GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01627v2
• Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:51:22 GMT
• Title: GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models
• Authors: Zicheng Liu, Jiahui Li, Siyuan Li, Zelin Zang, Cheng Tan, Yufei Huang, Yajing Bai, Stan Z. Li,
• Abstract summary: We introduce GenBench, a benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models. GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies. We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance.
• Score: 56.63218531256961
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Genomic Foundation Model (GFM) paradigm is expected to facilitate the extraction of generalizable representations from massive genomic data, thereby enabling their application across a spectrum of downstream applications. Despite advancements, a lack of evaluation framework makes it difficult to ensure equitable assessment due to experimental settings, model intricacy, benchmark datasets, and reproducibility challenges. In the absence of standardization, comparative analyses risk becoming biased and unreliable. To surmount this impasse, we introduce GenBench, a comprehensive benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models. GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies. Through systematic evaluations of datasets spanning diverse biological domains with a particular emphasis on both short-range and long-range genomic tasks, firstly including the three most important DNA tasks covering Coding Region, Non-Coding Region, Genome Structure, etc. Moreover, We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance. Our findings reveal an interesting observation: independent of the number of parameters, the discernible difference in preference between the attention-based and convolution-based models on short- and long-range tasks may provide insights into the future design of GFM.

Related papers

• MITA: Bridging the Gap between Model and Data for Test-time Adaptation [68.62509948690698]
  Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a promising paradigm for enhancing the generalizability of models. We propose Meet-In-The-Middle based MITA, which introduces energy-based optimization to encourage mutual adaptation of the model and data from opposing directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:02:33Z)
• PerturBench: Benchmarking Machine Learning Models for Cellular Perturbation Analysis [14.526536510805755]
  We present a comprehensive framework for predicting the effects of perturbations in single cells, designed to standardize benchmarking in this rapidly evolving field. Our framework, PerturBench, includes a user-friendly platform, diverse datasets, metrics for fair model comparison, and detailed performance analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T07:40:20Z)
• Semantically Rich Local Dataset Generation for Explainable AI in Genomics [0.716879432974126]
  Black box deep learning models trained on genomic sequences excel at predicting the outcomes of different gene regulatory mechanisms. We propose using Genetic Programming to generate datasets by evolving perturbations in sequences that contribute to their semantic diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T10:31:30Z)
• Toward the Identifiability of Comparative Deep Generative Models [7.5479347719819865]
  We propose a theory of identifiability for comparative Deep Generative Models (DGMs) We show that, while these models lack identifiability across a general class of mixing functions, they surprisingly become identifiable when the mixing function is piece-wise affine. We also investigate the impact of model misspecification, and empirically show that previously proposed regularization techniques for fitting comparative DGMs help with identifiability when the number of latent variables is not known in advance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T06:10:54Z)
• Hyperspectral Benchmark: Bridging the Gap between HSI Applications through Comprehensive Dataset and Pretraining [11.935879491267634]
  Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) serves as a non-destructive spatial spectroscopy technique with a multitude of potential applications. A recurring challenge lies in the limited size of the target datasets, impeding exhaustive architecture search. This study introduces an innovative benchmark dataset encompassing three markedly distinct HSI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T08:08:34Z)
• A Systematic Survey in Geometric Deep Learning for Structure-based Drug Design [63.30166298698985]
  Structure-based drug design (SBDD) utilizes the three-dimensional geometry of proteins to identify potential drug candidates. Recent developments in geometric deep learning, focusing on the integration and processing of 3D geometric data, have greatly advanced the field of structure-based drug design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T14:21:58Z)
• GEO-Bench: Toward Foundation Models for Earth Monitoring [139.77907168809085]
  We propose a benchmark comprised of six classification and six segmentation tasks. This benchmark will be a driver of progress across a variety of Earth monitoring tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T16:16:05Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)
• How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Models [95.8037674226622]
  We introduce a 3-dimensional evaluation metric that characterizes the fidelity, diversity and generalization performance of any generative model in a domain-agnostic fashion. Our metric unifies statistical divergence measures with precision-recall analysis, enabling sample- and distribution-level diagnoses of model fidelity and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T18:25:30Z)
• Sparse Semi-supervised Heterogeneous Interbattery Bayesian Analysis [5.653409562189869]
  We propose a general FA framework capable of modelling any problem. The proposed model, Sparse Semi-supervised Heterogeneous Interbattery Bayesian Analysis (SSHIBA) has been tested on 4 different scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T13:00:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.