''You Can't Open an LLM With a Screwdriver'': The De-Democratization of Software

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24720v1
• Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:35:40 GMT
• Title: ''You Can't Open an LLM With a Screwdriver'': The De-Democratization of Software
• Abstract summary: Claims that generative AI will soon write all of the code have led to predictions that programming is nearing its end.<n>This vision paper argues that AI does not eliminate software engineering expertise but shifts where that expertise becomes most critical.
• Score: 10.424169529626694
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Claims that generative AI will soon write all of the code have led to predictions that programming is nearing its end. In this vision paper, we argue against this assumption that broader access to code generation necessarily democratizes software development, i.e., everyone can code but we have to distinguish between access and control: by access, we mean the ability of more people, including non-experts and less-experienced developers, to generate code-like artifacts with AI; by control, we mean the capacity to inspect, evaluate, integrate, maintain, and govern those artifacts as dependable software. While AI may broaden access to code production, control may become more concentrated among those who own or understand the code, software practices, infrastructure, evaluation practices, and deployment pipelines. Grounded in an expert panel, our vision paper argues that AI does not eliminate software engineering expertise but shifts where that expertise becomes most critical. The locus of software engineering expertise is shifting toward intent specification: orchestrating and governing AI behavior, evaluating software behavior, and integrating software systems. We conclude this paper by identifying research opportunities for education, tools, and policy that can help the software engineering community respond to the AI era with greater agency, accountability, and adaptability.

Related papers

• On Automated and Explainable Provenance of AI-Generated Code [56.818202904805446]
  We argue that the next generation of CodeGenAI tools must be built on a foundation of explainable provenance.<n>We describe a research program combining large-scale empirical studies with post-hoc causal and interpretability techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T14:50:31Z)
• Towards an Appropriate Level of Reliance on AI: A Preliminary Reliance-Control Framework for AI in Software Engineering [18.50207872331241]
  How software developers interact with Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered tools, including Large Language Models (LLMs), plays a vital role in how these AI-powered tools impact them.<n>We propose a preliminary reliance-control framework where the level of control can be used as a way to identify AI overreliance and underreliance.<n>Our findings can help practitioners, educators, and policymakers promote responsible and effective use of AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T08:47:34Z)
• Agentic AI for Software: thoughts from Software Engineering community [9.966138715949205]
  At the code level, common software tasks include code generation, testing, and program repair.<n>Key to successfully developing agentic AI-based software will be to resolve the core difficulty in software engineering - the deciphering and clarification of developer intent.<n>A successful deployment of agentic technology into software engineering would involve making conceptual progress in such intent inference via agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-24T12:57:21Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• Challenges and Paths Towards AI for Software Engineering [55.95365538122656]
  We discuss progress in AI for software engineering in threefold manner.<n>First, we provide a structured taxonomy of concrete tasks in AI for software engineering.<n>Second, we outline several key bottlenecks that limit current approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T17:17:57Z)
• Agentic AI Software Engineers: Programming with Trust [28.18627439288873]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown surprising proficiency in generating code snippets.<n>We argue that successfully deploying AI software engineers requires a level of trust equal to or even greater than the trust established by human-driven software engineering practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T14:28:42Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• "I Don't Use AI for Everything": Exploring Utility, Attitude, and Responsibility of AI-empowered Tools in Software Development [19.851794567529286]
  This study investigates the adoption, impact, and security considerations of AI-empowered tools in the software development process. Our findings reveal widespread adoption of AI tools across various stages of software development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T09:17:10Z)
• Future of Artificial Intelligence in Agile Software Development [0.0]
  AI can assist software development managers, software testers, and other team members by leveraging LLMs, GenAI models, and AI agents. AI has the potential to increase efficiency and reduce the risks encountered by the project management team.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T16:49:50Z)
• Generation Probabilities Are Not Enough: Uncertainty Highlighting in AI Code Completions [54.55334589363247]
  We study whether conveying information about uncertainty enables programmers to more quickly and accurately produce code. We find that highlighting tokens with the highest predicted likelihood of being edited leads to faster task completion and more targeted edits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T18:43:34Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.