Self-Distillation Zero: Self-Revision Turns Binary Rewards into Dense Supervision
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12002v1
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 19:46:55 GMT
- Title: Self-Distillation Zero: Self-Revision Turns Binary Rewards into Dense Supervision
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning (RLVR) relies on binary rewards, which are broadly applicable and powerful, but provide only sparse supervision during training.<n>Distillation provides dense token-level supervision, typically obtained from an external teacher or using high-quality demonstrations.<n>We propose Self-Distillation Zero (SD-Zero), a method that is substantially more training sample-efficient than RL and does not require an external teacher or high-quality demonstrations.
- Score: 50.61441331643804
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Current post-training methods in verifiable settings fall into two categories. Reinforcement learning (RLVR) relies on binary rewards, which are broadly applicable and powerful, but provide only sparse supervision during training. Distillation provides dense token-level supervision, typically obtained from an external teacher or using high-quality demonstrations. Collecting such supervision can be costly or unavailable. We propose Self-Distillation Zero (SD-Zero), a method that is substantially more training sample-efficient than RL and does not require an external teacher or high-quality demonstrations. SD-Zero trains a single model to play two roles: a Generator, which produces an initial response, and a Reviser, which conditions on that response and its binary reward to produce an improved response. We then perform on-policy self-distillation to distill the reviser into the generator, using the reviser's token distributions conditioned on the generator's response and its reward as supervision. In effect, SD-Zero trains the model to transform binary rewards into dense token-level self-supervision. On math and code reasoning benchmarks with Qwen3-4B-Instruct and Olmo-3-7B-Instruct, SD-Zero improves performance by at least 10% over the base models and outperforms strong baselines, including Rejection Fine-Tuning (RFT), GRPO, and Self-Distillation Fine-Tuning (SDFT), under the same question set and training sample budget. Extensive ablation studies show two novel characteristics of our proposed algorithm: (a) token-level self-localization, where the reviser can identify the key tokens that need to be revised in the generator's response based on reward, and (b) iterative self-evolution, where the improving ability to revise answers can be distilled back into generation performance with regular teacher synchronization.
Related papers
- Rethinking Reward Supervision: Rubric-Conditioned Self-Distillation [60.55792673956761]
We propose textbfRubric-Conditioned Self-Distillation, a framework that incorporates rubrics as structured, fine-grained feedback for on-policy self-distillation.<n>We evaluate on a diverse suite of science reasoning benchmarks and results show that rubric-conditioned self-distillation effectively converts rubric-level criteria into token-level guidance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T17:54:04Z) - Rubric-Guided Self-Distillation: Post-Training Without Rubric Verifiers [25.040339775169883]
We propose a verifier-free training method in which the base policy, conditioned on the rubric, serves as the teacher for the unconditioned student.<n>Across Qwen-2.5 (3B, 7B) and Qwen3-Thinking (4B, 8B) models on medical and science domains, RGSD achieves satisfaction comparable to judge-based rubricO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-10T17:53:19Z) - INFUSER: Influence-Guided Self-Evolution Improves Reasoning [54.101135873140066]
We introduce an iterative co-training framework with two co-evolving roles.<n>A solver is trained with standard correctness rewards against the generator-provided answers.<n>An 8B INF co-evolving generator outperforms a frozen 32B thinking generator on math and coding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-08T05:40:36Z) - RationalRewards: Reasoning Rewards Scale Visual Generation Both Training and Test Time [51.256131853751754]
We show that teaching reward models to produce explicit, multi-dimensional critiques transforms them from passive evaluators into active optimization tools.<n>We introduce Preference-Anchored Rationalization (PARROT), a principled framework that recovers high-quality rationales from readily available preference data.<n>The resulting model, RationalRewards (8B), achieves state-of-the-art preference prediction among open-source reward models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-13T15:38:09Z) - Self-Distilled RLVR [57.37526213765131]
We show that learning signals solely derived from the privileged teacher result in severe information leakage and unstable long-term training.<n>We propose textbfRLSD (textbfRLVR with textbfSelf-textbfDistillation)<n>This enables RLSD to simultaneously harness the strengths of both RLVR and OPSD, achieving a higher convergence ceiling and superior training stability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-03T15:50:07Z) - The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoning [37.13807960501503]
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a promising approach for training language models (LMs)<n>We decompose the learning signal into reinforcing correct responses and penalizing incorrect ones, referred to as Positive and Negative Sample Reinforcement (PSR and NSR)<n>We show that NSR works by suppressing incorrect generations and redistributing probability mass toward other plausible candidates, guided by the model's prior beliefs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T06:10:54Z) - Distill Not Only Data but Also Rewards: Can Smaller Language Models Surpass Larger Ones? [58.80794196076336]
Distilling large language models (LLMs) typically involves transferring the teacher model's responses through supervised fine-tuning (SFT)<n>We propose a novel distillation pipeline that transfers both responses and rewards.<n>Our method generates pseudo-rewards through a self-supervised mechanism that leverages the inherent structure of both teacher and student responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-26T20:50:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.