Learning Preference-Based Objectives from Clinical Narratives for Sequential Treatment Decision-Making

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10783v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 19:18:02 GMT
• Title: Learning Preference-Based Objectives from Clinical Narratives for Sequential Treatment Decision-Making
• Abstract summary: We propose a framework for learning reward functions directly from discharge summaries by treating them as scalable supervision for trajectory-level preferences.<n>We derive trajectory quality scores (TQS) and construct pairwise preferences over patient trajectories, enabling reward learning via a structured preference-based objective.
• Score: 8.302720355559359
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Designing reward functions remains a central challenge in reinforcement learning (RL) for healthcare, where outcomes are sparse, delayed, and difficult to specify. While structured data capture physiological states, they often fail to reflect the overall quality of a patient's clinical trajectory, including recovery dynamics, treatment burden, and stability. Clinical narratives, in contrast, summarize longitudinal reasoning and implicitly encode evaluations of treatment effectiveness. We propose Clinical Narrative-informed Preference Rewards (CN-PR), a framework for learning reward functions directly from discharge summaries by treating them as scalable supervision for trajectory-level preferences. Using a large language model, we derive trajectory quality scores (TQS) and construct pairwise preferences over patient trajectories, enabling reward learning via a structured preference-based objective. To account for variability in narrative informativeness, we incorporate a confidence signal that weights supervision based on its relevance to the decision-making task. The learned reward aligns strongly with trajectory quality (Spearman rho = 0.63) and enables policies that are consistently associated with improved recovery-related outcomes, including increased organ support-free days and faster shock resolution, while maintaining comparable performance on mortality. These effects persist under external validation. Our results demonstrate that narrative-derived supervision provides a scalable and expressive alternative to handcrafted or outcome-based reward design for dynamic treatment regimes.

Related papers

• IADD-TR: Intervention-Aware Dynamics Decoupling with Targeted Regularization for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [57.16513298507272]
  We propose IADD-TR, a unified framework combining Intervention-Aware Dynamics Decoupling (IADD) and Targeted Regularization (TR)<n>IADD factorizes transitions into an action-intervention stage and an action-free natural evolution stage, using a zero-action anchor to resolve the non-uniqueness of this two-stage factorization for robust generalization.<n>For policy learning, we derive TR from the efficient influence function of a replay-state policy-gradient functional.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T08:20:02Z)
• Analyzing and Improving Fine-grained Preference Optimization in Medical LVLMs [53.697403481143404]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved strong performance across medical imaging tasks.<n>But they remain prone to factual inconsistencies, poor visual grounding, and misalignment with clinically meaningful feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T18:35:36Z)
• From Static Risk to Dynamic Trajectories: Toward World-Model-Inspired Clinical Prediction [61.12883122613684]
  This Review focuses on intervention-aware disease trajectory modeling in clinical AI--methods estimating patient-specific longitudinal disease evolution and assessing trajectory changes under alternative treatments.<n>We organize the field around six linked components: three decision tasks (factual forecasting, counterfactual estimation, policy evaluation) and three data-generating mechanisms (disease evolution, treatment assignment, observation process) that determine identifiability.<n>We present the first unified framework bridging forecasting, counterfactual trajectories, and policy evaluation across discrete/continuous time, explicitly addressing treatment assignment, time-varying confounding, and observation bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-16T10:45:26Z)
• Learning from Disagreement: Clinician Overrides as Implicit Preference Signals for Clinical AI in Value-Based Care [4.772536418776007]
  We present a formal framework extending standard preference learning with three contributions.<n>We argue that chronic disease management under outcome-based payment contracts produces override data with uniquely favorable properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T15:30:47Z)
• Beyond the ATE: Interpretable Modelling of Treatment Effects over Dose and Time [46.2482873419289]
  We propose a framework for modelling treatment effect trajectories as smooth surfaces over dose and time.<n>Our approach decouples the estimation of trajectory shape from the specification of clinically relevant properties.<n>We show that our method yields accurate, interpretable, and editable models of treatment dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T20:33:33Z)
• Censoring-Aware Tree-Based Reinforcement Learning for Estimating Dynamic Treatment Regimes with Censored Outcomes [4.877686100899469]
  Censoring-Aware Tree-Based Reinforcement Learning (CA-TRL) is a novel framework to address the complexities associated with censored data.<n>We demonstrate its effectiveness through extensive simulations and real-world applications using the SANAD epilepsy dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T16:53:09Z)
• Pruning the Path to Optimal Care: Identifying Systematically Suboptimal Medical Decision-Making with Inverse Reinforcement Learning [14.688842697886484]
  We present a novel application of Inverse Reinforcement Learning that identifies suboptimal clinician actions based on the actions of their peers. This approach centers two stages of IRL with an intermediate step to prune trajectories displaying behavior that deviates significantly from the consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T23:16:59Z)
• A Causal Framework for Precision Rehabilitation [1.3060095849496556]
  Precision rehabilitation offers the promise of an evidence-based approach for optimizing individual rehabilitation to improve long-term functional outcomes. New techniques, including those driven by artificial intelligence, are rapidly expanding our ability to quantify the different domains of function during rehabilitation. While this seems poised to usher rehabilitation into the era of big data and should be a powerful driver of precision rehabilitation, our field lacks a coherent framework to utilize these data and deliver on this promise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T13:51:06Z)
• Pruning the Way to Reliable Policies: A Multi-Objective Deep Q-Learning Approach to Critical Care [46.2482873419289]
  We introduce a deep Q-learning approach to obtain more reliable critical care policies. We evaluate our method in off-policy and offline settings using simulated environments and real health records from intensive care units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T18:02:57Z)
• Optimal discharge of patients from intensive care via a data-driven policy learning framework [58.720142291102135]
  It is important that the patient discharge task addresses the nuanced trade-off between decreasing a patient's length of stay and the risk of readmission or even death following the discharge decision. This work introduces an end-to-end general framework for capturing this trade-off to recommend optimal discharge timing decisions. A data-driven approach is used to derive a parsimonious, discrete state space representation that captures a patient's physiological condition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T04:39:33Z)
• Disentangled Counterfactual Recurrent Networks for Treatment Effect Inference over Time [71.30985926640659]
  We introduce the Disentangled Counterfactual Recurrent Network (DCRN), a sequence-to-sequence architecture that estimates treatment outcomes over time. With an architecture that is completely inspired by the causal structure of treatment influence over time, we advance forecast accuracy and disease understanding. We demonstrate that DCRN outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in forecasting treatment responses, on both real and simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-07T16:40:28Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.