ARHN: Answer-Centric Relabeling of Hard Negatives with Open-Source LLMs for Dense Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11092v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 07:11:30 GMT
• Title: ARHN: Answer-Centric Relabeling of Hard Negatives with Open-Source LLMs for Dense Retrieval
• Abstract summary: We propose ARHN (Answer-centric Relabeling of Hard Negatives) to refine hard negative samples using answer-centric relevance signals.<n>We evaluate ARHN on the BEIR benchmark under three configurations: relabeling only, filtering only, and their combination.
• Score: 12.84859278829763
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Neural retrievers are often trained on large-scale triplet data comprising a query, a positive passage, and a set of hard negatives. In practice, hard-negative mining can introduce false negatives and other ambiguous negatives, including passages that are relevant or contain partial answers to the query. Such label noise yields inconsistent supervision and can degrade retrieval effectiveness. We propose ARHN (Answer-centric Relabeling of Hard Negatives), a two-stage framework that leverages open-source LLMs to refine hard negative samples using answer-centric relevance signals. In the first stage, for each query-passage pair, ARHN prompts the LLM to generate a passage-grounded answer snippet or to indicate that the passage does not support an answer. In the second stage, ARHN applies an LLM-based listwise ranking over the candidate set to order passages by direct answerability to the query. Passages ranked above the original positive are relabeled to additional positives. Among passages ranked below the positive, ARHN excludes any that contain an answer snippet from the negative set to avoid ambiguous supervision. We evaluated ARHN on the BEIR benchmark under three configurations: relabeling only, filtering only, and their combination. Across datasets, the combined strategy consistently improves over either step in isolation, indicating that jointly relabeling false negatives and filtering ambiguous negatives yields cleaner supervision for training neural retrieval models. By relying strictly on open-source models, ARHN establishes a cost-effective and scalable refinement pipeline suitable for large-scale training.

Related papers

• ARBOR: Online Process Rewards via a Reusable Rubric Buffer for Search Agents [48.80766702702854]
  LLM-based search agents are trained predominantly with outcome-only reward, leaving the search process itself unsupervised.<n>This signal degenerates on outcome-homogeneous groups where all sampled trajectories share the same correctness, yielding zero within-group advantage and no gradient.<n>We propose ARBOR (Adaptive Buffer for Online Reward), a reusable process-reward framework that maintains a rubric memory shared across queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T06:58:54Z)
• When Hard Negatives Hurt: Bridging the Generative-Discriminative Gap in Hard Negative Synthesis for Retrieval [45.5843471557695]
  We show that naively incorporating generated negatives into contrastive learning often degrades retrieval performance.<n>Our analysis reveals two compounding failure modes: discriminative-agnostic generation and source-dependent shortcuts.<n>To close this gap, we propose CausalNeg consisting of two main modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-31T15:48:30Z)
• Improving LLM-based Recommendation with Self-Hard Negatives from Intermediate Layers [80.55429742713623]
  ILRec is a novel preference fine-tuning framework for LLM-based recommender systems.<n>We introduce a lightweight collaborative filtering model to assign token-level rewards for negative signals.<n>Experiments on three datasets demonstrate ILRec's effectiveness in enhancing the performance of LLM-based recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T14:37:43Z)
• Reference-Free Rating of LLM Responses via Latent Information [53.463883683503106]
  We study the common practice of asking a judge model to assign Likert-scale scores to free-text responses.<n>We then propose and evaluate Latent Judges, which derive scalar ratings from internal model signals.<n>Across a broad suite of pairwise and single-rating benchmarks, latent methods match or surpass standard prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T12:15:52Z)
• R3-RAG: Learning Step-by-Step Reasoning and Retrieval for LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [60.17074283370798]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) integrates external knowledge with Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance factual correctness and hallucination.<n>We propose $textbfR3-RAG$, which uses $textbfR$einforcement learning to make the LLM learn how to $textbfR$eason and $textbfR$etrieve step by step, thus retrieving comprehensive external knowledge and leading to correct answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T12:25:37Z)
• Unearthing Gems from Stones: Policy Optimization with Negative Sample Augmentation for LLM Reasoning [41.83677588934301]
  We propose Behavior Constrained Policy Gradient with Negative Sample Augmentation (BCPG-NSA)<n>BCPG-NSA is a fine-grained offline framework that encompasses three stages: 1) sample segmentation, 2) consensus-based step correctness assessment combining LLM and PRM judgers, and 3) policy optimization with NSA designed to effectively mine positive steps within negative samples.<n> Experimental results show that BCPG-NSA outperforms baselines on several challenging math/coding reasoning benchmarks using the same training dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T14:16:49Z)
• REAL: Response Embedding-based Alignment for LLMs [1.9513983244114355]
  We propose a strategy for constructing a high-quality training dataset that focuses on acquiring the less ambiguous preference pairs.<n>Experiments show that choosing dissimilar response pairs enhances the direct alignment of LLMs.<n>Findings suggest that focusing on distinct pairs can reduce the label error and improve LLM alignment efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T22:40:54Z)
• FIRST: Faster Improved Listwise Reranking with Single Token Decoding [56.727761901751194]
  First, we introduce FIRST, a novel listwise LLM reranking approach leveraging the output logits of the first generated identifier to directly obtain a ranked ordering of the candidates. Empirical results demonstrate that FIRST accelerates inference by 50% while maintaining a robust ranking performance with gains across the BEIR benchmark. Our results show that LLM rerankers can provide a stronger distillation signal compared to cross-encoders, yielding substantial improvements in retriever recall after relevance feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T21:27:50Z)
• Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigation [63.180725016463974]
  Cross-modal retrieval relies on well-matched large-scale datasets that are laborious in practice. We introduce a novel noisy correspondence learning framework, namely textbfSelf-textbfReinforcing textbfErrors textbfMitigation (SREM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T09:03:43Z)
• Label Ranking through Nonparametric Regression [5.994412766684843]
  Label Ranking corresponds to the problem of learning a hypothesis that maps features to rankings over a finite set of labels. We introduce a generative model for Label Ranking, in noiseless and noisy nonparametric regression settings. We complement our theoretical contributions with experiments, aiming to understand how the input regression noise affects the observed output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-04T10:59:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.