Hybrid Retrieval for COVID-19 Literature: Comparing Rank Fusion and Projection Fusion with Diversity Reranking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13728v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:05:46 GMT
• Title: Hybrid Retrieval for COVID-19 Literature: Comparing Rank Fusion and Projection Fusion with Diversity Reranking
• Abstract summary: We present a hybrid retrieval system for COVID-19 scientific literature, evaluated on the TREC-COVID benchmark.<n>The system implements six retrieval configurations spanning sparse (SPLADE), dense (BGE), rank-level fusion (RRF) and a projection-based vector fusion (B5) approach.<n>RRF fusion achieves the best relevance (nDCG@10 = 0.828), outperforming dense-only by 6.1% and sparse-only by 14.9%.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present a hybrid retrieval system for COVID-19 scientific literature, evaluated on the TREC-COVID benchmark (171,332 papers, 50 expert queries). The system implements six retrieval configurations spanning sparse (SPLADE), dense (BGE), rank-level fusion (RRF), and a projection-based vector fusion (B5) approach. RRF fusion achieves the best relevance (nDCG@10 = 0.828), outperforming dense-only by 6.1% and sparse-only by 14.9%. Our projection fusion variant reaches nDCG@10 = 0.678 on expert queries while being 33% faster (847 ms vs. 1271 ms) and producing 2.2x higher ILD@10 than RRF. Evaluation across 400 queries -- including expert, machine-generated, and three paraphrase styles -- shows that B5 delivers the largest relative gain on keyword-heavy reformulations (+8.8%), although RRF remains best in absolute nDCG@10. On expert queries, MMR reranking increases intra-list diversity by 23.8-24.5% at a 20.4-25.4% nDCG@10 cost. Both fusion pipelines evaluated for latency remain below the sub-2 s target across all query sets. The system is deployed as a Streamlit web application backed by Pinecone serverless indices.

Related papers

• Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Prompt Ensemble for Minor-Grain Breeding Information Extraction [45.40972888157319]
  RAME (Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Prompt Ensemble) is a training-free framework that elicits multiple LLM outputs under controlled diversity.<n> RAME achieves a Total Score of 0.499 (NER 0.730, RE 0.346) on the leaderboard, ranking 1st and surpassing the official Track-A baseline powered by GPT-5.5 (0.448)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T07:30:49Z)
• P2Fusion: Prompt-based Progressive Infrared-Visible Image Fusion via Dual-Prior Distillation [73.147281449267]
  We propose P2Fusion, a prior-guided distillation-based framework that reformulates infrared-visible image fusion.<n>Instead of imposing hard-coded penalties, we distill image-intrinsic priors, thermal saliency and spatial quality, into learnable dynamic regulators.<n>P2Fusion achieves state-of-the-art results in 14 out of 20 key evaluation metrics across 5 benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-13T10:09:49Z)
• SciRet: A Compute-Aware Empirical Study of Retrieval and Reranking for Scientific RAG [0.0]
  We introduce SciRet, a compute-aware empirical study of retrieval-augmented generation for scientific question answering over CORD-19.<n>We evaluate a fixed scientific RAG pipeline across three corpus scales: 1,034 chunks (1K papers), 5,160 chunks (5K papers), and 15,480 chunks (15K papers)<n>Across these settings, hybrid retrieval is more robust than either sparse-only or dense-only retrieval in our setting, reaching Recall@10 of 1.000 at 1K and 15K.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T16:04:07Z)
• SciClaimSeekers at CheckThat! 2026: Retrieving Scientific Sources for Social Media Claims with LLM Reranking [3.969046654861534]
  SciClaimSeekers is a retrieval and reranking framework.<n>System combines BM25 and zero-shot multilingual E5 retrieval with Reciprocal Rank Fusion.<n>Our experiment suggests that large pre-trained models, when combined into a careful pipeline, can be competitive on this task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T16:36:46Z)
• Delta-Based Neural Architecture Search: LLM Fine-Tuning via Code Diffs [48.83701310501069]
  Large language models (LLMs) show strong potential for neural architecture generation.<n>Existing approaches produce complete model implementations from scratch.<n>We propose Delta-Code Generation, where fine-tuned LLMs generate compact unified diffs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T13:32:05Z)
• vstash: Local-First Hybrid Retrieval with Adaptive Fusion for LLM Agents [0.0]
  We present **vstash**, a local-first document memory system that combines vector similarity search with fulltext keyword matching.<n>All data resides in a single file using sqlite-vec for approximate nearest neighbor search and FTS5 for keyword matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T19:22:58Z)
• From BM25 to Corrective RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval Strategies for Text-and-Table Documents [0.0]
  We benchmark ten retrieval strategies spanning sparse, dense, hybrid fusion, cross-encoder reranking, query expansion, index augmentation, and adaptive retrieval.<n>We evaluate retrieval quality via Recall@k, MRR, and nDCG, and end-to-end generation quality via Number Match.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T07:53:40Z)
• Resolving the Robustness-Precision Trade-off in Financial RAG through Hybrid Document-Routed Retrieval [7.563079821809866]
  Hybrid Document-Routed Retrieval (HDRR) is a two-stage architecture that uses SFR as a document filter followed by chunk-based retrieval scoped to the identified document(s)<n> Experimental results demonstrate that HDRR achieves the best performance on every metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T18:05:38Z)
• Test-Time Strategies for More Efficient and Accurate Agentic RAG [58.44913384057518]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems face challenges with complex, multihop questions.<n>Such approaches can introduce inefficiencies, including repetitive retrieval of previously processed information.<n>We investigate test-time modifications to the Search-R1 pipeline to mitigate these identified shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T19:18:59Z)
• Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage [89.58253972744531]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems combine document retrieval with a generative model to address complex information seeking tasks like report generation.<n>We investigate whether upstream retrieval metrics can serve as reliable early indicators of the final generated response's information coverage.<n>Our findings demonstrate strong correlations between coverage-based retrieval metrics and nugget coverage in generated responses at both topic and system levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T18:20:20Z)
• Unifying Mixture of Experts and Multi-Head Latent Attention for Efficient Language Models [1.7272658301768147]
  MoE-MLA-RoPE is a novel architecture combination that combines Mixture of Experts (MoE) with Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) and Rotary Position Embeddings (RoPE) for efficient language modeling.<n>Our approach addresses the fundamental trade-off between model capacity and computational efficiency through three key innovations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T08:33:30Z)
• Evaluating Hybrid Retrieval Augmented Generation using Dynamic Test Sets: LiveRAG Challenge [8.680958290253914]
  We present our submission to the LiveRAG Challenge 2025, which evaluates retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems on dynamic test sets.<n>Our final hybrid approach combines sparse (BM25) and dense (E5) retrieval methods.<n>We demonstrate that neural re-ranking with RankLLaMA improves MAP from 0.523 to 0.797 but introduces prohibitive computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T21:20:43Z)
• Deep Retrieval at CheckThat! 2025: Identifying Scientific Papers from Implicit Social Media Mentions via Hybrid Retrieval and Re-Ranking [4.275139302875217]
  We present the methodology and results of the Deep Retrieval team for subtask 4b of the CLEF CheckThat! 2025 competition.<n>We propose a hybrid retrieval pipeline that combines lexical precision, semantic generalization, and deep contextual re-ranking.<n>Our approach achieves a mean reciprocal rank at 5 (MRR@5) of 76.46% on the development set and 66.43% on the hidden test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T08:55:39Z)
• Optimized Text Embedding Models and Benchmarks for Amharic Passage Retrieval [49.1574468325115]
  We introduce Amharic-specific dense retrieval models based on pre-trained Amharic BERT and RoBERTa backbones.<n>Our proposed RoBERTa-Base-Amharic-Embed model (110M parameters) achieves a 17.6% relative improvement in MRR@10.<n>More compact variants, such as RoBERTa-Medium-Amharic-Embed (42M) remain competitive while being over 13x smaller.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T23:06:20Z)
• xCOMET-lite: Bridging the Gap Between Efficiency and Quality in Learned MT Evaluation Metrics [69.14652127492438]
  State-of-the-art machine translation evaluation metrics like xCOMET achieve high correlation with human judgment but rely on large encoders. We employ distillation, quantization, and pruning techniques to create efficient xCOMET alternatives. Our experiments show that, using quantization, xCOMET can be compressed up to three times with no quality degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:58:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.