How You Ask Matters! Adaptive RAG Robustness to Query Variations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10745v1
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 17:35:58 GMT
- Title: How You Ask Matters! Adaptive RAG Robustness to Query Variations
- Abstract summary: We introduce the first large-scale benchmark of diverse yet semantically identical query variations.<n>We examine its key components across three dimensions: answer quality, computational cost, and retrieval decisions.<n>These findings reveal that Adaptive RAG methods are highly vulnerable to query variations that preserve identical semantics.
- Score: 28.302238047261962
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) promises accuracy and efficiency by dynamically triggering retrieval only when needed and is widely used in practice. However, real-world queries vary in surface form even with the same intent, and their impact on Adaptive RAG remains under-explored. We introduce the first large-scale benchmark of diverse yet semantically identical query variations, combining human-written and model-generated rewrites. Our benchmark facilitates a systematic evaluation of Adaptive RAG robustness by examining its key components across three dimensions: answer quality, computational cost, and retrieval decisions. We discover a critical robustness gap, where small surface-level changes in queries dramatically alter retrieval behavior and accuracy. Although larger models show better performance, robustness does not improve accordingly. These findings reveal that Adaptive RAG methods are highly vulnerable to query variations that preserve identical semantics, exposing a critical robustness challenge.
Related papers
- R$^3$AG: Retriever Routing for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [59.47703698994575]
R$3$AG decomposes retriever capability into two learnable dimensions: retrieval quality and generation utility.<n>R$3$AG consistently outperforms both the best individual retrievers and state-of-the-art static routing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-22T06:51:20Z) - Adaptive Multi-Expert Reasoning via Difficulty-Aware Routing and Uncertainty-Guided Aggregation [0.2864713389096699]
This paper describes Adaptive Multi-Expert Reasoning (AMR), a framework that focuses on problem complexity by reasoning with dynamically adapted strategies.<n>An agile routing system that focuses on problem text predicts problems' difficulty and uncertainty and guides a reconfigurable sampling mechanism to manage the breadth of generation.<n>When evaluated on the GSM8K dataset, AMR achieved 75.28% accuracy while only using the original training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-11T19:44:57Z) - RAGRouter-Bench: A Dataset and Benchmark for Adaptive RAG Routing [37.7721677767453]
We introduce RAG-Bench, the first dataset and benchmark designed for adaptive RAG routing.<n>RAG-Bench revisits retrieval from a query-corpus compatibility perspective and standardizes five representative RAG paradigms for systematic evaluation.<n> Experiments with DeepSeek-V3 and LLaMA-3.1-8B demonstrate that no single RAG paradigm is universally optimal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T20:38:11Z) - Improving Document Retrieval Coherence for Semantically Equivalent Queries [63.97649988164166]
We propose a variation of the Multi-Negative Ranking loss for training DR that improves the coherence of models in retrieving the same documents.<n>The loss penalizes discrepancies between the top-k ranked documents retrieved for diverse but semantic equivalent queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-11T13:34:59Z) - Investigating the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation at the Query Level [4.3028340012580975]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has been proposed as a solution that dynamically incorporates external knowledge during inference.<n>Despite its promise, RAG systems face practical challenges-most notably, a strong dependence on the quality of the input query for accurate retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-09T15:39:17Z) - Attributing Response to Context: A Jensen-Shannon Divergence Driven Mechanistic Study of Context Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [52.3707788779464]
We introduce a novel Jensen-Shannon Divergence driven method to Attribute Response to Context (ARC-JSD)<n>ARC-JSD enables efficient and accurate identification of essential context sentences without additional fine-tuning, gradient-calculation or surrogate modelling.<n> Evaluations on a wide range of RAG benchmarks, such as TyDi QA, Hotpot QA, and Musique, using instruction-tuned LLMs in different scales demonstrate superior accuracy and significant computational efficiency improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T09:04:03Z) - QE-RAG: A Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation Benchmark for Query Entry Errors [23.225358970952197]
Retriever-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted approach for enhancing the factual accuracy of large language models (LLMs)<n>QE-RAG is the first robust RAG benchmark designed specifically to evaluate performance against query entry errors.<n>We propose a contrastive learning-based robust retriever training method and a retrieval-augmented query correction method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-05T05:24:08Z) - HawkBench: Investigating Resilience of RAG Methods on Stratified Information-Seeking Tasks [102.72071523999169]
HawkBench is a human-labeled, multi-domain benchmark designed to rigorously assess RAG performance.<n>By stratifying tasks based on information-seeking behaviors, HawkBench provides a systematic evaluation of how well RAG systems adapt to diverse user needs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-19T06:33:39Z) - Fast or Better? Balancing Accuracy and Cost in Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Flexible User Control [52.405085773954596]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation has emerged as a powerful approach to mitigate large language model hallucinations.<n>Existing RAG frameworks often apply retrieval indiscriminately,leading to inefficiencies-over-retrieving.<n>We introduce a novel user-controllable RAG framework that enables dynamic adjustment of the accuracy-cost trade-off.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T18:56:20Z) - Unanswerability Evaluation for Retrieval Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.<n>We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.