Noise-Aware In-Context Learning for Hallucination Mitigation in ALLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09021v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 06:35:46 GMT
• Title: Noise-Aware In-Context Learning for Hallucination Mitigation in ALLMs
• Abstract summary: Auditory large language models (ALLMs) have demonstrated strong general capabilities in audio understanding and reasoning tasks.<n>We propose a plug-and-play Noise-Aware In-Context Learning ( NAICL) method to address hallucination issues.
• Score: 5.553031534100783
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Auditory large language models (ALLMs) have demonstrated strong general capabilities in audio understanding and reasoning tasks. However, their reliability is still undermined by hallucination issues. Existing hallucination evaluation methods are formulated as binary classification tasks, which are insufficient to characterize the more complex hallucination patterns that arise in generative tasks. Moreover, current hallucination mitigation strategies rely on fine-tuning, resulting in high computational costs. To address the above limitations, we propose a plug-and-play Noise-Aware In-Context Learning (NAICL) method. Specifically, we construct a noise prior library, retrieve noise examples relevant to the input audio, and incorporate them as contextual priors, thereby guiding the model to reduce speculative associations when acoustic evidence is insufficient and to adopt a more conservative generation strategy. In addition, we establish a hallucination benchmark for audio caption tasks including the construction of the Clotho-1K multi-event benchmark dataset, the definition of four types of auditory hallucinations, and the introduction of metrics such as hallucination type distribution to support fine-grained analysis. Experimental results show that all evaluated ALLMs exhibit same hallucination behaviors. Moreover, the proposed NAICL method reduces the overall hallucination rate from 26.53% to 16.98%.

Related papers

• SHALE: A Scalable Benchmark for Fine-grained Hallucination Evaluation in LVLMs [52.03164192840023]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) still suffer from hallucinations, i.e., generating content inconsistent with input or established world knowledge.<n>We propose an automated data construction pipeline that produces scalable, controllable, and diverse evaluation data.<n>We construct SHALE, a benchmark designed to assess both faithfulness and factuality hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T07:58:01Z)
• Theoretical Foundations and Mitigation of Hallucination in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs) refers to the generation of content that is not faithful to the input or the real-world facts.<n>This paper provides a rigorous treatment of hallucination in LLMs, including formal definitions and theoretical analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-20T15:22:34Z)
• Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Intervention [10.642552315531404]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have revolutionized cross-modal understanding but continue to struggle with hallucinations.<n>We propose SENTINEL, a framework that eliminates dependency on human annotations.<n>Sentence-level Early iNtervention Through IN-domain prEference Learning can reduce hallucinations by over 90% compared to the original model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T17:55:43Z)
• MIRAGE: Assessing Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Chains of MLLM [58.2298313720146]
  Multimodal hallucinations are multi-sourced and arise from diverse causes.<n>Existing benchmarks fail to adequately distinguish between perception-induced hallucinations and reasoning-induced hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T05:54:36Z)
• HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmark [49.170128733508335]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate responses that deviate from user input or training data, a phenomenon known as "hallucination"<n>This paper introduces a comprehensive hallucination benchmark, incorporating both new extrinsic and existing intrinsic evaluation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T13:40:27Z)
• Why and How LLMs Hallucinate: Connecting the Dots with Subsequence Associations [82.42811602081692]
  This paper introduces a subsequence association framework to systematically trace and understand hallucinations.<n>Key insight is hallucinations that arise when dominant hallucinatory associations outweigh faithful ones.<n>We propose a tracing algorithm that identifies causal subsequences by analyzing hallucination probabilities across randomized input contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T06:34:45Z)
• Reefknot: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Relation Hallucination Evaluation, Analysis and Mitigation in Multimodal Large Language Models [13.48296910438554]
  We introduce Reefknot, a comprehensive benchmark targeting relation hallucinations, comprising over 20,000 real-world samples.<n>We provide a systematic definition of relation hallucinations, integrating perceptive and cognitive perspectives, and construct a relation-based corpus using the Visual Genome scene graph dataset.<n>We propose a novel confidence-based mitigation strategy, which reduces the hallucination rate by an average of 9.75% across three datasets, including Reefknot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-18T10:07:02Z)
• ANAH-v2: Scaling Analytical Hallucination Annotation of Large Language Models [65.12177400764506]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit hallucinations in long-form question-answering tasks across various domains and wide applications.<n>Current hallucination detection and mitigation datasets are limited in domains and sizes.<n>This paper introduces an iterative self-training framework that simultaneously and progressively scales up the hallucination annotation dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T17:56:38Z)
• Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinations [67.35512483340837]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been observed to generate responses that include inaccurate or fabricated information. We propose a simple textitInduce-then-Contrast Decoding (ICD) strategy to alleviate hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-25T12:32:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.