Detection of Hate and Threat in Digital Forensics: A Case-Driven Multimodal Approach
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08609v1
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 21:50:02 GMT
- Title: Detection of Hate and Threat in Digital Forensics: A Case-Driven Multimodal Approach
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a case-driven multimodal approach for hate and threat detection in forensic analysis.<n>The proposed framework explicitly determines the presence and source of textual evidence, distinguishing between embedded text, associated contextual text, and image-only evidence.<n>By conditioning inference on evidence availability, the approach mirrors forensic decision-making, improves evidentiary traceability, and avoids unjustified modality assumptions.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: Digital forensic investigations increasingly rely on heterogeneous evidence such as images, scanned documents, and contextual reports. These artifacts may contain explicit or implicit expressions of harm, hate, threat, violence, or intimidation, yet existing automated approaches often assume clean text input or apply vision models without forensic justification. This paper presents a case-driven multimodal approach for hate and threat detection in forensic analysis. The proposed framework explicitly determines the presence and source of textual evidence, distinguishing between embedded text, associated contextual text, and image-only evidence. Based on the identified evidence configuration, the framework selectively applies text analysis, multimodal fusion, or image-only semantic reasoning using vision language models with vision transformer backbones (ViT). By conditioning inference on evidence availability, the approach mirrors forensic decision-making, improves evidentiary traceability, and avoids unjustified modality assumptions. Experimental evaluation on forensic-style image evidence demonstrates consistent and interpretable behavior across heterogeneous evidence scenarios.
Related papers
- InSight: A Benchmark for Agentic Claim Verification in Interactive Visualizations [5.169269482194285]
In this paper, we introduce InSight, a benchmark for agentic claim verification over interactive visualizations.<n>The dataset consists of 21,349 claims derived from human-authored analytical narratives and grounded in fully interactive web-based environments.<n>Unlike traditional evaluations, InSight treats interaction traces as intrinsic proxies for reasoning, enabling a rigorous audit of how models seek and synthesize visual evidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-01T15:15:30Z) - Primitive-Driven Compositional Forensic Visual Prompting for Open-World Face Anti-Spoofing [59.765442274924595]
We propose a compositional visual prompt learning framework that operates entirely in the visual feature space.<n>The framework employs patch-aware attention to refine a shared set of learnable micro-forensic primitives into localized forensic evidence units.<n>Experiments on nine open-world protocols demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, strong cross-domain generalization, and robust adaptation to unseen attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-18T04:18:08Z) - HiEviDR-Bench: A Benchmark for Hierarchical Evidence Aggregation in Deep Research [52.87128503345243]
We introduce HiEviDR-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating Hierarchical Evidence Aggregation in Deep Research.<n>HiEviDR-Bench represents each instance with an explicit evidence graph that captures evidence selection, cross-source linking, and aggregation.<n>We develop a traceability-oriented evaluation framework with five dimensions: report quality, evidence traceability, citation accuracy, claim verification, and answer correctness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-27T23:50:46Z) - ClueAegis: Heuristic-to-Reasoning Cognitive-skill Learning for Unified Evidence-based Synthetic Image Detection [25.871829081625496]
Existing methods are often limited to end-to-end classification or monolithic reasoning.<n>We propose a cognitive skill learning framework for evidence-based forensic analysis.<n>We show that ClueAegis achieves state-of-the-art performance while improving cross-domain and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-24T11:26:15Z) - FRAME: Forensic Routing and Adaptive Multi-path Evidence Fusion for Image Manipulation Detection [3.9783598254756023]
We present textbfFRAME, a method for textbfForensic textbfRouting and textbfAdaptive textbfMulti-path textbfEvidence fusion for image manipulation detection.<n> FRAME organizes diverse forensic algorithms into a multi-path analysis space, adaptively selects informative forensic paths for each input image, and fuses complementary evidence to improve detection and localization performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T23:48:26Z) - DIVER: Dynamic Iterative Visual Evidence Reasoning for Multimodal Fake News Detection [6.225860651499494]
Multimodal fake news detection is crucial for mitigating adversarial misinformation.<n>We propose DIVER (Dynamic Iterative Visual Evidence Reasoning), a framework grounded in a progressive, evidence-driven reasoning paradigm.<n>Experiments on Weibo, Weibo21, and GossipCop demonstrate that DIVER outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by an average of 2.72%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T04:01:33Z) - Analyzing Reasoning Consistency in Large Multimodal Models under Cross-Modal Conflicts [74.47786985522762]
We identify a critical failure mode termed textual inertia, where models tend to blindly adhere to the erroneous text while neglecting conflicting visual evidence.<n>We propose the LogicGraph Perturbation Protocol that structurally injects perturbations into the reasoning chains of diverse LMMs.<n>Results reveal that models successfully self-correct in less than 10% of cases and predominantly succumb to blind textual error propagation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T16:39:34Z) - REVEAL: Reasoning-enhanced Forensic Evidence Analysis for Explainable AI-generated Image Detection [30.963994372913092]
We introduce textbfREVEAL-Bench, the first reasoning-enhanced multimodal benchmark for AI-generated image detection.<n>Our framework integrates detection with a novel expert-grounded reinforcement learning.<n> REVEAL significantly enhances detection accuracy, explanation fidelity, and robust cross-model generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-28T13:11:08Z) - From Evidence to Verdict: An Agent-Based Forensic Framework for AI-Generated Image Detection [19.240335260177382]
We introduce AIFo (Agent-based Image Forensics), a training-free framework that emulates human forensic investigation through multi-agent collaboration.<n>Unlike conventional methods, our framework employs a set of forensic tools, including reverse image search, metadata extraction, pre-trained classifiers, and VLM analysis.<n>Our comprehensive evaluation spans 6,000 images and challenges real-world scenarios, including images from modern generative platforms and diverse online sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-31T18:36:49Z) - Propose and Rectify: A Forensics-Driven MLLM Framework for Image Manipulation Localization [49.71303998618939]
This paper presents a novel Propose-Rectify framework that bridges semantic reasoning with forensic-specific analysis.<n>Our framework ensures that initial semantic proposals are systematically validated and enhanced through concrete technical evidence, resulting in comprehensive detection accuracy and localization precision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-25T12:43:53Z) - A Principled Design of Image Representation: Towards Forensic Tasks [75.40968680537544]
We investigate the forensic-oriented image representation as a distinct problem, from the perspectives of theory, implementation, and application.
At the theoretical level, we propose a new representation framework for forensics, called Dense Invariant Representation (DIR), which is characterized by stable description with mathematical guarantees.
We demonstrate the above arguments on the dense-domain pattern detection and matching experiments, providing comparison results with state-of-the-art descriptors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-02T07:46:52Z) - Open-Domain, Content-based, Multi-modal Fact-checking of Out-of-Context
Images via Online Resources [70.68526820807402]
A real image is re-purposed to support other narratives by misrepresenting its context and/or elements.
Our goal is an inspectable method that automates this time-consuming and reasoning-intensive process by fact-checking the image-context pairing.
Our work offers the first step and benchmark for open-domain, content-based, multi-modal fact-checking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-30T19:36:20Z) - Exploiting Multi-Object Relationships for Detecting Adversarial Attacks
in Complex Scenes [51.65308857232767]
Vision systems that deploy Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples.
Recent research has shown that checking the intrinsic consistencies in the input data is a promising way to detect adversarial attacks.
We develop a novel approach to perform context consistency checks using language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-19T00:52:10Z) - MEG: Multi-Evidence GNN for Multimodal Semantic Forensics [28.12652559292884]
Fake news often involves semantic manipulations across modalities such as image, text, location etc.
Recent research has centered the problem around images, calling it image repurposing.
We introduce a novel graph neural network based model for multimodal semantic forensics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-23T09:01:28Z) - A Survey of Machine Learning Techniques in Adversarial Image Forensics [45.219116050446786]
Image forensic plays a crucial role in both criminal investigations and civil litigation.
Machine learning approaches are also utilized in image forensics.
This paper surveys techniques that can be used to enhance the robustness of machine learning-based binary manipulation detectors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-19T17:16:38Z) - Evidence-Aware Inferential Text Generation with Vector Quantised
Variational AutoEncoder [104.25716317141321]
We propose an approach that automatically finds evidence for an event from a large text corpus, and leverages the evidence to guide the generation of inferential texts.
Our approach provides state-of-the-art performance on both Event2Mind and ATOMIC datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-15T02:59:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.