Adaptive Query Routing: A Tier-Based Framework for Hybrid Retrieval Across Financial, Legal, and Medical Documents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14222v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 10:48:13 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Query Routing: A Tier-Based Framework for Hybrid Retrieval Across Financial, Legal, and Medical Documents
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become the standard paradigm for grounding Large Language Model outputs in external knowledge.<n>This paper extends their work by evaluating three retrieval architectures: Vector RAG, Tree Reasoning, and the proposed Adaptive Hybrid Retrieval (AHR) across financial legal legal domains.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become the standard paradigm for grounding Large Language Model outputs in external knowledge. Lumer et al. [1] presented the first systematic evaluation comparing vector-based agentic RAG against hierarchical node-based reasoning systems for financial document QA across 1,200 SEC filings, finding vector-based systems achieved a 68% win rate. Concurrently, the PageIndex framework [2] demonstrated 98.7% accuracy on FinanceBench through purely reasoning-based retrieval. This paper extends their work by: (i) implementing and evaluating three retrieval architectures: Vector RAG, Tree Reasoning, and the proposed Adaptive Hybrid Retrieval (AHR) across financial, legal, and medical domains; (ii) introducing a four-tier query complexity benchmark; and (iii) employing GPT-4-powered LLM-as-judge evaluation. Experiments reveal that Tree Reasoning achieves the highest overall score (0.900), but no single paradigm dominates across all tiers: Vector RAG wins on multi-document synthesis (Tier 4, score 0.900), while the Hybrid AHR achieves the best performance on cross-reference (0.850) and multi-section queries (0.929). Cross-reference recall reaches 100% for tree-based and hybrid approaches versus 91.7% for vector search, quantifying a critical capability gap. Validation on FinanceBench (150 expert-annotated questions on real SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings) confirms and strengthens these findings: Tree Reasoning scores 0.938, Hybrid AHR 0.901, and Vector RAG 0.821, with the Tree--Vector quality gap widening to 11.7 percentage points on real-world documents. These findings support the development of adaptive retrieval systems that dynamically select strategies based on query complexity and document structure. All code and data are publicly available.

Related papers

• VecTree-RAG: An Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework Combining Vector and Tree Retrieval for Efficiency and Accuracy [1.7944454238144063]
  VecTree-RAG is an agentic framework that assigns these tasks to complementary retrieval mechanisms.<n>VecTree-RAG obtained the highest observed answer score on all three benchmarks.<n>VecTree-RAG provides a structure-aware and traceable architecture for scientific literature question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-25T02:50:05Z)
• Novelty-Aware Agentic Retrieval: Comparing Research Contributions Through Structured Multi-Step Reasoning [0.0]
  Novelty-Aware Research Agent is a prototype agentic retrieval system.<n>It layers structured multi-step reasoning on a RAG pipeline through six typed-contract components.<n>It produces structured comparison artifacts: per-paper contribution records, paper-level overlaps, and a problem x method gap matrix.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-20T17:04:02Z)
• From BM25 to Corrective RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval Strategies for Text-and-Table Documents [0.0]
  We benchmark ten retrieval strategies spanning sparse, dense, hybrid fusion, cross-encoder reranking, query expansion, index augmentation, and adaptive retrieval.<n>We evaluate retrieval quality via Recall@k, MRR, and nDCG, and end-to-end generation quality via Number Match.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T07:53:40Z)
• Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage [89.58253972744531]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems combine document retrieval with a generative model to address complex information seeking tasks like report generation.<n>We investigate whether upstream retrieval metrics can serve as reliable early indicators of the final generated response's information coverage.<n>Our findings demonstrate strong correlations between coverage-based retrieval metrics and nugget coverage in generated responses at both topic and system levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T18:20:20Z)
• RAGRouter-Bench: A Dataset and Benchmark for Adaptive RAG Routing [37.7721677767453]
  We introduce RAG-Bench, the first dataset and benchmark designed for adaptive RAG routing.<n>RAG-Bench revisits retrieval from a query-corpus compatibility perspective and standardizes five representative RAG paradigms for systematic evaluation.<n> Experiments with DeepSeek-V3 and LLaMA-3.1-8B demonstrate that no single RAG paradigm is universally optimal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T20:38:11Z)
• Rethinking Retrieval: From Traditional Retrieval Augmented Generation to Agentic and Non-Vector Reasoning Systems in the Financial Domain for Large Language Models [0.0]
  We present the first systematic evaluation comparing vector-based agentic RAG using hybrid search and metadata filtering.<n>We measure retrieval metrics (MRR, Recall@5), answer quality through LLM-as-a-judge pairwise comparisons, latency, and preprocessing costs.<n>Our findings reveal that applying advanced RAG techniques to financial Q&A systems improves retrieval accuracy, answer quality, and has cost-performance tradeoffs to be considered in production.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-22T20:06:25Z)
• Towards Global Retrieval Augmented Generation: A Benchmark for Corpus-Level Reasoning [50.27838512822097]
  We introduce GlobalQA, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate global RAG capabilities.<n>We propose GlobalRAG, a multi-tool collaborative framework that preserves structural coherence through chunk-level retrieval.<n>On the Qwen2.5-14B model, GlobalRAG achieves 6.63 F1 compared to the strongest baseline's 1.51 F1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T07:29:14Z)
• Eigen-1: Adaptive Multi-Agent Refinement with Monitor-Based RAG for Scientific Reasoning [53.45095336430027]
  We develop a unified framework that combines implicit retrieval and structured collaboration.<n>On Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) Bio/Chem Gold, our framework achieves 48.3% accuracy.<n>Results on SuperGPQA and TRQA confirm robustness across domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T14:05:55Z)
• BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent [74.10138164281618]
  BrowseComp-Plus is a benchmark derived from BrowseComp, employing a fixed, carefully curated corpus.<n>This benchmark allows comprehensive evaluation and disentangled analysis of deep research agents and retrieval methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T17:55:11Z)
• RAGentA: Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Attributed Question Answering [4.224843546370802]
  We present RAGentA, a framework for attributed question answering with large language models (LLMs)<n>With the goal of trustworthy answer generation, RAGentA focuses on optimizing answer correctness, defined by coverage and relevance to the question and faithfulness.<n>Central to the framework is a hybrid retrieval strategy that combines sparse and dense methods, improving Recall@20 by 12.5% compared to the best single retrieval model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T13:37:03Z)
• SiReRAG: Indexing Similar and Related Information for Multihop Reasoning [96.60045548116584]
  SiReRAG is a novel RAG indexing approach that explicitly considers both similar and related information.<n>SiReRAG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art indexing methods on three multihop datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T04:56:43Z)
• Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Trees [119.57169648859707]
  We introduce Eurus, a suite of large language models (LLMs) optimized for reasoning. Eurus models achieve state-of-the-art results among open-source models on a diverse set of benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T16:25:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.