Exploring the impact of fairness-aware criteria in AutoML

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10224v1
• Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 14:15:15 GMT
• Title: Exploring the impact of fairness-aware criteria in AutoML
• Abstract summary: We study the impact of integrating fairness directly into the optimisation component of an AutoML framework.<n>Our work incorporates complementary fairness metrics to capture different dimensions of fairness during the optimisation.<n>Despite a 9.4% decrease in predictive power, the average fairness improved by 14.5%, accompanied by a 35.7% reduction in data usage.
• Score: 0.5156484100374058
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) systems are increasingly used to support decision-making processes that affect individuals. However, these systems often rely on biased data, which can lead to unfair outcomes against specific groups. With the growing adoption of Automated Machine Learning (AutoML), the risk of intensifying discriminatory behaviours increases, as most frameworks primarily focus on model selection to maximise predictive performance. Previous research on fairness in AutoML had largely followed this trend, integrating fairness awareness only in the model selection or hyperparameter tuning, while neglecting other critical stages of the ML pipeline. This paper aims to study the impact of integrating fairness directly into the optimisation component of an AutoML framework that constructs complete ML pipelines, from data selection and transformations to model selection and tuning. As selecting appropriate fairness metrics remains a key challenge, our work incorporates complementary fairness metrics to capture different dimensions of fairness during the optimisation. Their integration within AutoML resulted in measurable differences compared to a baseline focused solely on predictive performance. Despite a 9.4% decrease in predictive power, the average fairness improved by 14.5%, accompanied by a 35.7% reduction in data usage. Furthermore, fairness integration produced complete yet simpler final solutions, suggesting that model complexity is not always required to achieve balanced and fair ML solutions.

Related papers

• Automatic Causal Fairness Analysis with LLM-Generated Reporting [39.645183687562806]
  We introduce textscFairMind, a software prototype aiming to automatise fairness analysis at the dataset level.<n>We achieve that by resorting to the assumptions of the emphstandard fairness model, recently proposed by Pleko and Bareinboim.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T10:31:38Z)
• Is Your Model Fairly Certain? Uncertainty-Aware Fairness Evaluation for LLMs [7.197702136906138]
  We propose an uncertainty-aware fairness metric, UCerF, to enable a fine-grained evaluation of model fairness.<n> observing data size, diversity, and clarity issues in current datasets, we introduce a new gender-occupation fairness evaluation dataset.<n>We establish a benchmark, using our metric and dataset, and apply it to evaluate the behavior of ten open-source AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T20:45:18Z)
• Modality-Balancing Preference Optimization of Large Multimodal Models by Adversarial Negative Mining [75.14823970163685]
  We propose a novel preference learning framework, Modality-Balancing Preference Optimization (MBPO), to address the modality imbalance in LMMs.<n>MBPO constructs a more effective offline preference dataset by generating hard negatives, i.e., rejected responses misled by LLM biases.<n>It can enhance LMM performance on challenging vision-language tasks and effectively reduce hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T03:59:05Z)
• Attention Pruning: Automated Fairness Repair of Language Models via Surrogate Simulated Annealing [14.432850893209817]
  This paper introduces Attention Pruning, a fairness-aware simulated annealing approach to prune attention heads in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our experiments show that Attention Pruning achieves up to $40%$ reduction in gender bias and outperforms the state-of-the-art bias mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T03:02:32Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• Emulating Full Participation: An Effective and Fair Client Selection Strategy for Federated Learning [50.060154488277036]
  In federated learning, client selection is a critical problem that significantly impacts both model performance and fairness.<n>We propose two guiding principles that tackle the inherent conflict between the two metrics while reinforcing each other.<n>Our approach adaptively enhances this diversity by selecting clients based on their data distributions, thereby improving both model performance and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T12:27:24Z)
• Learning Fair Ranking Policies via Differentiable Optimization of Ordered Weighted Averages [55.04219793298687]
  This paper shows how efficiently-solvable fair ranking models can be integrated into the training loop of Learning to Rank. In particular, this paper is the first to show how to backpropagate through constrained optimizations of OWA objectives, enabling their use in integrated prediction and decision models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T20:53:53Z)
• Stochastic Methods for AUC Optimization subject to AUC-based Fairness Constraints [51.12047280149546]
  A direct approach for obtaining a fair predictive model is to train the model through optimizing its prediction performance subject to fairness constraints. We formulate the training problem of a fairness-aware machine learning model as an AUC optimization problem subject to a class of AUC-based fairness constraints. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on real-world data under different fairness metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-23T22:29:08Z)
• FORML: Learning to Reweight Data for Fairness [2.105564340986074]
  We introduce Fairness Optimized Reweighting via Meta-Learning (FORML) FORML balances fairness constraints and accuracy by jointly optimizing training sample weights and a neural network's parameters. We show that FORML improves equality of opportunity fairness criteria over existing state-of-the-art reweighting methods by approximately 1% on image classification tasks and by approximately 5% on a face prediction task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T17:36:07Z)
• Robusta: Robust AutoML for Feature Selection via Reinforcement Learning [24.24652530951966]
  We propose the first robust AutoML framework, Robusta--based on reinforcement learning (RL) We show that the framework is able to improve the model robustness by up to 22% while maintaining competitive accuracy on benign samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T03:12:29Z)
• Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
  We consider fairness in the integration component of data management. We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.