Event-Centric World Modeling with Memory-Augmented Retrieval for Embodied Decision-Making
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07392v1
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 06:14:46 GMT
- Title: Event-Centric World Modeling with Memory-Augmented Retrieval for Embodied Decision-Making
- Abstract summary: We propose an event-centric world modeling framework with memory-augmented retrieval for embodied decision-making.<n>The framework represents the environment as a structured set of semantic events, which are encoded into a permutation-invariant latent representation.<n>Decision-making is performed via retrieval over a knowledge bank of prior experiences, where each entry associates an event representation with a corresponding maneuver.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Autonomous agents operating in dynamic and safety-critical environments require decision-making frameworks that are both computationally efficient and physically grounded. However, many existing approaches rely on end-to-end learning, which often lacks interpretability and explicit mechanisms for ensuring consistency with physical constraints. In this work, we propose an event-centric world modeling framework with memory-augmented retrieval for embodied decision-making. The framework represents the environment as a structured set of semantic events, which are encoded into a permutation-invariant latent representation. Decision-making is performed via retrieval over a knowledge bank of prior experiences, where each entry associates an event representation with a corresponding maneuver. The final action is computed as a weighted combination of retrieved solutions, providing a transparent link between decision and stored experiences. The proposed design enables structured abstraction of dynamic environments and supports interpretable decision-making through case-based reasoning. In addition, incorporating physics-informed knowledge into the retrieval process encourages the selection of maneuvers that are consistent with observed system dynamics. Experimental evaluation in UAV flight scenarios demonstrates that the framework operates within real-time control constraints while maintaining interpretable and consistent behavior.
Related papers
- SeFaR: Semantic Feature-aware Robustness Testing of Deep Neural Networks [0.6614755043607775]
SeFaR is a framework for semantic-feature-centric testing of vision models.<n>State-of-the-art diffusion and vision-language models are leveraged to generate semantic-preserving perturbations.<n>A feedback-driven adaptive process is adopted to generate interpretable failure-inducing semantic concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-10T22:50:17Z) - Reading Cognition as Decisions Unfold in Words: A Factorized Inverse Decision Model [67.84198127797005]
Inverse decision modeling infers latent properties of decision processes from observed behavior.<n>We propose a factorized inverse decision model (FIDM) that decomposes each individual's task-execution likelihood into an action factor and an effort factor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-10T07:46:13Z) - ConceptTree: Bringing Semantic Transparency to Black-Box Decision Making for Robotic Manipulation [19.876384055954865]
ConceptTree is a framework that reframes high-level manipulation skill selection as reasoning over human-interpretable concepts.<n>We evaluate our approach on a set of real-world robotic manipulation tasks with increasing complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-20T12:02:30Z) - Learning to Watch: Active Video Anomaly Understanding via Interleaved Policy Optimization [56.150184676745205]
Video anomaly understanding (VAU) relies on sparse, context-dependent cues.<n>We propose $Anomtext-$, a closed-loop framework that reconceptualizes video understanding as an active sequential decision-making process.<n>Inspired by human video-reviewing behavior, this framework unifies internal cognitive reasoning and strategic evidence acquisition into an interleaved policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-01T08:41:49Z) - CIRCLE: A Framework for Evaluating AI from a Real-World Lens [10.028017198571833]
CIRCLE aims to bridge the gap between model-centric performance metrics and AI's materialized outcomes in deployment.<n>CIRCLE provides a structured, prospective protocol for linking context-sensitive qualitative insights to scalable quantitative metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T14:43:23Z) - Feature-Based vs. GAN-Based Learning from Demonstrations: When and Why [50.191655141020505]
This survey provides a comparative analysis of feature-based and GAN-based approaches to learning from demonstrations.<n>We argue that the dichotomy between feature-based and GAN-based methods is increasingly nuanced.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-08T11:45:51Z) - Situationally-Aware Dynamics Learning [57.698553219660376]
We propose a novel framework for online learning of hidden state representations.<n>Our approach explicitly models the influence of unobserved parameters on both transition dynamics and reward structures.<n>Experiments in both simulation and real world reveal significant improvements in data efficiency, policy performance, and the emergence of safer, adaptive navigation strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T06:40:11Z) - Demonstrating the Continual Learning Capabilities and Practical Application of Discrete-Time Active Inference [0.0]
Active inference is a mathematical framework for understanding how agents interact with their environments.
In this paper, we present a continual learning framework for agents operating in discrete time environments.
We demonstrate the agent's ability to relearn and refine its models efficiently, making it suitable for complex domains like finance and healthcare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T21:18:46Z) - Cooperative Resilience in Artificial Intelligence Multiagent Systems [2.0608564715600273]
This paper proposes a clear definition of cooperative resilience' and a methodology for its quantitative measurement.
The results highlight the crucial role of resilience metrics in analyzing how the collective system prepares for, resists, recovers from, sustains well-being, and transforms in the face of disruptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-20T03:28:48Z) - HAZARD Challenge: Embodied Decision Making in Dynamically Changing
Environments [93.94020724735199]
HAZARD consists of three unexpected disaster scenarios, including fire, flood, and wind.
This benchmark enables us to evaluate autonomous agents' decision-making capabilities across various pipelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-23T18:59:43Z) - Representation-Centric Survey of Skeletal Action Recognition and the ANUBIS Benchmark [43.00059447663327]
3D skeleton-based human action recognition has emerged as a powerful alternative to traditional RGB and depth-based approaches.<n>Despite remarkable progress, current research remains fragmented across diverse input representations.<n>ANUBIS is a large-scale, challenging skeleton action dataset designed to address critical gaps in existing benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-04T14:03:43Z) - Congestion-aware Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction for Collision
Avoidance [110.63037190641414]
We propose to learn congestion patterns explicitly and devise a novel "Sense--Learn--Reason--Predict" framework.
By decomposing the learning phases into two stages, a "student" can learn contextual cues from a "teacher" while generating collision-free trajectories.
In experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed model is able to generate collision-free trajectory predictions in a synthetic dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-26T02:42:33Z) - Inverse Active Sensing: Modeling and Understanding Timely
Decision-Making [111.07204912245841]
We develop a framework for the general setting of evidence-based decision-making under endogenous, context-dependent time pressure.
We demonstrate how it enables modeling intuitive notions of surprise, suspense, and optimality in decision strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-25T02:30:45Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.