Towards an Appropriate Level of Reliance on AI: A Preliminary Reliance-Control Framework for AI in Software Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10530v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 08:47:34 GMT
• Title: Towards an Appropriate Level of Reliance on AI: A Preliminary Reliance-Control Framework for AI in Software Engineering
• Abstract summary: How software developers interact with Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered tools, including Large Language Models (LLMs), plays a vital role in how these AI-powered tools impact them.<n>We propose a preliminary reliance-control framework where the level of control can be used as a way to identify AI overreliance and underreliance.<n>Our findings can help practitioners, educators, and policymakers promote responsible and effective use of AI tools.
• Score: 18.50207872331241
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: How software developers interact with Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered tools, including Large Language Models (LLMs), plays a vital role in how these AI-powered tools impact them. While overreliance on AI may lead to long-term negative consequences (e.g., atrophy of critical thinking skills); underreliance might deprive software developers of potential gains in productivity and quality. Based on twenty-two interviews with software developers on using LLMs for software development, we propose a preliminary reliance-control framework where the level of control can be used as a way to identify AI overreliance and underreliance. We also use it to recommend future research to further explore the different control levels supported by the current and emergent LLM-driven tools. Our paper contributes to the emerging discourse on AI overreliance and provides an understanding of the appropriate degree of reliance as essential to developers making the most of these powerful technologies. Our findings can help practitioners, educators, and policymakers promote responsible and effective use of AI tools.

Related papers

• ''You Can't Open an LLM With a Screwdriver'': The De-Democratization of Software [10.424169529626694]
  Claims that generative AI will soon write all of the code have led to predictions that programming is nearing its end.<n>This vision paper argues that AI does not eliminate software engineering expertise but shifts where that expertise becomes most critical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T15:35:40Z)
• Software Vulnerability Management in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: An Industry Perspective [1.0705399532413618]
  Our study aims to determine the extent of the adoption of AI-powered tools for Software Vulnerability Management.<n>We conducted a survey study involving 60 practitioners from diverse industry sectors across 27 countries.<n>Our findings indicate that AI-powered tools are used throughout the SVM life cycle, with 69% of users reporting satisfaction with their current use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-20T07:58:35Z)
• Rethinking Technology Stack Selection with AI Coding Proficiency [49.617080246389605]
  Large language models (LLMs) are now an integral part of software development.<n>We propose the concept, AI coding proficiency, the degree to which LLMs can utilize a given technology to generate high-quality code snippets.<n>We conduct the first comprehensive empirical study examining AI proficiency across 170 third-party libraries and 61 task scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-14T06:56:47Z)
• The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
  We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z)
• How Developers Interact with AI: A Taxonomy of Human-AI Collaboration in Software Engineering [8.65285948382426]
  We propose a taxonomy of interaction types between developers and AI tools, identifying eleven distinct interaction types.<n>Building on this taxonomy, we outline a research agenda focused on optimizing AI interactions, improving developer control, and addressing trust and usability challenges in AI-assisted development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T12:53:49Z)
• "I Don't Use AI for Everything": Exploring Utility, Attitude, and Responsibility of AI-empowered Tools in Software Development [19.851794567529286]
  This study investigates the adoption, impact, and security considerations of AI-empowered tools in the software development process. Our findings reveal widespread adoption of AI tools across various stages of software development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T09:17:10Z)
• Future of Artificial Intelligence in Agile Software Development [0.0]
  AI can assist software development managers, software testers, and other team members by leveraging LLMs, GenAI models, and AI agents. AI has the potential to increase efficiency and reduce the risks encountered by the project management team.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T16:49:50Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Automated Machine Learning: A Case Study on Non-Intrusive Appliance Load Monitoring [81.06807079998117]
  We propose a novel approach to enable Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) for Non-Intrusive Appliance Load Monitoring (NIALM)<n>NIALM offers a cost-effective alternative to smart meters for measuring the energy consumption of electric devices and appliances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.