Restoring Heterogeneity in LLM-based Social Simulation: An Audience Segmentation Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06663v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 04:29:08 GMT
• Title: Restoring Heterogeneity in LLM-based Social Simulation: An Audience Segmentation Approach
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate social attitudes and behaviors.<n>Current simulation practice often collapses diversity into an "average persona," masking subgroup variation that is central to social reality.<n>This study introduces audience segmentation as a systematic approach for restoring heterogeneity in LLM-based social simulation.
• Score: 1.8505047763172107
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate social attitudes and behaviors, offering scalable "silicon samples" that can approximate human data. However, current simulation practice often collapses diversity into an "average persona," masking subgroup variation that is central to social reality. This study introduces audience segmentation as a systematic approach for restoring heterogeneity in LLM-based social simulation. Using U.S. climate-opinion survey data, we compare six segmentation configurations across two open-weight LLMs (Llama 3.1-70B and Mixtral 8x22B), varying segmentation identifier granularity, parsimony, and selection logic (theory-driven, data-driven, and instrument-based). We evaluate simulation performance with a three-dimensional evaluation framework covering distributional, structural, and predictive fidelity. Results show that increasing identifier granularity does not produce consistent improvement: moderate enrichment can improve performance, but further expansion does not reliably help and can worsen structural and predictive fidelity. Across parsimony comparisons, compact configurations often match or outperform more comprehensive alternatives, especially in structural and predictive fidelity, while distributional fidelity remains metric dependent. Identifier selection logic determines which fidelity dimension benefits most: instrument-based selection best preserves distributional shape, whereas data-driven selection best recovers between-group structure and identifier-outcome associations. Overall, no single configuration dominates all dimensions, and performance gains in one dimension can coincide with losses in another. These findings position audience segmentation as a core methodological approach for valid LLM-based social simulation and highlight the need for heterogeneity-aware evaluation and variance-preserving modeling strategies.

Related papers

• Every Token Counts: Exact Likert-Scale Distributions for Measuring LLM Attitudes and Biases [0.0]
  We introduce an analytically exact framework for the controlled behavioral evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We replace unstructured prompting with fully crossed factorial experiments to systematically isolate causal main and interaction effects.<n>We derive a multivariate ordinal consensus metric and a distributional ANOVA to process these PMFs analytically.<n>We validate our framework with a case study on consumer ethnocentrism across five LLMs, demonstrating how our approach isolates systemic country-of-origin biases that aggregate benchmarks otherwise obscure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T05:20:06Z)
• Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihood [53.29070892356214]
  We propose jointly learning individual feature and sample relevancies, enabling simultaneous model and data sparsification.<n>This symmetric pruning of model and data offers a natural extension that preserves conjugacy.<n> Empirical results across diverse regression tasks affirm that a joint ARD approach consistently yields both sparse and robust prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T13:26:53Z)
• SEMASIA: A Large-Scale Dataset of Semantically Structured Latent Representations [12.185380843937196]
  We introduce SEMASIA, a large-scale collection of latent representations extracted from approximately 1,700 pretrained vision models.<n>We analyze the conceptual organization of individual latent spaces, showing consistent prototype-like clustering.<n>We perform a large-scale regression analysis of how pretraining-data complexity, specialization, transfer learning, augmentation, and model scale relate to geometric and probing properties of embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T11:42:36Z)
• ABLE: Representing and Mapping LLMs via Attribution-Based Large-model Embedding [23.27523995613204]
  We propose ABLE (Attribution-Based Large-model Embedding), a framework that leverages the interpretability space to construct model representations.<n>By aggregating gradient-based feature attributions via a tokenizer-agnostic word-level alignment, ABLE captures model-specific input-sensitivity patterns.<n>Our training-free approach achieves competitive or superior performance in relation prediction, model routing, and benchmark score prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T04:55:11Z)
• Towards Real-world Human Behavior Simulation: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Long-horizon, Cross-scenario, Heterogeneous Behavior Traces [81.41397370235102]
  We introduce OmniBehavior, the first user simulation benchmark constructed entirely from real-world data.<n>We show that current models struggle to accurately simulate complex behaviors, with performance plateauing even as context windows expand.<n>This results in the loss of individual differences and long-tail behaviors, highlighting critical directions for future high-fidelity simulation research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T15:26:21Z)
• Bridging the Semantic Gap for Categorical Data Clustering via Large Language Models [64.58262227709842]
  ARISE (Attention-weighted Representation with Integrated Semantic Embeddings) is presented.<n>It builds semantic-aware representations that complement the metric space of categorical data for accurate clustering.<n>Experiments on eight benchmark datasets demonstrate consistent improvements over seven representative counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-03T11:37:46Z)
• No-rank Tensor Decomposition Using Metric Learning [0.0]
  This paper introduces a no-rank tensor decomposition framework grounded in metric learning.<n>We provide theoretical guarantees for the framework's convergence and establish bounds on its metric properties.<n>Our approach achieves superior performance with smaller training datasets compared to transformer-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T18:21:53Z)
• Stratified GRPO: Handling Structural Heterogeneity in Reinforcement Learning of LLM Search Agents [90.45197506653341]
  Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external tools such as search engines to solve complex, multi-step problems.<n>The trajectories of search agents are structurally heterogeneous, where variations in the number, placement, and outcomes of search calls lead to fundamentally different answer directions and reward distributions.<n>Standard policy gradient methods, which use a single global baseline, suffer from what we identify and formalize as cross-stratum bias.<n>We propose Stratified GRPO, whose central component, Stratified Advantage Normalization (SAN), partitions trajectories into homogeneous strata based on their structural properties and computes advantages locally within each
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T17:59:13Z)
• HEAS: Hierarchical Evolutionary Agent Simulation Framework for Cross-Scale Modeling and Multi-Objective Search [4.807104001943257]
  Hierarchical Simulation Agent (HEAS) is a Python framework that unifies layered agent-based modeling with evolutionary optimization and tournament evaluation.<n>HEAS represents models as hierarchies of lightweight processes ("streams") scheduled in deterministic layers that read and write a shared context.<n> compact API and CLI-simulate, optimize, evaluate-expose single- and multi-objective evolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T13:35:46Z)
• NDCG-Consistent Softmax Approximation with Accelerated Convergence [67.10365329542365]
  We propose novel loss formulations that align directly with ranking metrics.<n>We integrate the proposed RG losses with the highly efficient Alternating Least Squares (ALS) optimization method.<n> Empirical evaluations on real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves comparable or superior ranking performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T06:59:17Z)
• Prismatic Synthesis: Gradient-based Data Diversification Boosts Generalization in LLM Reasoning [77.120955854093]
  We show that data diversity can be a strong predictor of generalization in language models.<n>We introduce G-Vendi, a metric that quantifies diversity via the entropy of model-induced gradients.<n>We present Prismatic Synthesis, a framework for generating diverse synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T16:05:10Z)
• MF-LLM: Simulating Population Decision Dynamics via a Mean-Field Large Language Model Framework [53.82097200295448]
  Mean-Field LLM (MF-LLM) is first to incorporate mean field theory into social simulation.<n>MF-LLM models bidirectional interactions between individuals and the population through an iterative process.<n> IB-Tune is a novel fine-tuning method inspired by the Information Bottleneck principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T12:41:51Z)
• Testing Generalizability in Causal Inference [3.547529079746247]
  No formal procedure exists for statistically evaluating generalizability in machine learning algorithms.<n>We propose a systematic framework for statistically evaluating the generalizability of high-dimensional causal inference models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T11:44:00Z)
• A distribution-free mixed-integer optimization approach to hierarchical modelling of clustered and longitudinal data [0.0]
  We introduce an innovative algorithm that evaluates cluster effects for new data points, thereby increasing the robustness and precision of this model. The inferential and predictive efficacy of this approach is further illustrated through its application in student scoring and protein expression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T23:34:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.