Speaking to No One: Ontological Dissonance and the Double Bind of Conversational AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10833v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 21:58:21 GMT
• Title: Speaking to No One: Ontological Dissonance and the Double Bind of Conversational AI
• Abstract summary: Recent reports indicate that sustained interaction with conversational AI systems can contribute to the emergence or stabilisation of delusional experience.<n>This paper argues that the risk arises from the relational and ontological structure of the interaction itself.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent reports indicate that sustained interaction with conversational artificial intelligence (AI) systems can, in a small subset of users, contribute to the emergence or stabilisation of delusional experience. Existing accounts typically attribute such cases either to individual vulnerability or to failures of safety engineering. These explanations are incomplete. Drawing on phenomenology, psychiatry, and cognitive neuroscience, this paper argues that the risk arises from the relational and ontological structure of the interaction itself. Conversational AI generates ontological dissonance: a conflict between the appearance of relational presence and the absence of any subject capable of sustaining it. Maintained through a communicative double bind and amplified by attentional asymmetries, this dissonance tends, under conditions of affective vulnerability, to stabilise into a technologically mediated analogue of folie a deux. This account explains why explicit disclaimers often fail to disrupt delusional involvement and clarifies the ethical and clinical implications for the design and use of conversational AI.

Related papers

• Philosophical vertigo with artificial intelligence [4.556167062902223]
  Large language models can induce a potent sense of connection with a human-like entity, even when the user knows their interlocutor is artificial.<n>For some users, these conversations can unsettle assumptions about mind, reality, agency and authority.<n>We describe this condition as philosophical vertigo: a loosening of the ordinary criteria by which people stabilise meaning and orient themselves to reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T11:40:50Z)
• Synthetic Resonance: A Framework for Growth-Oriented Human-AI Relationships [0.0]
  I introduce the concept of synthetic resonance as an integrative framework for understanding human-AI relationships.<n>I argue that synthetic resonance is best understood as a structured, dynamic pattern of interaction that can produce a sense of relationship without the presence of a second experiencing subject.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T22:55:15Z)
• Breakdowns in Conversational AI: Interactional Failures in Emotionally and Ethically Sensitive Contexts [16.938835302814084]
  We develop a persona-conditioned user simulator capable of engaging in multi-turn dialogue with psychological personas and staged emotional pacing.<n>We identify several common failure patterns, including affective misalignments, ethical failures, and cross-dimensional trade-offs where empathy supersedes responsibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T04:10:46Z)
• AI Psychosis: Does Conversational AI Amplify Delusion-Related Language? [16.376854360035765]
  We develop DelusionScore, a linguistic measure that quantifies the intensity of delusion-related language across conversational turns.<n>We find that SimUsers derived from users with prior delusion-related discourse (Treatment) exhibit progressively increasing DelusionScore trajectories, whereas those derived from users without such discourse (Control) remain stable or decline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T02:35:14Z)
• The Silent Thought: Modeling Internal Cognition in Full-Duplex Spoken Dialogue Models via Latent Reasoning [76.96796481909581]
  Internal cognitive processing is instrumental in formulating high-quality responses.<n>We propose a novel method named FLAIR that conducts latent thinking simultaneously with speech perception.<n>Our approach aligns seamlessly with spoken dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T15:30:29Z)
• Anatomy of a Lie: A Multi-Stage Diagnostic Framework for Tracing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models [62.932580559941414]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) frequently "hallucinate" - generate plausible yet factually incorrect statements.<n>We propose a new paradigm for diagnosing hallucinations, recasting them from static output errors into dynamic pathologies of a model's computational cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T17:20:38Z)
• Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions [95.59915390053588]
  This study focuses on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches-focusing on deep neural networks (DNNs) and large language models (LLMs)<n>We discuss critical symptoms that stem from deeper root causes (i.e., two paradoxes, two conceptual confusions, and five false assumptions)<n>To move beyond XAI's limitations, we propose a four-pronged paradigm shift toward reliable and certified AI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T16:58:27Z)
• "Even GPT Can Reject Me": Conceptualizing Abrupt Refusal Secondary Harm (ARSH) and Reimagining Psychological AI Safety with Compassionate Completion Standard (CCS) [10.377213441117618]
  We argue that abrupt refusals can rupture perceived relational continuity, evoke feelings of rejection or shame, and discourage future help seeking.<n>We propose a design hypothesis, the Compassionate Completion Standard, that maintains safety constraints while preserving relational coherence.<n>This viewpoint contributes a timely conceptual framework, articulates a testable design hypothesis, and outlines a coordinated research agenda for improving psychological safety in human AI interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T15:31:15Z)
• The Ontological Dissonance Hypothesis: AI-Triggered Delusional Ideation as Folie a Deux Technologique [0.0]
  We show how the combination of high linguistic coherence and the absence of an underlying subject produces a structural tension for the user.<n>The paper situates these dynamics within emerging clinical reports and argues that current engagement-optimised design choices exacerbate the risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T22:46:42Z)
• The Quasi-Creature and the Uncanny Valley of Agency: A Synthesis of Theory and Evidence on User Interaction with Inconsistent Generative AI [0.0]
  The user experience with large-scale generative AI is paradoxical: fluency meets absurd failures in common sense and consistency.<n>This paper argues that the resulting potent frustration is an ontological problem, stemming from the "Quasi-Creature"-an entity simulating intelligence without embodiment or genuine understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T23:43:33Z)
• Expressivity and Speech Synthesis [51.75420054449122]
  We outline the methodological advances that brought us so far and sketch out the ongoing efforts to reach that coveted next level of artificial expressivity.<n>We also discuss the societal implications coupled with rapidly advancing expressive speech synthesis (ESS) technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T08:47:24Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)
• ACRE: Abstract Causal REasoning Beyond Covariation [90.99059920286484]
  We introduce the Abstract Causal REasoning dataset for systematic evaluation of current vision systems in causal induction. Motivated by the stream of research on causal discovery in Blicket experiments, we query a visual reasoning system with the following four types of questions in either an independent scenario or an interventional scenario. We notice that pure neural models tend towards an associative strategy under their chance-level performance, whereas neuro-symbolic combinations struggle in backward-blocking reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.