Agentic Discovery with Active Hypothesis Exploration for Visual Recognition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12999v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:34:05 GMT
• Title: Agentic Discovery with Active Hypothesis Exploration for Visual Recognition
• Abstract summary: HypoExplore formulates neural architecture discovery for visual recognition as a hypothesis-driven scientific inquiry.<n>New hypotheses are created using a large language model by selecting a parent hypothesis to build upon, guided by a dual strategy.<n>We show that hypothesis confidence scores grow increasingly predictive as evidence accumulates, and that the learned principles transfer across independent evolutionary lineages.
• Score: 22.895961870906405
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce HypoExplore, an agentic framework that formulates neural architecture discovery for visual recognition as a hypothesis-driven scientific inquiry. Given a human-specified high-level research direction, HypoExplore ideates, implements, evaluates, and improves neural architectures through evolutionary branching. New hypotheses are created using a large language model by selecting a parent hypothesis to build upon, guided by a dual strategy that balances exploiting validated principles with resolving uncertain ones. Our proposed framework maintains a Trajectory Tree that records the lineage of all proposed architectures, and a Hypothesis Memory Bank that actively tracks confidence scores acquired through experimental evidence. After each experiment, multiple feedback agents analyze the results from different perspectives and consolidate their findings into hypothesis confidence updates. Our framework is tested on discovering lightweight vision architectures on CIFAR-10, with the best achieving 94.11% accuracy evolved from a root node baseline that starts at 18.91%, and generalizes to CIFAR-100 and Tiny-ImageNet. We further demonstrate applicability to a specialized domain by conducting independent architecture discovery runs on MedMNIST, which yield a state-of-the-art performance. We show that hypothesis confidence scores grow increasingly predictive as evidence accumulates, and that the learned principles transfer across independent evolutionary lineages, suggesting that HypoExplore not only discovers stronger architectures, but can help build a genuine understanding of the design space.

Related papers

• AgentIdeaBench: Benchmarking Scientific Ideation in the Agent Era [55.37558486468993]
  We introduce AgentIdeaBench, a benchmark that evaluates scientific ideation under two matched settings, static observation and active exploration.<n>We report matched Static-Active evaluations for 33 LLMs across 40 densely scored subfields spanning five disciplines.<n>Active exploration reveals considerably more capability headroom, and that headroom is unevenly distributed across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T15:19:13Z)
• Long-Horizon Autonomous Architecture Research with a Language-Model Agent: A Behavioural Case Study [0.3683202928838613]
  We study what happens when a single general-purpose large language model acts as the sole researcher on a long-horizon neural architecture design problem.<n>The study comprises three phases, separated by human-declared transitions, that progressively expand the agent's tool surface or problem scale.<n>We conclude that workflow design was at least as influential as agent capability in this study and propose diversified search, budgeted moonshot hypotheses, explicit forks, and regime-aware re-validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T09:56:34Z)
• Before the Action: Benchmarking LLMs on Prospective Hypothesis Discovery [95.44432473367836]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel at answering pre-specified questions, yet their ability to navigate the open-ended, pre-conclusion stage of discovery remains largely unmeasured.<n>We introduce Prospective Hypothesis Discovery (PHD), which asks models to autonomously construct grounded, discnative, and testable hypothesis spaces from inconclusive evidence.<n>We introduce HypoArena, comprising HypoData, a benchmark of 988 cases across six scientific and analytical domains, and HypoEval, an evaluation framework for open-ended hypothesis sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T08:56:43Z)
• Hypothesis-Driven Deep Research with Large Language Models: A Structured Methodology for Automated Knowledge Discovery [0.0]
  Current AI-powered research systems adopt a direct search-then-summarize paradigm that treats hypotheses as end products of scientific discovery.<n>We argue this leaves a critical gap: hypotheses can serve a far more powerful role as organizational matching instruments that structure the research process itself.<n>We propose Hypothesis-Driven Deep Research (I) pipeline methodology - the first framework using hypotheses to organize general-purpose deep research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T09:04:09Z)
• OR-Agent: Bridging Evolutionary Search and Structured Research for Automated Algorithm Discovery [10.217363774023033]
  OR-Agent is a multi-agent research framework designed for automated exploration in rich experimental environments.<n>We introduce an evolutionary-systematic mechanism that unifies evolutionary selection of research starting points, comprehensive research plan generation, and coordinated exploration within a research tree.<n>We conduct experiments across classical optimization benchmarks-including traveling salesman, capacitated vehicle routing, bin packing, orienteering, and multiple knapsack problems-as well as a simulation-based cooperative driving scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T13:32:03Z)
• FIRE-Bench: Evaluating Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific Insights [63.32178443510396]
  We introduce FIRE-Bench (Full-cycle Insight Rediscovery Evaluation), a benchmark that evaluates agents through the rediscovery of established findings.<n>Even the strongest agents achieve limited rediscovery success (50 F1), exhibit high variance across runs, and display recurring failure modes in experimental design, execution, and evidence-based reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T23:21:13Z)
• Hypothesis Hunting with Evolving Networks of Autonomous Scientific Agents [52.50038914857797]
  We term this process hypothesis hunting: the cumulative search for insight through sustained exploration across vast and complex hypothesis spaces.<n>We introduce AScience, a framework modeling discovery as the interaction of agents, networks, and evaluation norms, and implement it as ASCollab.<n> Experiments show that such social dynamics enable the accumulation of expert-rated results along the diversity-quality-novelty frontier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T08:47:07Z)
• Bayes-Entropy Collaborative Driven Agents for Research Hypotheses Generation and Optimization [4.469102316542763]
  This paper proposes a multi-agent collaborative framework called HypoAgents.<n>It generates hypotheses through diversity sampling and establishes prior beliefs.<n>It then employs etrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to gather external literature evidence.<n>It identifies high-uncertainty hypotheses using information entropy $H = - sum p_ilog p_i$ and actively refines them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T13:05:32Z)
• GUIDE: Towards Scalable Advising for Research Ideas [29.754833632647195]
  We develop a system to provide high-quality, well-reasoned feedback to refine proposed hypotheses and experimental designs.<n>Our system achieves an acceptance rate exceeding 90% on the ICLR 2025 test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T17:59:21Z)
• Open-ended Scientific Discovery via Bayesian Surprise [63.26412847240136]
  AutoDS is a method for open-ended scientific discovery that instead drives scientific exploration using Bayesian surprise.<n>We evaluate AutoDS in the setting of data-driven discovery across 21 real-world datasets spanning domains such as biology, economics, finance, and behavioral science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T22:53:59Z)
• MOOSE-Chem3: Toward Experiment-Guided Hypothesis Ranking via Simulated Experimental Feedback [136.27567671480156]
  We introduce experiment-guided ranking, which prioritizes hypotheses based on feedback from prior tests.<n>We frame experiment-guided ranking as a sequential decision-making problem.<n>Our approach significantly outperforms pre-experiment baselines and strong ablations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T13:24:50Z)
• Sparks: Multi-Agent Artificial Intelligence Model Discovers Protein Design Principles [0.0]
  We present Sparks, a multi-modal multi-agent AI model that executes the entire discovery cycle.<n>Sparks can independently conduct rigorous scientific inquiry and identify previously unknown scientific principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-26T20:43:28Z)
• Large Language Models for Automated Open-domain Scientific Hypotheses Discovery [50.40483334131271]
  This work proposes the first dataset for social science academic hypotheses discovery. Unlike previous settings, the new dataset requires (1) using open-domain data (raw web corpus) as observations; and (2) proposing hypotheses even new to humanity. A multi- module framework is developed for the task, including three different feedback mechanisms to boost performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T05:19:41Z)
• The Open-World Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for OOD Intent Classification [68.93357975024773]
  We shed light on the fundamental cause of model overconfidence on OOD. We also extend the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to open-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T14:58:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.