Orthogonal machine learning for conditional odds and risk ratios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10412v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 02:14:58 GMT
• Title: Orthogonal machine learning for conditional odds and risk ratios
• Abstract summary: We review existing methods and propose novel ones, focusing on the odds ratio (OR) and the risk ratio (RR)<n>We derive orthogonal risk functions for the OR and RR and show that the associated pseudo-outcomes satisfy second-order conditional-mean remainder properties analogous to the ATE case.<n>We also evaluate estimators for the conditional ATE, OR, and RR in a comprehensive nonparametric Monte Carlo simulation study to compare them with common alternatives under hundreds of different data-generating distributions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Conditional effects are commonly used measures for understanding how treatment effects vary across different groups, and are often used to target treatments/interventions to groups who benefit most. In this work we review existing methods and propose novel ones, focusing on the odds ratio (OR) and the risk ratio (RR). While estimation of the conditional average treatment effect (ATE) has been widely studied, estimators for the OR and RR lag behind, and cutting edge estimators such as those based on doubly robust transformations or orthogonal risk functions have not been generalized to these parameters. We propose such a generalization here, focusing on the DR-learner and the R-learner. We derive orthogonal risk functions for the OR and RR and show that the associated pseudo-outcomes satisfy second-order conditional-mean remainder properties analogous to the ATE case. We also evaluate estimators for the conditional ATE, OR, and RR in a comprehensive nonparametric Monte Carlo simulation study to compare them with common alternatives under hundreds of different data-generating distributions. Our numerical studies provide empirical guidance for choosing an estimator. For instance, they show that while parametric models are useful in very simple settings, the proposed nonparametric estimators significantly reduce bias and mean squared error in the more complex settings expected in the real world. We illustrate the methods in the analysis of physical activity and sleep trouble in U.S. adults using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The results demonstrate that our estimators uncover substantial treatment effect heterogeneity that is obscured by traditional regression approaches and lead to improved treatment decision rules, highlighting the importance of data-adaptive methods for advancing precision health research.

Related papers

• A Guide to Estimating Conditional Average Treatment Effects in Competing Risks Settings [1.7900262205172117]
  Conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) are central to treatment decision-making in personalized medicine.<n>In competing risks settings, estimating CATEs from survival data allows for patient-specific assessments of treatment effectiveness.<n>We study meta-learners which adapt machine learning algorithms for CATE estimation in competing risks scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T15:58:08Z)
• Overlap-weighted orthogonal meta-learner for treatment effect estimation over time [90.46786193198744]
  We introduce a novel overlap-weighted meta-learner for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs)<n>Our WO-learner has the favorable property of Neyman-orthogonality, meaning that it is robust against misspecification in the nuisance functions.<n>We show that our WO-learner is fully model-agnostic and can be applied to any machine learning model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T14:47:57Z)
• Comparison of the Cox proportional hazards model and Random Survival Forest algorithm for predicting patient-specific survival probabilities in clinical trial data [0.0]
  Cox proportional hazards model is often used to analyze data from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) with time-to-event outcomes.<n> Random survival forest (RSF) is a machine-learning algorithm known for its high predictive performance.<n>We compare the performance of Cox regression and RSF in various simulation scenarios based on two reference from RCTs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T12:26:43Z)
• Causal machine learning for heterogeneous treatment effects in the presence of missing outcome data [0.9087641068861047]
  We discuss the impact that missing outcome data has on causal machine learning estimators for the conditional average treatment effect (CATE)<n>We propose two de-biased machine learning estimators for the CATE, the mDR-learner and mEP-learner, which address the issue of under-representation.<n>We show that under reasonable conditions, these estimators are oracle efficient, and illustrate their favorable performance through simulated data settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-27T16:10:03Z)
• Flexible Nonparametric Inference for Causal Effects under the Front-Door Model [2.6900047294457683]
  We develop novel one-step and targeted minimum loss-based estimators for both the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated under front-door assumptions.<n>Our estimators are built on multiple parameterizations of the observed data distribution, including approaches that avoid mediator density entirely.<n>We show how these constraints can be leveraged to improve the efficiency of causal effect estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T22:04:53Z)
• B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under Hidden Confounding [51.74479522965712]
  We propose a meta-learner called the B-Learner, which can efficiently learn sharp bounds on the CATE function under limits on hidden confounding. We prove its estimates are valid, sharp, efficient, and have a quasi-oracle property with respect to the constituent estimators under more general conditions than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T18:07:19Z)
• Generalization bounds and algorithms for estimating conditional average treatment effect of dosage [13.867315751451494]
  We investigate the task of estimating the conditional average causal effect of treatment-dosage pairs from a combination of observational data and assumptions on the causal relationships in the underlying system. This has been a longstanding challenge for fields of study such as epidemiology or economics that require a treatment-dosage pair to make decisions. We show empirically new state-of-the-art performance results across several benchmark datasets for this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-29T15:26:59Z)
• Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects [44.31792000298105]
  We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a class of problems.<n>Our method is model-agnostic in that it can provide the best projection of CDTE onto the regression model class.<n>We investigate the behavior of our proposal in simulations, as well as in a case study of 401(k) eligibility effects on wealth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Increasing the efficiency of randomized trial estimates via linear adjustment for a prognostic score [59.75318183140857]
  Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is central to clinical research. Most methods for historical borrowing achieve reductions in variance by sacrificing strict type-I error rate control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T21:10:10Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)
• Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimators [77.34726150561087]
  Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties. We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE) When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.