Rethinking Retrieval: From Traditional Retrieval Augmented Generation to Agentic and Non-Vector Reasoning Systems in the Financial Domain for Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18177v1
• Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 20:06:25 GMT
• Title: Rethinking Retrieval: From Traditional Retrieval Augmented Generation to Agentic and Non-Vector Reasoning Systems in the Financial Domain for Large Language Models
• Authors: Elias Lumer, Matt Melich, Olivia Zino, Elena Kim, Sara Dieter, Pradeep Honaganahalli Basavaraju, Vamse Kumar Subbiah, James A. Burke, Roberto Hernandez,
• Abstract summary: We present the first systematic evaluation comparing vector-based agentic RAG using hybrid search and metadata filtering.<n>We measure retrieval metrics (MRR, Recall@5), answer quality through LLM-as-a-judge pairwise comparisons, latency, and preprocessing costs.<n>Our findings reveal that applying advanced RAG techniques to financial Q&A systems improves retrieval accuracy, answer quality, and has cost-performance tradeoffs to be considered in production.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advancements in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) have enabled Large Language Models to answer financial questions using external knowledge bases of U.S. SEC filings, earnings reports, and regulatory documents. However, existing work lacks systematic comparison of vector-based and non-vector RAG architectures for financial documents, and the empirical impact of advanced RAG techniques on retrieval accuracy, answer quality, latency, and cost remain unclear. We present the first systematic evaluation comparing vector-based agentic RAG using hybrid search and metadata filtering against hierarchical node-based systems that traverse document structure without embeddings. We evaluate two enhancement techniques applied to the vector-based architecture, i) cross-encoder reranking for retrieval precision, and ii) small-to-big chunk retrieval for context completeness. Across 1,200 SEC 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K filings on a 150-question benchmark, we measure retrieval metrics (MRR, Recall@5), answer quality through LLM-as-a-judge pairwise comparisons, latency, and preprocessing costs. Vector-based agentic RAG achieves a 68% win rate over hierarchical node-based systems with comparable latency (5.2 compared to 5.98 seconds). Cross-encoder reranking achieves a 59% absolute improvement at optimal parameters (10, 5) for MRR@5. Small-to-big retrieval achieves a 65% win rate over baseline chunking with only 0.2 seconds additional latency. Our findings reveal that applying advanced RAG techniques to financial Q&A systems improves retrieval accuracy, answer quality, and has cost-performance tradeoffs to be considered in production.

Related papers

• Scaling Retrieval Augmented Generation with RAG Fusion: Lessons from an Industry Deployment [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems commonly adopt retrieval fusion techniques to increase document recall.<n>In this work, we evaluate retrieval fusion in a production-style RAG pipeline operating over an enterprise knowledge base.<n>We find that retrieval fusion does increase raw recall, but these gains are largely neutralized after re-ranking and truncation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T18:15:09Z)
• Question Answering for Multi-Release Systems: A Case Study at Ciena [1.3252590516094356]
  Question answering over documents from multi-release systems poses challenges because different releases have distinct yet overlapping documentation.<n>Motivated by the observed inaccuracy of state-of-the-art question-answering techniques on multi-release system documents, we propose QAMR.<n> QAMR enhances traditional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to ensure accuracy in the face of highly similar yet distinct documentation for different releases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T18:44:26Z)
• From HNSW to Information-Theoretic Binarization: Rethinking the Architecture of Scalable Vector Search [0.7804710977378487]
  This paper analyzes the architectural limitations of the dominant "HNSW + float32 + cosine similarity" stack.<n>We introduce and empirically evaluate an alternative information-theoretic architecture based on maximally informative binarization (MIB)<n>Results demonstrate retrieval quality comparable to full-precision systems, while achieving substantially lower latency and maintaining constant throughput at high request rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T23:24:37Z)
• REFRAG: Rethinking RAG based Decoding [67.4862300145604]
  REFRAG is an efficient decoding framework that compresses, senses, and expands to improve latency in RAG applications.<n>We provide rigorous validation of REFRAG across diverse long-context tasks, including RAG, multi-turn conversations, and long document summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T03:31:44Z)
• Diagnosing and Addressing Pitfalls in KG-RAG Datasets: Toward More Reliable Benchmarking [63.84117489519164]
  Knowledge Graph Question Answering systems rely on high-quality benchmarks to evaluate complex multi-hop reasoning.<n>Despite their widespread use, popular datasets such as WebQSP and CWQ suffer from critical quality issues.<n>We introduce KGQAGen, an LLM-in-the-loop framework that systematically resolves these pitfalls.<n>Our findings advocate for more rigorous benchmark construction and position KGQAGen as a scalable framework for advancing KGQA evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T14:44:52Z)
• Process vs. Outcome Reward: Which is Better for Agentic RAG Reinforcement Learning [45.10424242207931]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances the text generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We introduce a novel method ReasonRAG that automatically constructs RAG-ProGuide, a high-quality dataset providing process-level rewards for query generation, evidence extraction, and answer generation.<n>With the process-level policy optimization, the proposed framework empowers LLMs to autonomously invoke search, generate queries, extract relevant evidence, and produce final answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T08:21:00Z)
• Self-Routing RAG: Binding Selective Retrieval with Knowledge Verbalization [95.85537087475882]
  Existing approaches underutilize the inherent knowledge of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose Self-Routing RAG, a novel framework that binds selective retrieval with knowledge verbalization.<n> SR-RAG reduces the number of retrievals by 29% while improving performance by 5.1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T17:59:30Z)
• Fast or Better? Balancing Accuracy and Cost in Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Flexible User Control [52.405085773954596]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation has emerged as a powerful approach to mitigate large language model hallucinations.<n>Existing RAG frameworks often apply retrieval indiscriminately,leading to inefficiencies-over-retrieving.<n>We introduce a novel user-controllable RAG framework that enables dynamic adjustment of the accuracy-cost trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:56:20Z)
• MAIN-RAG: Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generation [34.66546005629471]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are essential tools for various natural language processing tasks but often suffer from generating outdated or incorrect information.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this issue by incorporating external, real-time information retrieval to ground LLM responses.<n>To tackle this problem, we propose Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MAIN-RAG)<n>MAIN-RAG is a training-free RAG framework that leverages multiple LLM agents to collaboratively filter and score retrieved documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-31T08:07:26Z)
• Unanswerability Evaluation for Retrieval Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
  UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.<n>We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z)
• METIS: Fast Quality-Aware RAG Systems with Configuration Adaptation [8.56831524622908]
  This paper presents METIS, the first RAG system that jointly schedules queries and adapts the key RAG configurations of each query.<n>We show that compared with the state-of-the-art RAG optimization schemes, METIS reduces the generation latency by $1.64-2.54times$ without sacrificing generation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T20:39:30Z)
• Speculative RAG: Enhancing Retrieval Augmented Generation through Drafting [68.90949377014742]
  Speculative RAG is a framework that leverages a larger generalist LM to efficiently verify multiple RAG drafts produced in parallel by a smaller, distilled specialist LM.<n>Our method accelerates RAG by delegating drafting to the smaller specialist LM, with the larger generalist LM performing a single verification pass over the drafts.<n>It notably enhances accuracy by up to 12.97% while reducing latency by 50.83% compared to conventional RAG systems on PubHealth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T06:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.