Taking a Pulse on How Generative AI is Reshaping the Software Engineering Research Landscape

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11184v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:43:56 GMT
• Title: Taking a Pulse on How Generative AI is Reshaping the Software Engineering Research Landscape
• Abstract summary: We conduct a large-scale survey of software engineering (SE) researchers publishing in top venues between 2023 and 2025.<n>We examine who uses Generative AI (GenAI) and why, where it is used across research activities, and how researchers perceive its benefits, opportunities, challenges, risks, and governance.
• Score: 10.576800319451133
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Context: Software engineering (SE) researchers increasingly study Generative AI (GenAI) while also incorporating it into their own research practices. Despite rapid adoption, there is limited empirical evidence on how GenAI is used in SE research and its implications for research practices and governance. Aims: We conduct a large-scale survey of 457 SE researchers publishing in top venues between 2023 and 2025. Method: Using quantitative and qualitative analyses, we examine who uses GenAI and why, where it is used across research activities, and how researchers perceive its benefits, opportunities, challenges, risks, and governance. Results: GenAI use is widespread, with many researchers reporting pressure to adopt and align their work with it. Usage is concentrated in writing and early-stage activities, while methodological and analytical tasks remain largely human-driven. Although productivity gains are widely perceived, concerns about trust, correctness, and regulatory uncertainty persist. Researchers highlight risks such as inaccuracies and bias, emphasize mitigation through human oversight and verification, and call for clearer governance, including guidance on responsible use and peer review. Conclusion: We provide a fine-grained, SE-specific characterization of GenAI use across research activities, along with taxonomies of GenAI use cases for research and peer review, opportunities, risks, mitigation strategies, and governance needs. These findings establish an empirical baseline for the responsible integration of GenAI into academic practice.

Related papers

• Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scales [118.2204632627895]
  SciAgentArena is a systematic benchmark for evaluating AI agents in real-world scientific research scenarios.<n>It comprises approximately 200 tasks with stepwise verification and an interactive, agent-agnostic environment for assessing diverse AI agents.<n>We find that current agents can contribute effectively to well-specified data-analysis, particularly when the task structure and evaluation criteria are clear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T22:55:30Z)
• GenAI Is No Silver Bullet for Qualitative Research in Software Engineering [12.444212651043593]
  We discuss the emerging use of generative AI (GenAI) in relation to the broad spectrum of qualitative research in software engineering.<n>Our goal is to inform researchers about the promises and pitfalls of GenAI-assisted qualitative research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T21:35:36Z)
• The Story is Not the Science: Execution-Grounded Evaluation of Mechanistic Interpretability Research [56.80927148740585]
  We address the challenges of scalability and rigor by flipping the dynamic and developing AI agents as research evaluators.<n>We use mechanistic interpretability research as a testbed, build standardized research output, and develop MechEvalAgent.<n>Our work demonstrates the potential of AI agents to transform research evaluation and pave the way for rigorous scientific practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T19:00:02Z)
• AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suite [75.58737079136942]
  We present AstaBench, a suite that provides the first holistic measure of agentic ability to perform scientific research.<n>Our suite comes with the first scientific research environment with production-grade search tools.<n>Our evaluation of 57 agents across 22 agent classes reveals several interesting findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T17:10:26Z)
• AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [55.5452803680643]
  We present a comprehensive survey on AI for Research (AI4Research)<n>We first introduce a systematic taxonomy to classify five mainstream tasks in AI4Research.<n>We identify key research gaps and highlight promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T17:19:20Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
  A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.<n>Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z)
• Research Integrity and GenAI: A Systematic Analysis of Ethical Challenges Across Research Phases [0.0]
  The rapid development and use of generative AI (GenAI) tools in academia presents complex and multifaceted ethical challenges for its users.<n>This study aims to examine the ethical concerns arising from the use of GenAI across different phases of research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T13:31:45Z)
• Navigating Ethical Challenges in Generative AI-Enhanced Research: The ETHICAL Framework for Responsible Generative AI Use [0.0]
  The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in research presents both opportunities and ethical challenges.<n>This paper develops the ETHICAL framework, which is a practical guide for responsible GenAI use in research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T05:49:11Z)
• "So what if I used GenAI?" -- Implications of Using Cloud-based GenAI in Software Engineering Research [0.0]
  This paper sheds light on the various research aspects in which GenAI is used, thus raising awareness of its legal implications to novice and budding researchers.<n>We summarize key aspects regarding our current knowledge that every software researcher involved in using GenAI should be aware of to avoid critical mistakes that may expose them to liability claims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T06:18:15Z)
• Generative AI Tools in Academic Research: Applications and Implications for Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologies [0.0]
  This study examines the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on academic research, focusing on its application to qualitative and quantitative data analysis. GenAI tools evolve rapidly, they offer new possibilities for enhancing research productivity and democratising complex analytical processes. Their integration into academic practice raises significant questions regarding research integrity and security, authorship, and the changing nature of scholarly work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T13:10:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.