Decoding by Perturbation: Mitigating MLLM Hallucinations via Dynamic Textual Perturbation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12424v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:15:44 GMT
• Title: Decoding by Perturbation: Mitigating MLLM Hallucinations via Dynamic Textual Perturbation
• Abstract summary: Decoding by Perturbation (DeP) is a training-free framework mitigating prior-induced hallucinations.<n>It employs a dynamic probe applying multi-level textual perturbations to elicit latent language priors.<n>Extensive experiments confirm DeP effectively reduces hallucinations and achieves superior performance across multiple benchmarks.
• Score: 36.57014987764294
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models frequently suffer from inference hallucinations, partially stemming from language priors dominating visual evidence. Existing training-free mitigation methods either perturb the visual representation and deviate from the natural image distribution, or enforce intrusive manipulations that compromise the model's inherent generative fluency. We introduce a novel perspective that multimodal hallucination manifests as the hypersensitivity of visual grounding to textual phrasing during the decoding phase. Building on this insight, we propose Decoding by Perturbation (DeP), a training-free framework mitigating prior-induced hallucinations via controlled textual interventions. DeP employs a dynamic probe applying multi-level textual perturbations to elicit latent language priors. Leveraging attention variance, it enhances stable evidence regions while suppressing suspicious noise in the feature space. Furthermore, it constructs an interpretable prior drift direction using logits statistics to counteract probability biases from textual co-occurrences. Extensive experiments confirm DeP effectively reduces hallucinations and achieves superior performance across multiple benchmarks.

Related papers

• HIVE: Understanding Post-Hallucination Reasoning in Vision Language Models [70.67112531913669]
  Hallucinations in vision language models are commonly treated as semantic errors.<n>Prior work mainly focuses on detecting or suppressing hallucinations at generation time.<n>We study Post Hallucination Reasoning (PHR), the stage in which hallucinated semantics enter the model's inference context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T15:02:11Z)
• Rethinking Visual Neglect: Steering via Context-Preference for MLLM Hallucination Mitigation [5.041079621345155]
  We argue that the image, as a context, simultaneously competes with the model's parametric knowledge and the textual context.<n>We propose a training-free framework, Context-Preference Steering (CAS), which extracts two semantically distinct Context Preference Vectors.<n>Experiments show that CAS substantially mitigates object hallucinations without increasing residual latency and preserves native text-generation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T05:33:06Z)
• Prefill-Time Intervention for Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models [14.32953618311784]
  Prefill-Time Intervention (PTI) is a novel steering paradigm that intervenes only once during the prefill stage.<n>PTI is modality-aware, deriving distinct directions for visual and textual representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T13:42:27Z)
• VCE: A zero-cost hallucination mitigation method of LVLMs via visual contrastive editing [70.82867621856968]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) frequently suffer from Object Hallucination (OH)<n>Recent studies suggest that the hallucination problem may stem from language priors.<n>We propose Visual Contrastive Editing (VCE), a novel post-hoc method that identifies and suppresses hallucinatory tendencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T12:40:07Z)
• Mitigating Entangled Steering in Large Vision-Language Models for Hallucination Reduction [49.96701537295129]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable success across cross-modal tasks but remain hindered by hallucinations.<n>Existing methods mitigate hallucinations but often alter generation behavior, resulting in shorter outputs and shifted token distributions.<n>We propose MESA, an effective plug-and-play framework that performs controlled and selective latent intervention for hallucination mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T07:31:27Z)
• ACT Now: Preempting LVLM Hallucinations via Adaptive Context Integration [71.21097024566285]
  Large-Language Models (LVLMs) frequently suffer from severe hallucination issues.<n>Existing mitigation strategies rely on linguistic, single-step states to enhance visual focus or suppress strong priors.<n>We propose Adaptive Context in VisionTegration (ACT), a training-free inference intervention method that mitigates hallucination through the adaptive integration of contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T14:49:50Z)
• Seeing Through the Chain: Mitigate Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Models via CoT Compression and Contrastive Preference Optimization [78.94590726578014]
  multimodal reasoning models (MLRMs) remain prone to hallucinations, and effective solutions are still underexplored.<n>We propose C3PO, a training-based mitigation framework comprising textbfCompression and textbfPreference textbfOptimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T11:00:55Z)
• Mitigating Multimodal Hallucinations via Gradient-based Self-Reflection [49.26064449816502]
  We propose a Gradient-based Influence-Aware Constrained Decoding (GACD) method to address text-visual bias and co-occurrence bias.<n>GACD effectively reduces hallucinations and improves the visual grounding of MLLM outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T08:13:52Z)
• OViP: Online Vision-Language Preference Learning for VLM Hallucination [44.14029765850719]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) remain vulnerable to hallucination, often generating content misaligned with visual inputs.<n>We propose an Online Vision-language Preference Learning framework that dynamically constructs contrastive training data based on the model's own hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T19:26:09Z)
• PerturboLLaVA: Reducing Multimodal Hallucinations with Perturbative Visual Training [56.172959986096316]
  This paper aims to address the challenge of hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>HalFscore is a novel metric built upon the language graph and is designed to evaluate both the accuracy and completeness of dense captions at a granular level.<n>PerturboLLaVA significantly improves the fidelity of generated captions, outperforming existing approaches in handling multimodal hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T07:07:03Z)
• VaLiD: Mitigating the Hallucination of Large Vision Language Models by Visual Layer Fusion Contrastive Decoding [38.23310445372371]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in multimodal task reasoning.<n>They often generate responses that appear plausible yet do not accurately reflect the visual content, a phenomenon known as hallucination.<n>Recent approaches have introduced training-free methods to mitigate hallucinations by adjusting the decoding strategy during the inference stage.<n>We propose a novel hallucination-mitigation method from the visual encoding perspective: textbfVisutextbfal textbfLayer Fustextbfion Contrastive textbfD
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T13:42:02Z)
• Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding [25.489832294197797]
  This paper introduces the Instruction Contrastive Decoding (ICD) method, a novel approach designed to reduce hallucinations during LVLM inference. Our method is inspired by our observation that what we call disturbance instructions significantly exacerbate hallucinations in multimodal fusion modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T16:04:47Z)
• Hallucination Augmented Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Large Language Model [53.65682783591723]
  Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have been shown to efficiently integrate natural language with visual information to handle multi-modal tasks. However, MLLMs still face a fundamental limitation of hallucinations, where they tend to generate erroneous or fabricated information. In this paper, we address hallucinations in MLLMs from a novel perspective of representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T04:05:15Z)
• Zero-Resource Hallucination Prevention for Large Language Models [45.4155729393135]
  "Hallucination" refers to instances where large language models (LLMs) generate factually inaccurate or ungrounded information. We introduce a novel pre-language self-evaluation technique, referred to as SELF-FAMILIARITY, which focuses on evaluating the model's familiarity with the concepts present in the input instruction. We validate SELF-FAMILIARITY across four different large language models, demonstrating consistently superior performance compared to existing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T01:57:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.