OmniTabBench: Mapping the Empirical Frontiers of GBDTs, Neural Networks, and Foundation Models for Tabular Data at Scale

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06814v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 08:31:43 GMT
• Title: OmniTabBench: Mapping the Empirical Frontiers of GBDTs, Neural Networks, and Foundation Models for Tabular Data at Scale
• Abstract summary: We introduce OmniTabBench, the largest benchmark to date, comprising 3030 datasets spanning diverse tasks.<n>We conduct an unprecedented large-scale empirical evaluation of state-of-the-art models from all model families on OmniTabBench, confirming the absence of a dominant winner.
• Score: 82.32822441887886
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: While traditional tree-based ensemble methods have long dominated tabular tasks, deep neural networks and emerging foundation models have challenged this primacy, yet no consensus exists on a universally superior paradigm. Existing benchmarks typically contain fewer than 100 datasets, raising concerns about evaluation sufficiency and potential selection biases. To address these limitations, we introduce OmniTabBench, the largest tabular benchmark to date, comprising 3030 datasets spanning diverse tasks that are comprehensively collected from diverse sources and categorized by industry using large language models. We conduct an unprecedented large-scale empirical evaluation of state-of-the-art models from all model families on OmniTabBench, confirming the absence of a dominant winner. Furthermore, through a decoupled metafeature analysis, which examines individual properties such as dataset size, feature types, feature and target skewness/kurtosis, we elucidate conditions favoring specific model categories, providing clearer, more actionable guidance than prior compound-metric studies.

Related papers

• Beyond IID: How General Are Tabular Foundation Models, Really? [76.03669797389378]
  Research communities are increasingly evaluating foundation models on diverse datasets and tasks.<n>Standard benchmarks are mostly defined for tasks where tabular foundation models already excel.<n>We introduce BeyondArena, the first unified holistic benchmark for tabular data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-29T14:55:52Z)
• Mitra: Mixed Synthetic Priors for Enhancing Tabular Foundation Models [85.64873567417396]
  We introduce Mitra, a TFM trained on a curated mixture of synthetic priors selected for their diversity, distinctiveness, and performance on real-world data.<n>Mitra consistently outperforms state-of-the-art TFMs, such as TabPFNv2 and TabICL, across both classification and regression benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T07:15:06Z)
• U-Bench: A Comprehensive Understanding of U-Net through 100-Variant Benchmarking [13.41099918346476]
  U-Net has been the dominant architecture in medical image segmentation, leading to the development of thousands of U-shaped variants.<n>Despite its widespread adoption, there is still no comprehensive benchmark to systematically evaluate their performance and utility.<n>We present U-Bench, the first large-scale, statistically rigorous benchmark that evaluates 100 U-Net variants across 28 datasets and 10 imaging modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T14:06:17Z)
• Estimating Time Series Foundation Model Transferability via In-Context Learning [74.65355820906355]
  Time series foundation models (TSFMs) offer strong zero-shot forecasting via large-scale pre-training.<n>Fine-tuning remains critical for boosting performance in domains with limited public data.<n>We introduce TimeTic, a transferability estimation framework that recasts model selection as an in-context-learning problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T07:07:13Z)
• LimiX: Unleashing Structured-Data Modeling Capability for Generalist Intelligence [61.46575527504109]
  LimiX-16M and LimiX-2M treat structured data as a joint distribution over variables and missingness.<n>We evaluate LimiX models across 11 large structured-data benchmarks with broad regimes of sample size, feature dimensionality, class number, categorical-to-numerical feature ratio, missingness, and sample-to-feature ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T17:39:08Z)
• MultiTab: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Multi-Dimensional Evaluation in Tabular Domains [4.126887977388267]
  We propose MultiTab, a benchmark suite and evaluation framework for multi-dimensional, data-aware analysis.<n>Rather than comparing models only in aggregate, MultiTab categorizes 196 publicly available datasets along key data characteristics.<n>Our analysis shows that model performance is highly sensitive to such regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T13:00:43Z)
• Make Still Further Progress: Chain of Thoughts for Tabular Data Leaderboard [27.224577475861214]
  Tabular data, a fundamental data format in machine learning, is predominantly utilized in competitions and real-world applications.<n>We propose an in-context ensemble framework for tabular prediction that leverages large language models.<n>Our method constructs a context around each test instance using its nearest neighbors and the predictions from a pool of external models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T17:52:58Z)
• Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Survey [23.606506938919605]
  Tabular data, structured as rows and columns, is among the most prevalent data types in machine learning classification and regression applications.<n>Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have recently demonstrated promising results through their capability of representation learning.<n>We organize existing methods into three main categories according to their generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T17:58:23Z)
• A Closer Look at Deep Learning Methods on Tabular Datasets [78.61845513154502]
  We present an extensive study on TALENT, a collection of 300+ datasets spanning broad ranges of size.<n>Our evaluation shows that ensembling benefits both tree-based and neural approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T04:24:07Z)
• GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models [56.63218531256961]
  We introduce GenBench, a benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models. GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies. We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T08:01:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.