Sign Language Recognition in the Age of LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11225v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:26:16 GMT
• Title: Sign Language Recognition in the Age of LLMs
• Abstract summary: Recent Vision Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of multimodal reasoning tasks.<n>We investigate the capability of modern VLMs to perform isolated sign language recognition in a zero-shot setting.
• Score: 0.2609784101826761
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent Vision Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of multimodal reasoning tasks. This raises the question of whether such general-purpose models can also address specialized visual recognition problems such as isolated sign language recognition (ISLR) without task-specific training. In this work, we investigate the capability of modern VLMs to perform ISLR in a zero-shot setting. We evaluate several open-source and proprietary VLMs on the WLASL300 benchmark. Our experiments show that, under prompt-only zero-shot inference, current open-source VLMs remain far behind classic supervised ISLR classifiers by a wide margin. However, follow-up experiments reveal that these models capture partial visual-semantic alignment between signs and text descriptions. Larger proprietary models achieve substantially higher accuracy, highlighting the importance of model scale and training data diversity. All our code is publicly available on GitHub.

Related papers

• Rethinking Model Selection in VLM Through the Lens of Gromov-Wasserstein Distance [65.36257254806647]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have enhanced traditional LLMs with visual capabilities through the integration of vision encoders.<n>We show that common practices, such as choosing encoders with the largest size or highest zero-shot accuracy, consistently fail to identify optimal models.<n>This intriguing finding begs a fundamental question: What factors of vision-encoders matter in VLM?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T08:42:13Z)
• Understanding the Fine-Grained Knowledge Capabilities of Vision-Language Models [42.79282247484499]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have made substantial progress across a wide range of visual question answering benchmarks, spanning visual reasoning, document understanding, and multimodal dialogue.<n>Recent works show that these models trail behind in traditional image classification benchmarks, which test fine-grained visual knowledge.<n>We test a large number of recent VLMs on fine-grained classification benchmarks and identify potential factors in the disconnect between fine-grained knowledge and other vision benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T22:07:29Z)
• Seeing Beyond Words: Self-Supervised Visual Learning for Multimodal Large Language Models [53.06230963851451]
  JARVIS is a JEPA-inspired framework for self-supervised visual enhancement in MLLMs.<n>We introduce JARVIS, a JEPA-inspired framework for self-supervised visual enhancement in MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T19:01:34Z)
• Response Wide Shut? Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities [54.94982467313341]
  Vision-language Models (VLMs) have emerged as general-purpose tools for addressing a variety of complex computer vision problems.<n>We set out to understand the limitations of SoTA VLMs on fundamental visual tasks by constructing a series of tests that probe which components of design, specifically, may be lacking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T15:26:41Z)
• GenRecal: Generation after Recalibration from Large to Small Vision-Language Models [63.27511432647797]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have leveraged large language models (LLMs) to achieve performance on par with closed-source systems like GPT-4V.<n>Recent advancements in vision-language models (VLMs) have leveraged large language models (LLMs) to achieve performance on par with closed-source systems like GPT-4V.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T17:59:49Z)
• Hidden in plain sight: VLMs overlook their visual representations [48.83628674170634]
  We compare vision language models (VLMs) to their visual encoders to understand their ability to integrate across these modalities.<n>We find that VLMs perform substantially worse than their visual encoders, dropping to near-chance performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T17:59:54Z)
• Mimicking or Reasoning: Rethinking Multi-Modal In-Context Learning in Vision-Language Models [19.361686225381447]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) are widely assumed to exhibit in-context learning (ICL)<n>We propose a new MM-ICL with Reasoning pipeline that augments each demonstration with a generated rationale alongside the answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T16:55:32Z)
• EZ-HOI: VLM Adaptation via Guided Prompt Learning for Zero-Shot HOI Detection [21.091101582856183]
  We introduce a novel prompt learning-based framework for Efficient Zero-Shot HOI detection (EZ-HOI).<n>First, we introduce Large Language Model (LLM) and VLM guidance for learnable prompts, integrating detailed HOI descriptions and visual semantics to adapt VLMs to HOI tasks.<n>We show that our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance across various zero-shot settings with only 10.35% to 33.95% of the trainable parameters compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T13:06:29Z)
• Response Wide Shut: Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities [30.176918208200604]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have emerged as general purpose tools for addressing a variety of complex computer vision problems. These models have been shown to be highly capable, but also lacking some basic visual understanding skills. This paper sets out to understand the limitations of SoTA VLMs on fundamental visual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T08:26:32Z)
• Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs [61.143381152739046]
  We introduce Cambrian-1, a family of multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) designed with a vision-centric approach.<n>Our study uses LLMs and visual instruction tuning as an interface to evaluate various visual representations.<n>We provide model weights, code, supporting tools, datasets, and detailed instruction-tuning and evaluation recipes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:59:42Z)
• Dense Connector for MLLMs [89.50595155217108]
  We introduce the Dense Connector - a plug-and-play vision-language connector that significantly enhances existing MLLMs. Building on this, we also propose the Efficient Dense Connector, which achieves performance comparable to LLaVA-v1.5 with only 25% of the visual tokens. Our model, trained solely on images, showcases remarkable zero-shot capabilities in video understanding as well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T16:25:03Z)
• Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models [50.653838482083614]
  This paper introduces a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks.<n> MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal "hallucination" events in IT-LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T16:39:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.