The Non-Optimality of Scientific Knowledge: Path Dependence, Lock-In, and The Local Minimum Trap

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11828v2
• Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:37:58 GMT
• Title: The Non-Optimality of Scientific Knowledge: Path Dependence, Lock-In, and The Local Minimum Trap
• Abstract summary: We argue that science follows the steepest local gradient of tractability, empirical accessibility, and institutional reward.<n>We identify three interlocking mechanisms of lock-in-cognitive, formal, and institutional--and argue that recognizing these mechanisms is a prerequisite for designing meta-scientific strategies capable of escaping local optima.
• Score: 0.2538209532048867
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Science is widely regarded as humanity's most reliable method for uncovering truths about the natural world. Yet the \emph{trajectory} of scientific discovery is rarely examined as an optimization problem in its own right. This paper argues that the body of scientific knowledge, at any given historical moment, represents a \emph{local optimum} rather than a global one--that the frameworks, formalisms, and paradigms through which we understand nature are substantially shaped by historical contingency, cognitive path dependence, and institutional lock-in. Drawing an analogy to gradient descent in machine learning, we propose that science follows the steepest local gradient of tractability, empirical accessibility, and institutional reward, and in doing so may bypass fundamentally superior descriptions of nature. We develop this thesis through detailed case studies spanning mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, neuroscience, and statistical methodology. We identify three interlocking mechanisms of lock-in--cognitive, formal, and institutional--and argue that recognizing these mechanisms is a prerequisite for designing meta-scientific strategies capable of escaping local optima. We conclude by proposing concrete interventions and discussing the epistemological implications of our thesis for the philosophy of science.

Related papers

• ECLAIR: A Causally-Grounded AI Framework for Scientific Discovery in Empirical Software Engineering [51.19819833971252]
  This paper introduces ECLAIR, a causally grounded AI framework that integrates Large Language Models into every stage of the scientific process.<n>ECLAIR treats LLMs as active scientific agents operating under the principles of causal inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T14:47:03Z)
• From Observation to Insight: Mechanistic World Models and the Quest for Autonomous Discovery [60.11725132433485]
  We argue that scientific discovery is fundamentally a problem of knowledge organisation.<n>We introduce Mechanistic World Models, a new design paradigm that places reusable mechanisms at the centre of representation, computation and learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T08:03:27Z)
• Accurate, Interdisciplinary and Transparent Structure-property Understanding with Deep Native Structural Reasoning [103.788281428856]
  We introduce SciReasoner, a scientific foundation model for native structural reasoning across proteins, small molecules and inorganic crystals.<n>SciReasoner discretizes coordinates, topologies and periodic connectivities into a unified structure-aware vocabulary.<n>Across 86 benchmarks, SciReasoner achieves state-of-the-art performance on 67 tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T17:59:59Z)
• There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learning [62.690977616250954]
  We make the case that a scientific theory of deep learning is emerging.<n>We identify five growing bodies of work that point toward such a theory.<n>We argue that the emerging theory is best thought of as a mechanics of the learning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T13:58:12Z)
• Embodied Science: Closing the Discovery Loop with Agentic Embodied AI [73.54118756665221]
  We argue for embodied science, a paradigm that reframes scientific discovery as a closed loop tightly coupling agentic reasoning with physical execution.<n>We propose a unified Perception-Language-Action-Discovery (PLAD) framework, wherein embodied agents perceive experimental environments, reason over scientific knowledge, execute physical interventions, and internalize outcomes to drive subsequent exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T09:20:12Z)
• SciIF: Benchmarking Scientific Instruction Following Towards Rigorous Scientific Intelligence [60.202862987441684]
  We introduce scientific instruction following: the capability to solve problems while strictly adhering to the constraints that establish scientific validity.<n>Specifically, we introduce SciIF, a multi-discipline benchmark that evaluates this capability by pairing university-level problems with a fixed catalog of constraints.<n>By measuring both solution correctness and multi-constraint adherence, SciIF enables finegrained diagnosis of compositional reasoning failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T09:45:58Z)
• Realism and Ontology in Quantum Mechanics and String Theory [0.0]
  Dualities in physics have challenged traditional forms of scientific realism.<n>We argue that ontological commitment should be treated as tied to specific empirical contexts.<n>We show how our view accommodates ontological pluralism while preserving a robust form of structural realism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T23:31:13Z)
• Autonomous Agents for Scientific Discovery: Orchestrating Scientists, Language, Code, and Physics [82.55776608452017]
  Large language models (LLMs) provide a flexible and versatile framework that orchestrates interactions with human scientists, natural language, computer language and code, and physics.<n>This paper presents our view and vision of LLM-based scientific agents and their growing role in transforming the scientific discovery lifecycle.<n>We identify open research challenges and outline promising directions for building more robust, generalizable, and adaptive scientific agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T22:26:26Z)
• Newton to Einstein: Axiom-Based Discovery via Game Design [55.30047000068118]
  We propose a game design framework in which scientific inquiry is recast as a rule-evolving system.<n>Unlike conventional ML approaches that operate within fixed assumptions, our method enables the discovery of new theoretical structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T18:59:18Z)
• Demystifying Scientific Problem-Solving in LLMs by Probing Knowledge and Reasoning [53.82037883518254]
  We introduce SciReas, a diverse suite of existing benchmarks for scientific reasoning tasks.<n>We then propose KRUX, a probing framework for studying the distinct roles of reasoning and knowledge in scientific tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T17:04:23Z)
• Active Inference AI Systems for Scientific Discovery [1.450405446885067]
  This perspective contends that progress turns on closing three mutually reinforcing gaps in abstraction, reasoning and empirical grounding.<n>Design principles are proposed for systems that reason in imaginary spaces and learn from the world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T14:43:04Z)
• "Cause" is Mechanistic Narrative within Scientific Domains: An Ordinary Language Philosophical Critique of "Causal Machine Learning" [2.5782973781085383]
  Causal Learning has emerged as a major theme of research in statistics and machine learning.<n>In this paper we consider recognizing true cause and effect phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T10:36:26Z)
• LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discovery [141.39722070734737]
  We propose to enhance the knowledge-driven, abstract reasoning abilities of Large Language Models with the computational strength of simulations. We introduce Scientific Generative Agent (SGA), a bilevel optimization framework. We conduct experiments to demonstrate our framework's efficacy in law discovery and molecular design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T03:04:10Z)
• Algorithmic Bayesian Epistemology [2.44755919161855]
  One aspect of the algorithmic lens in computer science is a view on other scientific disciplines that adhere to real-world constraints. This thesis applies the algorithmic lens to the fields of molecular biology, ecology, neuroscience, and quantum physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T23:03:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.