieving the highest gain of +0.1083 in Spearman correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T07:24:13Z)
• Salute the Classic: Revisiting Challenges of Machine Translation in the Age of Large Language Models [91.6543868677356]
  The evolution of Neural Machine Translation has been influenced by six core challenges. These challenges include domain mismatch, amount of parallel data, rare word prediction, translation of long sentences, attention model as word alignment, and sub-optimal beam search. This study revisits these challenges, offering insights into their ongoing relevance in the context of advanced Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T13:30:09Z)
• When Does Translation Require Context? A Data-driven, Multilingual Exploration [71.43817945875433]
  proper handling of discourse significantly contributes to the quality of machine translation (MT) Recent works in context-aware MT attempt to target a small set of discourse phenomena during evaluation. We develop the Multilingual Discourse-Aware benchmark, a series of taggers that identify and evaluate model performance on discourse phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-15T17:29:30Z)
• Decoding and Diversity in Machine Translation [90.33636694717954]
  We characterize differences between cost diversity paid for the BLEU scores enjoyed by NMT. Our study implicates search as a salient source of known bias when translating gender pronouns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-26T21:09:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.