Tight Sample Complexity Bounds for Best-Arm Identification Under Bounded Systematic Bias
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14345v2
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 18:07:48 GMT
- Title: Tight Sample Complexity Bounds for Best-Arm Identification Under Bounded Systematic Bias
- Abstract summary: This paper frames the node expansion process as a localized Best-Arm Identification (BAI) problem over dynamic frontiers.<n>By inverting the Lambert W function, we establish an additive sample complexity of $mathcalO((-4L)-2)$, which indicates that safe node elimination is only feasible when the empirical reward gap exceeds $4L$.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: As search depth increases in autonomous reasoning and embodied planning, the candidate action space expands exponentially, heavily taxing computational budgets. While heuristic pruning is a common countermeasure, it operates without formal safety guarantees when surrogate models (like LLMs) exhibit systematic evaluation biases. This paper frames the node expansion process as a localized Best-Arm Identification (BAI) problem over dynamic frontiers, subject to a bounded systematic bias $L$. By inverting the Lambert W function, we establish an additive sample complexity of $\mathcal{O}((Δ-4L)^{-2})$, which indicates that safe node elimination is only feasible when the empirical reward gap exceeds $4L$. We complement this with an information-theoretic lower bound of $Ω((Δ-2L)^{-2})$ to confirm the structural limits of biased search. Subsequent evaluations on both synthetic trees and complex reasoning tasks demonstrate that adhering to this local safety boundary successfully preserves optimal trajectories while maximizing sample allocation efficiency.
Related papers
- Provably Adaptive Linear Approximation for the Shapley Value and Beyond [73.0940890296463]
A fundamental and long-standing challenge is their efficient approximation.<n>We develop a linear-space algorithm that requires $P(|hatboldsymbol-boldsymbol|_2geq)leq $ for all commonly used semi-values.<n>Our algorithm allows explicit minimization of the mean square error for each specific utility function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T16:38:14Z) - Regularized Online RLHF with Generalized Bilinear Preferences [68.44113000390544]
We consider the problem of contextual online RLHF with general preferences.<n>We adopt the Generalized Bilinear Preference Model to capture preferences via low-rank, skew-symmetric matrices.<n>We prove that the dual gap of the greedy policy is bounded by the square of the estimation error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T15:27:53Z) - Provably Efficient Algorithms for S- and Non-Rectangular Robust MDPs with General Parameterization [85.91302339486673]
We study robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs) with general policy parameterization under s-rectangular and non-rectangular uncertainty sets.<n>We prove novel Lipschitz and Lipschitz-smoothness properties for general policy parameterizations that extends to infinite state spaces.<n>We design a projected gradient descent algorithm for s-rectangular uncertainty and a Frank-Wolfe algorithm for non-rectangular uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-11T21:44:20Z) - Blind Inverse Game Theory: Jointly Decoding Rewards and Rationality in Entropy-Regularized Competitive Games [0.0]
We introduce Blind-IGT, the first statistical framework to jointly recover $theta$ and $tau$ from observed behavior.<n>We prove it achieves the optimal $mathcalO(N-1/2)$ convergence rate for joint parameter recovery.<n>We extend our framework to Markov games and demonstrate optimal convergence rates with strong empirical performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-07T16:27:59Z) - Scalable Neural Incentive Design with Parameterized Mean-Field Approximation [28.20524168049273]
We show that when dynamics and rewards are Lipschitz, the finite-$N$ ID objective is approximated by the PMFG at rate $mathscrO(frac1sqrtN)$.<n>We further introduce our Adjoint Mean-Field Incentive Design (AMID) algorithm, which uses explicit differentiation of iterated equilibrium operators to compute gradients efficiently.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T13:18:54Z) - Scalable Primal-Dual Actor-Critic Method for Safe Multi-Agent RL with
General Utilities [12.104551746465932]
We investigate safe multi-agent reinforcement learning, where agents seek to collectively maximize an aggregate sum of local objectives while satisfying their own safety constraints.
Our algorithm converges to a first-order stationary point (FOSP) at the rate of $mathcalOleft(T-2/3right)$.
In the sample-based setting, we demonstrate that, with high probability, our algorithm requires $widetildemathcalOleft(epsilon-3.5right)$ samples to achieve an $epsilon$-FOSP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-27T20:08:35Z) - Optimal Horizon-Free Reward-Free Exploration for Linear Mixture MDPs [60.40452803295326]
We propose a new reward-free algorithm for learning linear Markov decision processes (MDPs)
At the core of our algorithm is uncertainty-weighted value-targeted regression with exploration-driven pseudo-reward.
We show that our algorithm only needs to explore $tilde O( d2varepsilon-2)$ episodes to find an $varepsilon$-optimal policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-17T17:53:28Z) - Policy Mirror Descent Inherently Explores Action Space [10.772560347950053]
We establish for the first time an $tildemathcalO (1/epsilon2)$ sample complexity for online policy gradient methods without any exploration strategies.
New policy gradient methods can prevent repeatedly committing to potentially high-risk actions when searching for optimal policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-08T05:19:08Z) - LSDAT: Low-Rank and Sparse Decomposition for Decision-based Adversarial
Attack [74.5144793386864]
LSDAT crafts perturbations in the low-dimensional subspace formed by the sparse component of the input sample and that of an adversarial sample.
LSD works directly in the image pixel domain to guarantee that non-$ell$ constraints, such as sparsity, are satisfied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-19T13:10:47Z) - Provably Efficient Safe Exploration via Primal-Dual Policy Optimization [105.7510838453122]
We study the Safe Reinforcement Learning (SRL) problem using the Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) formulation.
We present an provably efficient online policy optimization algorithm for CMDP with safe exploration in the function approximation setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-01T17:47:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.