Unified Precision-Guaranteed Stopping Rules for Contextual Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07913v1
• Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 07:30:15 GMT
• Title: Unified Precision-Guaranteed Stopping Rules for Contextual Learning
• Abstract summary: Contextual learning seeks to learn a decision policy that maps an individual's characteristics to an action through data collection.<n>We study this question under two precision criteria: a context-wise criterion and an aggregate policy-value criterion.<n>We develop unified stopping rules for contextual learning with unknown sampling variances in both unstructured and structured linear settings.
• Score: 8.604741134620559
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Contextual learning seeks to learn a decision policy that maps an individual's characteristics to an action through data collection. In operations management, such data may come from various sources, and a central question is when data collection can stop while still guaranteeing that the learned policy is sufficiently accurate. We study this question under two precision criteria: a context-wise criterion and an aggregate policy-value criterion. We develop unified stopping rules for contextual learning with unknown sampling variances in both unstructured and structured linear settings. Our approach is based on generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) statistics for pairwise action comparisons. To calibrate the corresponding sequential boundaries, we derive new time-uniform deviation inequalities that directly control the self-normalized GLR evidence and thus avoid the conservativeness caused by decoupling mean and variance uncertainty. Under the Gaussian sampling model, we establish finite-sample precision guarantees for both criteria. Numerical experiments on synthetic instances and two case studies demonstrate that the proposed stopping rules achieve the target precision with substantially fewer samples than benchmark methods. The proposed framework provides a practical way to determine when enough information has been collected in personalized decision problems. It applies across multiple data-collection environments, including historical datasets, simulation models, and real systems, enabling practitioners to reduce unnecessary sampling while maintaining a desired level of decision quality.

Related papers

• Cost-optimal Sequential Testing via Doubly Robust Q-learning [17.865867651025717]
  We study the problem of learning cost-optimal sequential decision policies from retrospective data.<n>We develop a doubly robust Q-learning framework for estimating optimal policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T08:26:27Z)
• LEC: Linear Expectation Constraints for False-Discovery Control in Selective Prediction and Routing Systems [95.35293543918762]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate unreliable answers, while uncertainty methods fail to fully distinguish correct from incorrect predictions.<n>We address this issue through the lens of false discovery rate (FDR) control, ensuring that among all accepted predictions, the proportion of errors does not exceed a target risk level.<n>We propose LEC, which reinterprets selective prediction as a constrained decision problem by enforcing a Linear Expectation Constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T11:27:09Z)
• Adaptive Off-Policy Inference for M-Estimators Under Model Misspecification [32.7750904494144]
  We propose a method that provides valid inference for M-estimators that use adaptively collected bandit data.<n>A key ingredient in our approach is the use of flexible machine learning approaches to stabilize the variance induced by adaptive data collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T17:51:40Z)
• SConU: Selective Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models [59.25881667640868]
  We propose a novel approach termed Selective Conformal Uncertainty (SConU)<n>We develop two conformal p-values that are instrumental in determining whether a given sample deviates from the uncertainty distribution of the calibration set at a specific manageable risk level.<n>Our approach not only facilitates rigorous management of miscoverage rates across both single-domain and interdisciplinary contexts, but also enhances the efficiency of predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T03:01:45Z)
• Statistical Analysis of Policy Space Compression Problem [54.1754937830779]
  Policy search methods are crucial in reinforcement learning, offering a framework to address continuous state-action and partially observable problems. Reducing the policy space through policy compression emerges as a powerful, reward-free approach to accelerate the learning process. This technique condenses the policy space into a smaller, representative set while maintaining most of the original effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T02:46:55Z)
• Adaptive Conformal Inference by Particle Filtering under Hidden Markov Models [8.505262415500168]
  This paper proposes an adaptive conformal inference framework that leverages a particle filtering approach to address this issue. Rather than directly focusing on the unobservable hidden state, we innovatively use weighted particles as an approximation of the actual posterior distribution of the hidden state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T13:15:32Z)
• Distributional Shift-Aware Off-Policy Interval Estimation: A Unified Error Quantification Framework [8.572441599469597]
  We study high-confidence off-policy evaluation in the context of infinite-horizon Markov decision processes. The objective is to establish a confidence interval (CI) for the target policy value using only offline data pre-collected from unknown behavior policies. We show that our algorithm is sample-efficient, error-robust, and provably convergent even in non-linear function approximation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-23T06:35:44Z)
• Sequential Predictive Two-Sample and Independence Testing [114.4130718687858]
  We study the problems of sequential nonparametric two-sample and independence testing. We build upon the principle of (nonparametric) testing by betting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-29T01:30:33Z)
• Risk Minimization from Adaptively Collected Data: Guarantees for Supervised and Policy Learning [57.88785630755165]
  Empirical risk minimization (ERM) is the workhorse of machine learning, but its model-agnostic guarantees can fail when we use adaptively collected data. We study a generic importance sampling weighted ERM algorithm for using adaptively collected data to minimize the average of a loss function over a hypothesis class. For policy learning, we provide rate-optimal regret guarantees that close an open gap in the existing literature whenever exploration decays to zero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T09:50:13Z)
• Confounding-Robust Policy Evaluation in Infinite-Horizon Reinforcement Learning [70.01650994156797]
  Off- evaluation of sequential decision policies from observational data is necessary in batch reinforcement learning such as education healthcare. We develop an approach that estimates the bounds of a given policy. We prove convergence to the sharp bounds as we collect more confounded data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-11T16:18:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.