BlasBench: An Open Benchmark for Irish Speech Recognition
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10736v2
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:22:01 GMT
- Title: BlasBench: An Open Benchmark for Irish Speech Recognition
- Abstract summary: Existing benchmarks include Irish among dozens of languages but apply no Irish-aware text normalisation.<n>We introduce BlasBench, an open evaluation harness that provides a standalone Irish-aware normaliser preserving fadas, lenition, and eclipsis.<n>We pilot this by benchmarking 12 systems across four architecture families on Common Voice ga-IE and FLEURS ga-IE.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Existing multilingual benchmarks include Irish among dozens of languages but apply no Irish-aware text normalisation, leaving reliable and reproducible ASR comparison impossible. We introduce BlasBench, an open evaluation harness that provides a standalone Irish-aware normaliser preserving fadas, lenition, and eclipsis; a reproducible scoring harness and per-utterance predictions released for all evaluated runs. We pilot this by benchmarking 12 systems across four architecture families on Common Voice ga-IE and FLEURS ga-IE. All Whisper variants exceed 100% WER through insertion-driven hallucination. Microsoft Azure reaches 22.2% WER on Common Voice and 57.5% on FLEURS; the best open model, Omnilingual ASR 7B, reaches 30.65% and 39.09% respectively. Models fine-tuned on Common Voice degrade 33-43 points moving to FLEURS, while massively multilingual models degrade only 7-10 - a generalisation gap that single-dataset evaluation misses.
Related papers
- Benchmarking Speech-to-Speech Translation Models [55.00303727199927]
Speech-to-speech translation (S2ST) has advanced rapidly, but offline evaluation lacks a unified protocol.<n>We introduce a benchmarking framework integrating 46 metrics across eight dimensions.<n>We deploy it on 1,248 model-language configurations from FLEURS and CVSS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T07:01:33Z) - Subtitle-Aligned Fine-Tuning of Whisper for Swiss German ASR: Benchmark Contamination, Convention Mismatch, and an Honest Baseline at 25.6% WER (13.8% cWER) [0.0]
We fine-tune OpenAI's Whisper large-v3 for Swiss German ASR using 1,367 hours of broadcast speech paired with Standard German subtitles as weak supervision.<n>Our best model achieves 25.6% measured WER on the All Swiss German Dialects Test Set (ASGDTS) in an honest evaluation on strictly disjoint data.<n>A vanilla Whisper model self-trained on the ASGDTS test set with zero Swiss German data achieves 13.88% WER, surpassing all published systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-29T13:43:57Z) - PashtoTTS-Bench: automated screening for low-resource non-Latin-script text-to-speech [0.0]
Text-to-speech evaluation for low-resource non-Latin-script languages can fail when it relies on a single ASR round-trip word error rate (WER)<n>We introduce INSV, a reporting framework that separates these cases.<n>We instantiate INSV-A as PashtoTTS-Bench, a dated benchmark for Pashto TTS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T13:03:20Z) - Benchmarking Multilingual Speech Models on Pashto: Zero-Shot ASR, Script Failure, and Cross-Domain Evaluation [0.0]
Pashto is spoken by approximately 60--80 million people but has no published benchmarks for multilingual automatic speech recognition (ASR) on any shared public test set.<n>This paper reports the first reproducible multi-model evaluation on public Pashto data, covering zero-shot ASR, script-level failure, and cross-domain evaluation of fine-tuned models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-06T11:23:42Z) - Polyglot-Lion: Efficient Multilingual ASR for Singapore via Balanced Fine-Tuning of Qwen3-ASR [1.7802147489386628]
We present Polyglot-Lion, a family of compact multilingual automatic speech recognition (ASR) models tailored for the linguistic landscape of Singapore.<n>Our models are obtained by fine-tuning Qwen3-ASR-0.6B and Qwen3-ASR-1.7B exclusively on publicly available speech corpora.<n>On 12 benchmarks spanning the four target languages, Polyglot-Lion-1.7B achieves an average error rate of 14.85, competitive with MERaLiON-2-10B-ASR (14.32)<n>Inference throughput is approximately 20x faster than MERaLiON at 0.10 s/sample
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T07:09:42Z) - Qwen3-ASR Technical Report [71.87071808763484]
We introduce Qwen3-ASR family, which includes two powerful all-in-one speech recognition models and a novel non-autoregressive speech forced alignment model.<n>Qwen3-ASR-1.7B and Qwen3-ASR-0.6B are ASR models that support language identification and ASR for 52 languages and dialects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T06:58:13Z) - VocSim: A Training-free Benchmark for Zero-shot Content Identity in Single-source Audio [1.0791267046450075]
VocSim is a training-free benchmark probing the intrinsic geometric alignment of frozen embeddings.<n>VocSim aggregates 125k single-source clips from 19 corpora spanning human speech, animal vocalizations, and environmental sounds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-10T22:13:12Z) - DialectGen: Benchmarking and Improving Dialect Robustness in Multimodal Generation [111.94720088481614]
Can multimodal generative models effectively produce content given dialectal textual input?<n>We construct a new large-scale benchmark spanning six common English dialects.<n>We design a general encoder-based mitigation strategy for multimodal generative models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T17:56:55Z) - A Multi-Language Object-Oriented Programming Benchmark for Large Language Models [61.267115598083315]
A survey of 35 existing benchmarks uncovers three major imbalances.<n>85.7% focus on a single programming language.<n>94.3% target only function-level or statement-level tasks.<n>Over 80% include fewer than ten test cases on average.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T11:30:08Z) - The ML-SUPERB 2.0 Challenge: Towards Inclusive ASR Benchmarking for All Language Varieties [107.57160730151975]
We construct a new test suite that consists of data from 200+ languages, accents, and dialects to evaluate SOTA multilingual speech models.<n>The best-performing submission achieved an absolute improvement in LID accuracy of 23% and a reduction in CER of 18%.<n>On accented and dialectal data, the best submission obtained 30.2% lower CER and 15.7% higher LID accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T18:42:36Z) - AHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Audio-Language Models [78.20477815156484]
multimodal audio-language models (ALMs) take interleaved audio and text as input and output text.<n>AHELM is a benchmark that aggregates various datasets -- including 2 new synthetic audio-text datasets called PARADE and CoRe-Bench.<n>We also standardize the prompts, inference parameters, and evaluation metrics to ensure equitable comparisons across models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-29T07:40:39Z) - IRLBench: A Multi-modal, Culturally Grounded, Parallel Irish-English Benchmark for Open-Ended LLM Reasoning Evaluation [3.9530780161144667]
We present IRLBench, presented in parallel English and Irish.<n>Our benchmark consists of 12 representative subjects developed from the 2024 Irish Leaving Certificate exams.<n>We show that models produce valid Irish responses less than 80% of the time, and answer correctly 55.8% of the time compared to 76.2% in English for the best-performing model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-16T00:02:05Z) - Who Can Withstand Chat-Audio Attacks? An Evaluation Benchmark for Large Audio-Language Models [60.72029578488467]
Adrial audio attacks pose a significant threat to the growing use of large audio-language models (LALMs) in human-machine interactions.<n>We introduce the Chat-Audio Attacks benchmark including four distinct types of audio attacks.<n>We evaluate six state-of-the-art LALMs with voice interaction capabilities, including Gemini-1.5-Pro, GPT-4o, and others.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-22T10:30:48Z) - MIRAGE-Bench: Automatic Multilingual Benchmark Arena for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [43.19298196163617]
We present a simple efficient technique to combine the best of both worlds.<n>We develop MIRAGE-Bench, a synthetic arena-based RAG benchmark for 18 diverse languages on Wikipedia.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T16:18:49Z) - CLAIR-A: Leveraging Large Language Models to Judge Audio Captions [73.51087998971418]
evaluating machine-generated audio captions is a complex task that requires considering diverse factors.<n>We propose CLAIR-A, a simple and flexible method that leverages the zero-shot capabilities of large language models.<n>In our evaluations, CLAIR-A better predicts human judgements of quality compared to traditional metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T17:59:52Z) - Developing a Multilingual Dataset and Evaluation Metrics for Code-Switching: A Focus on Hong Kong's Polylingual Dynamics [0.5700195008916903]
We develop a 34.8-hour dataset of Mixed Cantonese and English (MCE) audio using our Multi-Agent Data Generation Framework (MADGF)<n>We fine-tuned the open-source multilingual Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) model, Whisper, with the MCE dataset, leading to impressive zero-shot performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T08:01:55Z) - From English to More Languages: Parameter-Efficient Model Reprogramming
for Cross-Lingual Speech Recognition [50.93943755401025]
We propose a new parameter-efficient learning framework based on neural model reprogramming for cross-lingual speech recognition.
We design different auxiliary neural architectures focusing on learnable pre-trained feature enhancement.
Our methods outperform existing ASR tuning architectures and their extension with self-supervised losses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-19T02:37:56Z) - BLASER: A Text-Free Speech-to-Speech Translation Evaluation Metric [66.73705349465207]
End-to-end speech-to-speech translation (S2ST) is generally evaluated with text-based metrics.
We propose a text-free evaluation metric for end-to-end S2ST, named BLASER, to avoid the dependency on ASR systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-16T14:00:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.