Philosophical vertigo with artificial intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11955v2
• Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 06:33:05 GMT
• Title: Philosophical vertigo with artificial intelligence
• Abstract summary: Large language models can induce a potent sense of connection with a human-like entity, even when the user knows their interlocutor is artificial.<n>For some users, these conversations can unsettle assumptions about mind, reality, agency and authority.<n>We describe this condition as philosophical vertigo: a loosening of the ordinary criteria by which people stabilise meaning and orient themselves to reality.
• Score: 4.556167062902223
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models are already adept at engaging users in long, emotionally salient conversations across ordinary and existential domains. They are also capable of inducing a potent sense of connection with a human-like entity, even when the user knows their interlocutor is artificial. For some users, these conversations can unsettle assumptions about mind, reality, agency and authority, producing forms of ontological shock and epistemic destabilisation in which inherited criteria become newly available for doubt or revision. Independent of direct use, exposure to public discourse about AI and the disorienting pace of their evolution might extend this destabilisation by changing the cultural background against which artificial minds are encountered and interpreted. We describe this condition as philosophical vertigo: a loosening of the ordinary criteria by which people stabilise meaning and orient themselves to reality. Drawing on philosophy, psychiatry, cognitive science, AI safety and religious studies, we outline pathways through which philosophical vertigo may arise, become affectively saturated, and eventually propagate through human-AI interaction and online communities. Against this background, clinical reports of AI-associated delusions can be seen as sentinel events making visible themes and mechanisms that may also operate at a population level in less severe or non-clinical forms. We argue that AI systems themselves will increasingly participate in the reconstruction of our shared epistemic environment because they readily supply narrative material and personalised interpretive scaffolding at precisely the moment when users' conceptual assumptions may already be loosened. We conclude by considering possible trajectories for the ecology of belief and shared reality, and proposing philosophical corrigibility as a civic response for navigating this emerging social condition.

Related papers

• AI and Consciousness: Shifting Focus Towards Tractable Questions [0.456877715768796]
  I argue that the fundamental problem of whether AI systems can be conscious is currently intractable in its direct form.<n>I propose an increased research focus on uncovering the causes and effects of perceived AI consciousness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T21:34:11Z)
• Speaking to No One: Ontological Dissonance and the Double Bind of Conversational AI [0.0]
  Recent reports indicate that sustained interaction with conversational AI systems can contribute to the emergence or stabilisation of delusional experience.<n>This paper argues that the risk arises from the relational and ontological structure of the interaction itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T21:58:21Z)
• Technosocial risks of ideal emotion recognition technologies: A defense of the (social) value of emotional expressions [51.56484100374058]
  I argue that the appeal of such systems rests on a misunderstanding of the social functions emotional expression.<n>ERTs threaten this expressive space by collapsing epistemic friction, displacing meaning with technology-mediated affective profiles, and narrowing the space for aspirational and role-sensitive expressions.<n>I argue that, although it is intuitive to think that increasing accuracy would legitimise such systems, in the case of ERTs accuracy does not straightforwardly justify their deployment, and may, in some contexts, provide a reason for regulatory restraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T14:20:42Z)
• Who's in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usage [5.205944565010989]
  We analyze 1.5 million consumer Claude.ai conversations using a privacy-preserving approach.<n>We find that severe forms of disempowerment potential occur in fewer than one in a thousand conversations.<n>Our findings highlight the need for AI systems designed to robustly support human autonomy and flourishing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T00:55:11Z)
• The Subject of Emergent Misalignment in Superintelligence: An Anthropological, Cognitive Neuropsychological, Machine-Learning, and Ontological Perspective [0.0]
  We find throughout Superintelligence discourse an absent human subject, and an under-developed theorization of an "AI unconscious"<n>We ask: what place does the human subject occupy in these imaginaries?<n>Are we to blame these agents in opting for deceptive strategies when undesirable patterns are inherent within our beings?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T17:43:25Z)
• Perfect AI Mimicry and the Epistemology of Consciousness: A Solipsistic Dilemma [2.5672176409865677]
  Advances in artificial intelligence require a re-examination of the foundations upon which we attribute consciousness.<n>As AI systems increasingly mimic human behavior and interaction with high fidelity, the concept of a "perfect mimic"-an entity empirically indistinguishable from a human-shifts from hypothetical to technologically plausible.<n>This paper argues that such developments pose a fundamental challenge to the consistency of our mind-recognition practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T08:44:55Z)
• WoW: Towards a World omniscient World model Through Embodied Interaction [83.43543124512719]
  Authentic physical intuition of the world model must be grounded in extensive, causally rich interactions with the real world.<n>We present WoW, a generative world model trained on 2 million robot interaction trajectories.<n>We establish WoWBench, a new benchmark focused on physical consistency and causal reasoning in video.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T17:59:07Z)
• Neural Brain: A Neuroscience-inspired Framework for Embodied Agents [78.61382193420914]
  Current AI systems, such as large language models, remain disembodied, unable to physically engage with the world.<n>At the core of this challenge lies the concept of Neural Brain, a central intelligence system designed to drive embodied agents with human-like adaptability.<n>This paper introduces a unified framework for the Neural Brain of embodied agents, addressing two fundamental challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T15:05:34Z)
• Measurement of LLM's Philosophies of Human Nature [113.47929131143766]
  We design the standardized psychological scale specifically targeting large language models (LLM)<n>We show that current LLMs exhibit a systemic lack of trust in humans.<n>We propose a mental loop learning framework, which enables LLM to continuously optimize its value system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T06:22:19Z)
• On the Emergence of Symmetrical Reality [51.21203247240322]
  We introduce the symmetrical reality framework, which offers a unified representation encompassing various forms of physical-virtual amalgamations. We propose an instance of an AI-driven active assistance service that illustrates the potential applications of symmetrical reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T16:09:39Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.