SLALOM: Simulation Lifecycle Analysis via Longitudinal Observation Metrics for Social Simulation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11466v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 13:40:50 GMT
• Title: SLALOM: Simulation Lifecycle Analysis via Longitudinal Observation Metrics for Social Simulation
• Abstract summary: Large Language Model (LLM) agents offer a potentially-transformative path forward for generative social science.<n>Current simulation evaluation methodologies suffer from the "stopped clock" problem.<n>We introduce SLALOM, a framework that shifts validation from outcome verification to process fidelity.
• Score: 6.47425225935854
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents offer a potentially-transformative path forward for generative social science but face a critical crisis of validity. Current simulation evaluation methodologies suffer from the "stopped clock" problem: they confirm that a simulation reached the correct final outcome while ignoring whether the trajectory leading to it was sociologically plausible. Because the internal reasoning of LLMs is opaque, verifying the "black box" of social mechanisms remains a persistent challenge. In this paper, we introduce SLALOM (Simulation Lifecycle Analysis via Longitudinal Observation Metrics), a framework that shifts validation from outcome verification to process fidelity. Drawing on Pattern-Oriented Modeling (POM), SLALOM treats social phenomena as multivariate time series that must traverse specific SLALOM gates, or intermediate waypoint constraints representing distinct phases. By utilizing Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) to align simulated trajectories with empirical ground truth, SLALOM offers a quantitative metric to assess structural realism, helping to differentiate plausible social dynamics from stochastic noise and contributing to more robust policy simulation standards.

Related papers

• Long-term Traffic Simulation via Structured Autoregressive Modeling [2.8456699777487215]
  We introduce RosettaSim, a unified framework that projects scene topology, agent states, and spawning intents into a structured autoregressive stream with variable length.<n>We also introduce Retrieval-based Traffic Evaluation (RTE), which retrieves semantically similar real-world scenarios as context-aware reference anchors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T06:41:28Z)
• Simulate, Reason, Decide: Scientific Reasoning with LLMs for Simulation-Driven Decision Making [50.05403024674141]
  MechSim is a mechanism-grounded neuro-symbolic reasoning framework for executable scientific simulators.<n>Our framework represents simulators through a shared structured schema capturing assumptions, variables, mechanism dependencies, and execution traces.<n>We evaluate our approach across multiple high-stakes domains and show that it improves mechanism-level explanation quality, simulator analysis, and downstream decision-making reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T06:36:51Z)
• Towards Real-world Human Behavior Simulation: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Long-horizon, Cross-scenario, Heterogeneous Behavior Traces [81.41397370235102]
  We introduce OmniBehavior, the first user simulation benchmark constructed entirely from real-world data.<n>We show that current models struggle to accurately simulate complex behaviors, with performance plateauing even as context windows expand.<n>This results in the loss of individual differences and long-tail behaviors, highlighting critical directions for future high-fidelity simulation research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T15:26:21Z)
• Beyond Scalars: Evaluating and Understanding LLM Reasoning via Geometric Progress and Stability [32.78289130870447]
  TRACED is a framework that assesses reasoning quality through theoretically grounded geometric kinematics.<n>We reveal a distinct topological divergence: correct reasoning manifests as high-progress, stable trajectories, whereas hallucinations are characterized by low-progress, unstable patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T03:58:43Z)
• Sim2Act: Robust Simulation-to-Decision Learning via Adversarial Calibration and Group-Relative Perturbation [54.29523408543184]
  Simulation-to-decision learning enables safe policy training in digital environments without risking real-world deployment.<n>Existing approaches either focus on improving average simulation fidelity or adopt conservative regularization.<n>We propose Sim2Act, a robust simulation-to-decision framework that addresses both simulator and policy robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-10T00:51:47Z)
• SimBench: Benchmarking the Ability of Large Language Models to Simulate Human Behaviors [58.87134689752605]
  We introduce SimBench, the first large-scale, standardized benchmark for a robust, reproducible science of LLM simulation.<n>We show that even the best LLMs today have limited simulation ability (score: 40.80/100), performance scales log-linearly with model size.<n>We demonstrate that simulation ability correlates most strongly with deep, knowledge-intensive reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T13:14:38Z)
• Drift No More? Context Equilibria in Multi-Turn LLM Interactions [58.69551510148673]
  contexts drift is the gradual divergence of a model's outputs from goal-consistent behavior across turns.<n>Unlike single-turn errors, drift unfolds temporally and is poorly captured by static evaluation metrics.<n>We show that multi-turn drift can be understood as a controllable equilibrium phenomenon rather than as inevitable decay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T04:48:49Z)
• LLM-Based Social Simulations Require a Boundary [3.351170542925928]
  This position paper argues that large language model (LLM)-based social simulations should establish clear boundaries.<n>We examine three key boundary problems: alignment (simulated behaviors matching real-world patterns), consistency (maintaining coherent agent behavior over time), and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T17:14:47Z)
• Sense and Sensitivity: Evaluating the simulation of social dynamics via Large Language Models [27.313165173789233]
  Large language models have been proposed as a powerful replacement for classical agent-based models (ABMs) to simulate social dynamics.<n>However, due to the black box nature of LLMs, it is unclear whether LLM agents actually execute the intended semantics.<n>We show that while it is possible to engineer prompts that approximate the intended dynamics, the quality of these simulations is highly sensitive to the particular choice of prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T14:50:01Z)
• Analyzing and Enhancing Closed-loop Stability in Reactive Simulation [25.27603440925488]
  We propose a new reactive simulation framework to bridge the human behavior gap between simulation and real-world traffic scenarios. We first propose a new reactive simulation framework, where the smoothness and consistency of the simulated state sequences are crucial factors to stability. We then incorporate the kinematic vehicle model into the framework to improve the closed-loop stability of the reactive simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-09T06:31:35Z)
• Likelihood-Free Inference in State-Space Models with Unknown Dynamics [71.94716503075645]
  We introduce a method for inferring and predicting latent states in state-space models where observations can only be simulated, and transition dynamics are unknown. We propose a way of doing likelihood-free inference (LFI) of states and state prediction with a limited number of simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T12:33:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.