Distill Not Only Data but Also Rewards: Can Smaller Language Models Surpass Larger Ones?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19557v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:50:11 GMT
• Title: Distill Not Only Data but Also Rewards: Can Smaller Language Models Surpass Larger Ones?
• Authors: Yudi Zhang, Lu Wang, Meng Fang, Yali Du, Chenghua Huang, Jun Wang, Qingwei Lin, Mykola Pechenizkiy, Dongmei Zhang, Saravan Rajmohan, Qi Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Distilling large language models (LLMs) typically involves transferring the teacher model's responses through supervised fine-tuning (SFT)<n>We propose a novel distillation pipeline that transfers both responses and rewards.<n>Our method generates pseudo-rewards through a self-supervised mechanism that leverages the inherent structure of both teacher and student responses.
• Score: 58.80794196076336
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Distilling large language models (LLMs) typically involves transferring the teacher model's responses through supervised fine-tuning (SFT). However, this approach neglects the potential to distill both data (output content) and reward signals (quality evaluations). Extracting reliable reward signals directly from teacher models is challenging, as LLMs are optimized for generation rather than evaluation, often resulting in biased or inconsistent assessments. To address this limitation, we propose a novel distillation pipeline that transfers both responses and rewards. Our method generates pseudo-rewards through a self-supervised mechanism that leverages the inherent structure of both teacher and student responses, enabling reward learning without explicit external evaluation. The reward model subsequently guides reinforcement learning (RL), allowing iterative refinement of the student model after an SFT warm-up phase. Experiments on GSM8K and MMLU-PRO demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms traditional SFT-based approaches, enabling student models to surpass the performance of their teachers. This work highlights the potential for scalable, efficient distillation through structured self-supervised reward learning, reducing dependence on external reward supervision.

Related papers

• Learning from Stochastic Teacher Representations Using Student-Guided Knowledge Distillation [64.15918654558816]
  Self-distillation (SSD) training strategy is introduced for filtering and weighting teacher representation to distill from task-relevant representations only. Experimental results on real-world affective computing, wearable/biosignal datasets from the UCR Archive, the HAR dataset, and image classification datasets show that the proposed SSD method can outperform state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T14:08:56Z)
• Learning to Reason via Self-Iterative Process Feedback for Small Language Models [5.3831551965806534]
  Small language models (SLMs) are more efficient, cost-effective, and customizable than large language models (LLMs) This study enables SLMs to learn to reason from self-iterative feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T14:05:04Z)
• Efficient Diffusion as Low Light Enhancer [63.789138528062225]
  Reflectance-Aware Trajectory Refinement (RATR) is a simple yet effective module to refine the teacher trajectory using the reflectance component of images. textbfReflectance-aware textbfDiffusion with textbfDistilled textbfTrajectory (textbfReDDiT) is an efficient and flexible distillation framework tailored for Low-Light Image Enhancement (LLIE)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T08:07:18Z)
• Exploring and Enhancing the Transfer of Distribution in Knowledge Distillation for Autoregressive Language Models [62.5501109475725]
  Knowledge distillation (KD) is a technique that compresses large teacher models by training smaller student models to mimic them. This paper introduces Online Knowledge Distillation (OKD), where the teacher network integrates small online modules to concurrently train with the student model. OKD achieves or exceeds the performance of leading methods in various model architectures and sizes, reducing training time by up to fourfold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T07:05:26Z)
• Getting More Juice Out of the SFT Data: Reward Learning from Human Demonstration Improves SFT for LLM Alignment [65.15914284008973]
  We propose to leverage an Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) technique to simultaneously build an reward model and a policy model. We show that the proposed algorithms converge to the stationary solutions of the IRL problem. Our results indicate that it is beneficial to leverage reward learning throughout the entire alignment process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T07:11:05Z)
• Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [64.92448888346125]
  We leverage the fact that the reward model contains more information than just its scalar output. We use these attention weights to redistribute the reward along the whole completion. Empirically, we show that it stabilises training, accelerates the rate of learning, and, in practical cases, may lead to better local optima.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T17:10:35Z)
• Beyond Sparse Rewards: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Language Model Critique in Text Generation [29.6763730290473]
  Reinforcement learning can align language models with non-differentiable reward signals, such as human preferences. This paper introduces a novel framework that utilizes the critique capability of Large Language Models to produce intermediate-step rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-14T22:05:11Z)
• SCOTT: Self-Consistent Chain-of-Thought Distillation [68.40232422158569]
  Large language models (LMs) generate free-text rationales for their predictions via chain-of-thought prompting. We propose a faithful knowledge distillation method to learn a small, self-consistent CoT model from a teacher model that is orders of magnitude larger. To ensure faithful distillation, we use the teacher-generated rationales to learn a student LM with a counterfactual reasoning objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T03:47:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.